Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Vinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Vinson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete- I'm not seeing the notability. The reliable sources only mention him in passing. . It's not quite clear from the opening sentence what it is he does, or is notable for. The opening sentence appears to be asserting his notability rather than proving it. . I'm not seeing anything significant. The tone of the piece suggests this is a vanity article - and it was created by a single purpose account. I'm inclined to support a delete unless somebody turns up something more significant. Itsalleasy (talk) 17:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : Notable per coverage. Happydit (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : all search results seem to note his candidacy for mayor of Los Angeles Fife~ 20:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FifeStarMedia (talk • contribs) — FifeStarMedia (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SmartSE (talk) 14:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural note. This AFD was never listed properly. I have just added it to the AFD log today, so it needs discussing for 7 days from now. SmartSE (talk) 14:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the sources in the article provide significant coverage of the subject and a search in factiva for better references has turned up nothing for this particular Robert Vinson. SmartSE (talk) 14:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can only find that he was candidate for a member of the City Council, not for Mayor. (not that he would have been notable as a candidate for mayor, but there is a difference--I see he worked on someone else's campaign for mayor--perhaps that's the source of the confusion). DGG ( talk ) 02:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural note This semi-automated edit of mine unlisted it again straight after I added it back in March... I guess it needs another seven days from now. SmartSE (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Evidence sufficient to establish notability under Wikipedia standards is neither provided nor found in the usual searches. Note: others of the same name may well be notable, especially the Robert Vinson who was president of the University of Texas 1916-1923. [1][2] --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Neither his business career nor his unsuccessful candidacy for local office provide notability as Wikipedia defines it. --MelanieN (talk) 02:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.