Property talk:P4861

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

Charity Navigator ID (obsolete)
identifier for a charitable organisation in the United States, formerly in the Charity Navigator database
Associated itemCharity Navigator (Q1063259)
Applicable "stated in" valueCharity Navigator (Q1063259)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainnonprofit organization (Q163740)
Allowed values[1-9]\d{1,5}
ExampleWikimedia Foundation (Q180)11212
American Red Cross (Q470110)3277
Sourcehttps://www.charitynavigator.org/
Formatter URLhttps://web.archive.org/web/20200923223639/https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=$1
Related to country United States of America (Q30) (See 770 others)
See alsoIRS Employer Identification Number (P1297), GuideStar Israel organization ID (P3914)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total43,877
Main statement9,058 out of 9,040 (100% complete)20.6% of uses
Qualifier2<0.1% of uses
Reference34,81779.4% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4861#Single value, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4861#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Format “[1-9]\d{1,5}: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4861#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Item “IRS Employer Identification Number (P1297): Items with this property should also have “IRS Employer Identification Number (P1297)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4861#Item P1297, search, SPARQL
Item “country (P17): United States of America (Q30): Items with this property should also have “country (P17): United States of America (Q30)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4861#Item P17, search, SPARQL
Type “nonprofit organization (Q163740): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “nonprofit organization (Q163740)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4861#Type Q163740, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4861#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4861#Scope, SPARQL
[edit]

Link is broken. Any idea how to fix it? @Mahir256:--Trade (talk) 07:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Scheme

[edit]

Seems they now use EIN as their primary in-url identifier? And some of the old identifiers no longer work. See 16244 for Curetivity Foundation (Q84523536). Should we mark this as a former scheme and encourage swapping to EIN? BrokenSegue (talk) 20:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]