Fergus, Quondam Happy Face's Reviews > Brave New World
Brave New World
by
by
Brave New World says as much about Aldous Huxley as it does about our modern world.
Maybe more.
***
When he wrote it, Huxley was in the process of losing his inner child. Darling of the Jet Set, he was the literary version of their current idol, Cole Porter.
And in the end, the sophisticated public’s jaundiced taste for quick, fun and outré reads made him disposable - to us all.
And worst of all, to his own deep, dreaming subconscious!
Shy, lanky, shortsighted polymath Huxley was born to a family of Eminent Victorians, and was given ample leisure time to read any book he could get his hands on - which was them all.
They would call him a nerd nowadays.
But his reading and shyness disassociated him from the rough-and-tumble world. He had no fixed anchor.
Like so many of us, he had lost his centre of gravity, or had never had one.
But entre-deux-guerres Europe loved him, and adopted him as one of its own. The darling of the Smart Young Things - as the Catholic Waugh tartly put it - he was witty, caustic and irreverent.
He could do no wrong - except in the eyes of social activists, on one side, and believers on the other.
So it was at the midpoint of his career that he took up his pen against the future in Brave New World. If he couldn’t be serious, he could nevertheless shock.
Problem is, he half-loved his own Utopia. And in later life he moved to the U.S.A. and became an early advocate of the Southern California Lifestyle with its casual gurus and myriad conveniences.
When his beloved wife Maria died of cancer, disconsolate and without moorings, he turned to her much younger caregiver for love - a quality conspicuous by the rarity of its occurrence in his hyper-intellectual heart.
They were married at a no-frills marriage boutique in Nevada. They explored Eastern religions through Vedanta, then a current fad. They attended séances and summoned the ghost of his late wife. But all was not well.
His doctor told him some disturbing news: he was going blind. Losing his sight would be losing his most precious pleasure: reading. So his doctor advised him to frequently rest his eyes, by closing them and then applying light pressure from his palms, gently circling them in a counterclockwise motion.
He was very much a faddish man without roots, and much akin in his casual though refined nature to the citizens of the Brave New World. He Needed to read and write. He was a sensual man who needed his pleasures.
But with the approach of the sixties, he received another grim diagnosis. Cancer of the mouth. He started to compare notes with his friend Stravinsky about their planned abstinence from cigarettes:
The weeds that killed him in the end.
***
Carl Jung used to say that our Shadow will visit us in our dreams if we ignore it in our daily lives...
Huxley bought into the mainstream Freudian POV that the asceticism of the great mystics was mere dumb sexual repression (witness his Late anti-Christian rant entitled The Devils of Loudon - now made newly available on Kindle).
And late in life, close to the time of his own death, Huxley dreamt he was floating in a vast orb containing a marvellous city.
But outside the bubble, brutish crowds were howling with derisive laughter at him - yes, him - the untouchable visionary who penned the great Brave New World!
It’s like that late photo of him at his misunderstood California friend Stravinsky’s recording sessions for his own new severely serial and segmented short compositions.
Huxley marvelled at the capacious mind of the composer of the Sacre, but his small-souled trivial brain had no clue of the older man’s unimpeachable moral integrity.
A wannabe mystic, he was a no-show at the starting gate of Heaven because he could never focus his thoughts long enough to shore up enough justifications for a undying Faith.
He awoke from that dream in a panic.
Poor, dear lost soul that he was, there were times when even Soma wouldn't help...
And in his quest for new utopias, he had left the rough and tumble Faith of ordinary poor workaday, believing sods out of his equation.
For his advanced calculations noisily and brusquely precluded the one and only possible healing panacea for his soul - the Simplicity of the Holy Spirit.
For that’s ALL he had ever needed, had he understood Stravinsky and the common folk well.
Maybe more.
***
When he wrote it, Huxley was in the process of losing his inner child. Darling of the Jet Set, he was the literary version of their current idol, Cole Porter.
And in the end, the sophisticated public’s jaundiced taste for quick, fun and outré reads made him disposable - to us all.
And worst of all, to his own deep, dreaming subconscious!
