Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vineet Soni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 11:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vineet Soni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the goals towards this person is working are lofty, I don't think that a few mentions in newsletters (even if one is from UNESCO) are enough to establish notability. Does not meet WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article has modified and tagged with authentic references. This article has 6 references ( 4 from IUCN website, 1 from UNESCO and 1 from conservation evidence journal). In my openion, all are authentic and reliable references. Please share your comments. NehaIndia —Preceding undated comment added 18:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Weak Keep Just passes the threshold of WP:GNG. Here is another ref about guggal and it has info on him. Bgwhite (talk) 18:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes Bgwhite , "Significant coverage" in reputed magazine Down to Earth (Indian science and environment magazine)has also included as reliable reference. NehaIndia —Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC). — NehaIndia (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.