Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 June 20
June 20
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Template:AF party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Once used an image within it, which was however removed for being non-free, making it useless like this to have a template for. Unused, replaceable with simplest wiki syntax. The Evil IP address (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete—per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 04:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Template:BSG character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No encyclopedic value over and above {{infobox character}}. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. And if you'll nominate Template:Alias character, let me know. Debresser (talk) 07:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete—If it weren't still in use, it would be eligible under CSD T3. Imzadi 1979 → 04:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:World Wrestling Entertainment employees. It's doing pretty much the same job as the original Template:World Wrestling Entertainment employees, just with less information. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 09:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Yin Yang Yo! (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template with only a link to the main article and two more articles. Not everything needs a navbox. LoЯd ۞pεth 03:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, does not justify a navbox. Axem Titanium (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete—I assume the grouped articles already have wikilinks to each other, making this template redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 04:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Template with only a link to the main article, two more articles and a redirect. Not everything needs a navbox. LoЯd ۞pεth 03:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, does not justify a navbox. Axem Titanium (talk) 13:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --AussieLegend (talk) 19:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete—I assume the grouped articles already have wikilinks to each other, making this template redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 04:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Template with only a link to the main article. The rest are two redirects to the main article and a red link. LoЯd ۞pεth 03:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, does not justify a navbox. Axem Titanium (talk) 13:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