Shy, lanky, shortsighted polymath Huxley was born to a family of Eminent Victorians, and was given ample leisure time to read any book he could get his hands on - which was them all.
They would call him a nerd nowadays.
But his reading and shyness disassociated him from the rough-and-tumble world. He had no fixed anchor.
Like so many of us, he had lost his centre of gravity, or had never had one.
But entre-deux-guerres Europe loved him, and adopted him as one of its own. The darling of the Smart Young Things - as the Catholic Waugh tartly put it - he was witty, caustic and irreverent.
He could do no wrong - except in the eyes of social activists, on one side, and believers on the other.
So it was at the midpoint of his career that he took up his pen against the future in Brave New World. If he couldn’t be serious, he could nevertheless shock.
Problem is, he half-loved his own Utopia. And in later life he moved to the U.S.A. and became an early advocate of the Southern California Lifestyle with its casual gurus and myriad conveniences.
When his beloved wife Maria died of cancer, disconsolate and without moorings, he turned to her much younger caregiver for love - a quality conspicuous by the rarity of its occurrence in his hyper-intellectual heart.
They were married at a no-frills marriage boutique in Nevada. They explored Eastern religions through Vedanta, then a current fad. They attended séances and summoned the ghost of his late wife. But all was not well.
His doctor told him some disturbing news: he was going blind. Losing his sight would be losing his most precious pleasure: reading. So his doctor advised him to frequently rest his eyes, by closing them and then applying light pressure from his palms, gently circling them in a counterclockwise motion.
He was very much a faddish man without roots, and much akin in his casual though refined nature to the citizens of the Brave New World. He Needed to read and write. He was a sensual man who needed his pleasures.
But with the approach of the sixties, he received another grim diagnosis. Cancer of the mouth. He started to compare notes with his friend Stravinsky about their planned abstinence from cigarettes:
The weeds that killed him in the end.
***
Carl Jung used to say that our Shadow will visit us in our dreams if we ignore it in our daily lives...
Huxley bought into the mainstream Freudian POV that the asceticism of the great mystics was mere dumb sexual repression (witness his Late anti-Christian rant entitled The Devils of Loudon - now made newly available on Kindle).
And late in life, close to the time of his own death, Huxley dreamt he was floating in a vast orb containing a marvellous city.
But outside the bubble, brutish crowds were howling with derisive laughter at him - yes, him - the untouchable visionary who penned the great Brave New World!
It’s like that late photo of him at his misunderstood California friend Stravinsky’s recording sessions for his own new severely serial and segmented short compositions.
Huxley marvelled at the capacious mind of the composer of the Sacre, but his small-souled trivial brain had no clue of the older man’s unimpeachable moral integrity.
A wannabe mystic, he was a no-show at the starting gate of Heaven because he could never focus his thoughts long enough to shore up enough justifications for a undying Faith.
He awoke from that dream in a panic.
Poor, dear lost soul that he was, there were times when even Soma wouldn't help...
And in his quest for new utopias, he had left the rough and tumble Faith of ordinary poor workaday, believing sods out of his equation.
For his advanced calculations noisily and brusquely precluded the one and only possible healing panacea for his soul - the Simplicity of the Holy Spirit.
For that’s ALL he had ever needed, had he understood Stravinsky and the common folk well.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Brave New World.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 5, 2018
–
Started Reading
August 5, 2018
– Shelved
August 5, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-41 of 41 (41 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Anni
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Aug 05, 2018 07:59AM
This novel is now seen as the most prescient of that era - even more so than 1984. Thanks for the background info, Fergus.
reply
|
flag
Yes, 1984 had much more to do with Orwell’s political paranoia than with the future - you’re right. Huxley was dead right in so many ways, but today even Noble Savages have a voice, thank heaven!
I'll play Devil's Advocate on this one. I found to my chagrin that a group of bright, literate neighbors could not hack BRAVE NEW WORLD the way they had 1984 a couple of years before that. If I had to "teach" BNW again, I would have to let the group members in on some of the in-jokes ahead of time, like the divinization of Freud/Ford, the syncretism of the Christian cross to the "T" (as in Model T), and other (excuse me) vehicles of satire that are not well understood or remembered today.
