Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzi Barrett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suzi Barrett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable comedian lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 14:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 00:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 16:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The dedicated article in Advertising Age is a major RS verification of notability, even if much of the rest is fluff. Celtechm (talk) 17:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - a single one off fluff article hardly qualifies as significant coverage. Still fails WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 08:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gongshow ^Talk 14:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did a search and couldn't find anything to show that this comedienne has received enough coverage to pass WP:ENTERTAINER. The AA article and the G4 nod do help, but they're not enough to show notability enough to pass WP:ENTERTAINER. Other than that, all of the hits were either non-reliable sources, primary hits, junk hits, and routine notices of performances. She's just not notable at this point in time and none of her commercial work is so overwhelmingly notable (like say, Flo from Progressive) that she'd get an article based on that. Neither does she have a sizable enough fan following to where that would make her notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.