Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Yakubovskyi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Desertarun (talk) 17:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vladyslav Yakubovskyi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason -- BLP violations. -- Mantan Kali (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination reformatted by Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ukraine. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article says that the businessperson did bad things, but everything seems to be referenced. I don't think that this is a BLP violation. The corresponding Ukrainian article has basically the same content. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article is translated from the Ukrainian Wikipedia. It contains many non-authoritative sources that have also been transferred here. -- Mantan Kali (talk) 09:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no BLP violations, everything seems to be referenced? Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is in non-authoritative references. -- Mantan Kali (talk) 09:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm the admin who declined speedy deletion the second time, and advised that deletion should be through AFD. I also said that I took a random sample of references and saw that they were fine. I've had another look, and found references that, whilst backing up the text of the article, do not mention Vladyslav Yakubovskyi at all. This gives the impression that (at best) this is WP:OR. I have no problem with keeping the article, but a thorough check of all references needs to be undertaken. The section I am referring to is Correspondence of Lev Parnas Stephen! ^Coming... 11:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is disagreement over sourcing and whether or not there exist BLP violations.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - no specificity in what the BLP violations are. Sourcing seems adequate for the most part, although I would agree that the section around Parnas is potentially a reach in terms of what is relevant. But AFD is not cleanup. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.