Wikipedia:Peer review/U2 3D/archive1
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I created this article from scratch and would like to know how to improve it from its current condition to reach GA-status. Thank you for you help. –Dream out loud (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
dihydrogen monoxide comments
- This isn't really too far off GA class. Some minor work and you should be able to get there.
- The setlist ("Track listing") generally goes at the end, just before the references section.
- Something about the first sentence doesn't really click... it's kinda awkward... I dunno, try reformatting the lead somewhat...
- I don't think the ratings table belongs in the production section...
- Considering the amount of information you have on development on stuff, it's surprising there's that little on reception...
- Some of the external links would work better as inline references.
- I'd be happy to do a prose review (ie. a GA review) when you nominate this for GA - just ask!
- I hope these comments help. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Dihydrogen, this is great feedback. Others, please provide more! Dream out loud, since you're the one driving this (and deservedly), my recommendation to you is to make sure you follow up on Dihydrogen's offer to copy edit prose - this is possibly the hardest thing to get assistance on. The offer is thus gold. cheers --Merbabu (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Not certain how useful this might be, but here's another source from one of the camera operators. Let me know if you need any technical jargon "translated". Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
