Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SBC6446
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- SBC6446 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable single-board computer with no evidence of notability. The article has no references. It has three external links, and of these, two are to Empower Technologies (the computer's manufacturer) and the other is to Texas Instruments (the supplier of the processor used). Using "SBC6446 -Wiki -Wikipedia" as the query, Google Web found 3,500 results. There are actually only 249 "relevant" results — on the 25th page (10 results per page), Google omitted the rest since they were too similar to those shown. None of the 249 results were reliable sources. Searching for SBC6446 on Google News, Books, and Scholars returns nothing except for two books that redistribute content from Wikipedia. Rilak (talk) 10:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's just advertising a product. No indication that this product is anotable development in any way; every computer since ENIAC has been called "powerful". --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
