Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TypographyFixer/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Several weak keeps vs one delete plus an implicit delete from the nominator = no consensus _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:TypographyFixer/sandbox

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ‑Scottywong | [communicate] || 15:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page not related to Wikipedia's goals. User made little contribution in mainspace (xtools edit count). Hddty (talk) 04:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I Can't Copy the Text, Because it Freezed it; So, it would All be Lost. TypographyFixer (talk) 04:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[Looks at edit summaries, too] - Well that's... something. :) Ok I'll bite. @TypographyFixer: what is it you're working on? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:04, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - These are sandboxes with weird content that are the sort of weird stuff that sandboxes can be used for. It looks more likely to be related somehow to Wikipedia than to be improper. In the absence of a reason to delete, allow the user to play, even if they are just mostly playing in their sandboxes. We don't need to discuss at this time whether they need cat repellent. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fix this so the sandboxes don't freeze because of the page length. It's not worth deleting by any stretch, but at the same time, these are causing technical problems on the client side of things. I'll leave it to the closing administrator or editor to find away to declutter the sandboxes. AWB, perhaps might be a better way to fix this, @Robert McClenon and Rhododendrites:? Doug Mehus T·C 18:46, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I Think I Could make Parts of it Into Different Articles. TypographyFixer (talk) 22:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Meh; weak keep – having fun in sandboxes is allowed and isn't causing anyone harm. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 18:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The main sandbox is cluttering up many maintenance categories, and much of it, along with most of the other sandboxes, consists of unattributed copy/paste of actual WP articles which have been altered in incomprehensible or frivolous ways. I see no way—and TypographyFixer certainly hasn't provided one—for this activity to have any encyclopedic purpose or any value with regard to learning about WP editing. Personally, if these were tagged for U5 speedy, I'd have no problem deleting them. Deor (talk) 17:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | [communicate] || 15:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep because it doesn't seem harmful and Typofixer deigned to respond (which is uncommon). — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 09:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.