Compared to that, Winston and Julia in the fields and the suavely sadistic inquisitor Winston faced in 1984 are child's play.
Compared to that, Winston and Julia in the fields and the suavely sadistic inquisitor Winston faced in 1984 are child's play.
Oh yes, Huxley was wickedly satirical! The intelligentsia loved him, as I once did. But age can bring a deeper humanness to our hearts. Huxley thought his irony appropriate when young. But with advancing years he wasn’t so sure - he craved something deeper. That’s my take, anyway!
I'm reading a bunch of your reviews this morning, Fergus, how much knowledge and moral conviction there is in each of them, yet how artfully casual and good-hearted they are too. A sunny Christian humanism pervades them all!
How nice it is to open GR this morning and see your comment, Bill! It’s largely undeserved - I don’t put half the effort or erudition into my reviews that you do, but it’s so wonderful coming from you - my FIRST GR friend. Thank you.
Nice the detail on Huxley. This was a huge book, a classic, but seems to have faded a bit. Powerful read nonetheless. :) :D Cool Review.
Thanks, Syl. For the details of H’s later life I am indebted to Laura Huxley’s book on her happy years as his wife!
I once met an old German Jewish lady, whose flight from Berlin and subsequent stay in an English boarding school was facilitated and paid for by Aldous Huxley. At the time she didn’t know the identity of her anonymous donor.
What a wonderful story! Yes, in spite of his encyclopedic mind he had an endearing humanity - a quality which cemented his remarkable friendship with the octogenarian Christian composer, Igor Stravinsky. Neither of them could agree with the other’s individual beliefs, but each was fascinated by the other’s genius!
Oh, you’re more than welcome, Martha! If you’d like even more Huxley stories, may I recommend the fascinating reminiscences of his wife, Laura Archera Huxley - in the book This Timeless Moment, with much on the writer’s spooky paranormal pursuits. Indispensable, too, are the conductor Robert Craft’s books on Stravinsky in Beverly Hills, where Huxley was a nearby neighbour! Tidbits galore - especially in the former...
Great review and most crucially a candid summing up of the walking contradiction that was Huxley. I loved the novel and feel just how right that flawed but always intriguing genius was right in envisioning a future with cheap, surface pleasures, social discrimination and loveless sexual relationships overshadowing real art, equality and emotions.
In effect that world was an idealization of his superficial concept of the future zeitgeist. But just look at the demons spawned by the resulting conditioning - faster, newer, better - and JUST PLAIN CHEAP!
I'm reading this book in this Covid 19 period, I could see more out of Aldous Huxley's genius in predicting the human nature and its relation to science and evolution of societies.
This was a fabulous novel, Fergus. I read it in high school and have re-read it a few times since. It is so relevant and prolific. I'm excited for the upcoming TV series.
Wow, had no clue about the series - in a Luddite, TV-less house like ours, such is life! Yes, a great book indeed, so I thought I’d add a bit of Sixties and Seventies talk about Huxley’s primary drivers.
I actually found his book "Island " to be more fascinating.
It was pseudo-religious, Political, but it did contain some truths
It was pseudo-religious, Political, but it did contain some truths
I started it in 1971, but it was way too new-agey for me. At least poor Huxley had found a bit of peace in his life! Thanks for commenting, Tg.
Thank you for the review.
I remember being intensely bored with this book, probably in 8th grade or so, which would make me 14 at the time. Other sci-fi was much more to my taste back then.
I remember being intensely bored with this book, probably in 8th grade or so, which would make me 14 at the time. Other sci-fi was much more to my taste back then.
Likewise, William! At age 14, I was reading Ray Bradbury. Serious Lit masquerading as sci-fi didn’t come on the scene till my early twenties. THEN, though, I loved books like this! Such paranoia reflected my own.
He seemed to enjoy his utopia far too much. His brother was a known eugenicist. It ran in his family.
Thanks for your comments, Lizz! Yes, that era gave birth to a utopian worldview that included many, many such eugenicists - until the horror of wartime atrocities rained on their parade.
