Computer Science

Computer Science ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 194-199.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.210400195

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Academic Knowledge Graph-based Research for Auxiliary Innovation Technology

ZHONG Jiang1, YIN Hong1, ZHANG Jian2   

  1. 1 College of Computer Science,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China
    2 Chongqing Xixintianyuan Data Information Co.,Ltd.,Chongqing 401121,China
  • Received:2021-04-19 Revised:2021-09-08 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-05-06
  • About author:ZHONG Jiang,born in 1974,Ph.D,professor.His main research interests include natural language processing,big data analysis and mining,cloud and network integration technology.
  • Supported by:
    Major Project of Chongqing Higher Education Teaching Reform Research(191003) and New Engineering Research and Practice Project of the Ministry of Education(E-JSJRJ20201335).

PDF (PC)

656

Abstract: Due to the rapid updating of computer knowledge with many ambiguities,it is difficult for students to seek reasonable solutions for independent innovation.As an auxiliary innovation tool,intelligent question-answering system can help students to grasp the frontier of subject development,find out solutions for problems faster and precisely.In this paper,a knowledge graph of scientific research is constructed based on a large-scale database of scientific and technological documents,which realizes an intelligent question answering system for assisting students in innovation.In order toreduce the influence of noisy entities on query questions,this paper proposes an auxiliary task enhanced intent information for question answering in computer domain(ATEI-QA).Compared with the traditional method,this method can extract the question intention information more accurately and further reduce the influence of noisy entity on intention recognition.Additionally,we conduct a series of experimental studies on computer and common datasets,and compare with three mainstream methods.Finally,experimental results demonstrate that our model achieves significant improvements against with three baselines,improving MAP and MRR scores by average of 3.27%,1.72% in the computer dataset and 4.37%,2.81% in the common dataset respectively.

Key words: Deep learning, Intent recognition, Knowledge graph, Question answering

