Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 August 22

< August 21	August 23 >

August 22

File:Coco Martin.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable nonfree image of a living person. For some reason, the speedy deletion is being ignored. Whpq (talk) 02:51, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prakash Shah diplomat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Description says "photo taken from newspaper by me". That doesn't give copyrights away from the newspaper. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - copyright is not transferred by copying a photo. -- Whpq (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Parmer1965.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Someguy1221 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probable hoax. See [1] Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article the photo was included in has now been deleted as a hoax. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:09, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Image deleted, still exists on Commons, where it has been tagged fro speedy deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:All My Love Paraguay cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I raised the issue about the authenticity of the sleeve at Talk:All My Love (Led Zeppelin song). Rlendog originally uploaded the Atlantic version of the same sleeve from what they(?) asserted rateyourmusic, which claims the release to be Paraguayan promo. Then thisbirdhadflown, whom I pinged one week ago without receiving reply, uploaded the Atco version. However, the song "All My Love" was released by Swan Song Records. I checked 45cat([2][3]), discogs, eBay (including one sold item). I don't see an image of the same sleeve. I did see one item having a sleeve, but it looks apparently different because I don't see photos anywhere.

Troubling about the sleeve is the uncertainty of its authenticity, despite having Atlantic or Atco logo on the cover. I don't see the label's record catalogue number anywhere on the cover. Also, two of the pristine-looking images are also used for the 1990 compilation album. Compare the sleeve to most of "Fool in the Rain" single releases, which used the Swan Song logo rather Atlantic or Atco. An Ecuadorian release (promo maybe?) of "Fool in the Rain" uses Atlantic label and generic sleeve. Both are released in 1979, the same year when In Through the Out Door, which includes both songs, was released. If questionable authenticity isn't sufficient for deletion, what about whether the claimed Paraguayan sleeve complies with WP:NFCC? –George Ho (talk) 22:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thisbirdhadflown gave a reply. After looking at the link that the user gave, I then looked at Release History. One of its logs says that the sleeve is "fake". George Ho (talk) 22:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:June 12 2004-billboards of lahore-beauty girl-c.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This file is currently unused, and I can't really see it having any encyclopedic value. For reference, here is the previous deletion discussion. –Sonicwave ^talk 22:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 04:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.