Interesting review (but then most of your's are🙂👍) I read "Brave New World" about 20 yrs ago & would like to reread it to see if many of the things he " predicted" came true. Aldous Huxley definitely sounds like a real conundrum ( thanks Google for helping me spell that word..) I found the book both darkly humorous & sad & I'm afraid it's gotten more timely in many ways..😕
Thanks, folks! Huxley was prophetic - but he was also an aristocrat and son of a pivotal Victorian free-thinker - and he could never get his hands dirtied by his novel's inhuman implications. And why not? He was only a flimsy intellectual dreamer (like me)...
Thanks so much, Marquise! Survey the books Huxley wrote, and it's notoriously difficult to pinpoint his character. One thing we do know, is that with him we can only expect the unexpected! He's amazing.
Yours is the best summary of Aldous’s life and search for truth I have read. Thank you. I can only add that his was such a family of intellectuals that he was regarded as the ‘thick’ child, from infant-hood onwards, and this never changed despite his successes. His family even derided his ideas and books to his face, for their lack of intellectual rigour. Poor guy. I hope he died satisfied and happy despite all this, but I have my doubts.
Poor Aldous - yes, I know the feeling! In my old age I myself know I may not die satisfied and happy, but I can at least make my exit engaged in what Derrida calls the Work of Mourning. For in such a Vale of Tears as ours, there can really be no other work!
Oh, thanks so much, Ally - guess I picked up a lot of talk about him in the sixties, because of the great composer Stravinsky's endless esteem for that writer's mind. And Huxley adapted so well to the youth of those days, being an advocate of psychedelics, to my own more conservative horror!
I originally commented that young Aldous used to be chided for not being as clever as some other family members. Though takes of this chiding are true, they did not discourage Aldous. In fact, having the opposite effect. chiding). But your excellent review led me to look into his family some more. Here (unashamedly copied from The Guardian) are some highlights:
“The founder of the Huxley dynasty was Thomas Henry Huxley, born in Ealing in 1825 to a middle-class family fallen on hard times. He benefited from only two years of formal education and is indeed the very image of the autodidact – adventurous, bold, prone to bouts of depression, an omnivorous reader who taught himself Greek and Latin. He eventually became a professor and president of the Royal Society… (and) a famous defender of Darwin's theory of evolution. The worthiest among Huxley's many children was Leonard, an editor and literary journalist, who married Julia Arnold, scion of that other family of Victorian intellectual aristocrats, the Arnolds. She was one of the first women to attend Somerville College, Oxford, and later set up her own school, Prior's Field. Leonard and Julia had four children, among whom was Aldous Huxley…”
That’s quite the family of intellectuals! It was no surprise to me to find (elsewhere) that independent views on Aldous (as opposed to family teasing) were that he was off-the-scale clever, and super-intellectual in his view of the world.
Thanks for motivating me to read some more Huxley soon…
“The founder of the Huxley dynasty was Thomas Henry Huxley, born in Ealing in 1825 to a middle-class family fallen on hard times. He benefited from only two years of formal education and is indeed the very image of the autodidact – adventurous, bold, prone to bouts of depression, an omnivorous reader who taught himself Greek and Latin. He eventually became a professor and president of the Royal Society… (and) a famous defender of Darwin's theory of evolution. The worthiest among Huxley's many children was Leonard, an editor and literary journalist, who married Julia Arnold, scion of that other family of Victorian intellectual aristocrats, the Arnolds. She was one of the first women to attend Somerville College, Oxford, and later set up her own school, Prior's Field. Leonard and Julia had four children, among whom was Aldous Huxley…”
That’s quite the family of intellectuals! It was no surprise to me to find (elsewhere) that independent views on Aldous (as opposed to family teasing) were that he was off-the-scale clever, and super-intellectual in his view of the world.
Thanks for motivating me to read some more Huxley soon…
You know, Cliff, in the sixties he was a close friend of Igor Stravinsky, the composer of Rite of Spring. Close encounters, in Hollywood, CA, where they were neighbours, led Stravinsky - much the older of the two polymaths - to branch out, musically, in new and revolutionary directions in his eighties!
That was the most interesting review I have ever read, Fergus. I think I learned more about the author than I ever imagined possible. Thank you! ☺️