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1]PRAGER J M.Open-Domain Question-Answering[J].Foundation and Trends in Information Retrieval,2006,1(2):91-231.
[2]SUN H,DHINGRA B,ZAHEER M,et al.Open Domain Question Answering Using Early Fusion of Knowledge Bases and Text[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2018:4231-4242.
[3]TONG P,ZHANG Q,YAO J.Leveraging domain context forquestion answering over knowledge graph[J].Data Science and Engineering,2019,4(4):323-335.
[4]LIANG Z P,JI Z,LIU X L.Research on Question and Answer System of Paper Template[J].Journal of Shenzhen University:Science and Technology Edition,2007,24(3):281-285.
[5]YAO X,VAN D B.Information extraction over structured data:Question answering with freebase[C]//Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2014:956-966.
[6]BORDES A,CHOPRA S,WESTON J.Question Answeringwith Subgraph Embeddings[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).2014:615-620.
[7]DONG L,WEI F,ZHOU M,et al.Question answering overfreebase with multicolumn convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2015:260-269.
[8]HAO Y,ZHANG Y,LIU K,et al.An end-to-end model forquestion answering over knowledge base with cross-attention combining global knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:221-231.
[9]XU K,REDDY S,FENG Y,et al.Question Answering on Freebase via Relation Extraction and Textual Evidence[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(Long Papers).2016:2326-2336.
[10]SAXENA A,TRIPATHI A,TALUKDAR P.Improving Multi-hop Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs using Know-ledge Base Embeddings[C]//Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2020:4498-4507.
[11]JIANG H,YANG B,JIN L,et al.A BERT-Bi-LSTM-BasedKnowledge Graph Question Answering Method[C]//2021 International Conference on Communications,Information System and Computer Engineering (CISCE).IEEE,2021:308-312.
[12]KACUPAJ E,PLEPI J,SINGH K,et al.Conversational question answering over knowledge graphs with transformer and graph attention networks[J].arXiv:2104.01569,2021.
[13]XIONG H,WANG S,TANG M,et al.Knowledge Graph Question Answering with semantic oriented fusion model[J].Know-ledge-Based Systems,2021,221:106954.
[14]WU P,WU Y,WU L,et al.Modeling Global Semantics forQuestion Answering over Knowledge Bases[J].arXiv:2101.01510,2021.
[15]SCHLICHTKRULL M,KIPF T N,BLOEM P,et al.Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks[C]//Euro-pean Semantic Web Conference.Cham:Springer,2018:593-607.
[16]HJELM R D,FEDOROV A,LAVOIE-MARCHILDON S,et al.Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximization[J].arXiv:1808.06670,2018.
[17]KIPF T N,WELLING M.Semi-supervised classification withgraph convolutional networks[J].arXiv:1609.02907,2016.
[18]WANG M,SMITH N A,MITAMURA T.What is the Jeopardy model? A quasi-synchronous grammar for QA[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning(EMNLP-CoNLL).2007:22-32.
[19]HUANG W Y.Deep Neural Networks for Legal Question Answering Based on Knowledge Graph[D].Beijing:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2020.
[20]YANG L,AI Q,GUO J,et al.aNMM:Ranking short answertexts with attention-based neural matching model[C]//Procee-dings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2016:287-296.
[21]YU M,YIN W,HASAN K S,et al.Improved neural relation detection for knowledge base question answering[J].arXiv:1704.06194,2017.
[22]SACHAN M,XING E.Self-training for jointly learning to ask and answer questions[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2018:629-640.
[1] XU Yong-xin, ZHAO Jun-feng, WANG Ya-sha, XIE Bing, YANG Kai. Temporal Knowledge Graph Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 162-171.
[2] RAO Zhi-shuang, JIA Zhen, ZHANG Fan, LI Tian-rui. Key-Value Relational Memory Networks for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 202-207.
[3] WU Zi-yi, LI Shao-mei, JIANG Meng-han, ZHANG Jian-peng. Ontology Alignment Method Based on Self-attention [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 215-220.
[4] KONG Shi-ming, FENG Yong, ZHANG Jia-yun. Multi-level Inheritance Influence Calculation and Generalization Based on Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 221-227.
[5] TANG Ling-tao, WANG Di, ZHANG Lu-fei, LIU Sheng-yun. Federated Learning Scheme Based on Secure Multi-party Computation and Differential Privacy [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 297-305.
[6] QIN Qi-qi, ZHANG Yue-qin, WANG Run-ze, ZHANG Ze-hua. Hierarchical Granulation Recommendation Method Based on Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 64-69.
[7] SUN Qi, JI Gen-lin, ZHANG Jie. Non-local Attention Based Generative Adversarial Network for Video Abnormal Event Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 172-177.
[8] WANG Jian, PENG Yu-qi, ZHAO Yu-fei, YANG Jian. Survey of Social Network Public Opinion Information Extraction Based on Deep Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 279-293.
[9] HAO Zhi-rong, CHEN Long, HUANG Jia-cheng. Class Discriminative Universal Adversarial Attack for Text Classification [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 323-329.
[10] JIANG Meng-han, LI Shao-mei, ZHENG Hong-hao, ZHANG Jian-peng. Rumor Detection Model Based on Improved Position Embedding [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 330-335.
[11] HOU Yu-tao, ABULIZI Abudukelimu, ABUDUKELIMU Halidanmu. Advances in Chinese Pre-training Models [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 148-163.
[12] ZHOU Hui, SHI Hao-chen, TU Yao-feng, HUANG Sheng-jun. Robust Deep Neural Network Learning Based on Active Sampling [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 164-169.
[13] WANG Jie, LI Xiao-nan, LI Guan-yu. Adaptive Attention-based Knowledge Graph Completion [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 204-211.
[14] SU Dan-ning, CAO Gui-tao, WANG Yan-nan, WANG Hong, REN He. Survey of Deep Learning for Radar Emitter Identification Based on Small Sample [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 226-235.
[15] HU Yan-yu, ZHAO Long, DONG Xiang-jun. Two-stage Deep Feature Selection Extraction Algorithm for Cancer Classification [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 73-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
渝ICP备16013121号-4
Add:18# Honghu West Rd., Yubei ,Chongqing,China    Post Code: 401121
Tel: 023-63500828/023-67039612/023-67039623
E-mail: [email protected]
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.