Property talk:P9107

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• Units
• Scale of values
• List of qualifiers
• Count

number of vaccinations
number of people vaccinated, qualify with "point in time" (P585)

Data type	Quantity
Allowed values	0 ≤ 𝓧 ≤ not applicable
Allowed units	not applicable
Example	COVID-19 pandemic in France (Q83873593) → 510 COVID-19 pandemic in the United States (Q83873577) → 4,660,000
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Chart by item creation date Minimum and maximum Items with highest numeric value Items with lowest numeric value Database reports/Constraint violations/P9107 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 960 Main statement 958 99.8% of uses Qualifier 2 0.2% of uses

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Units: “novalue”: value unit must be one of listed. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9107#Units

Integer: values should be integers (ie. they shouldn't have a fractional part) (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9107#integer, SPARQL

Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9107#citation needed

Required qualifier “point in time (P585)”: this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9107#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL

Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9107#Scope, SPARQL

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9107#Entity types

Range from “0” to “+∞”: values should be in the range from “0” to “+∞”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9107#Range

What in earth?

The property description does not restrict the number to any certain vaccine. Does the property include anybody vaccinated since 1796? –LPfi (talk) 23:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I.e. when used for a country or a city. And does the number include people vaccinated there who have moved away or people vaccinated elsewhere? I think the property should have such specifications at least suggested. –LPfi (talk) 23:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Not the original proposer of the property, but I think it's meant to be more for items about specific notable pandemic/outbreak events, not for the entire history of a disease. So only vaccinations issued in response to such an event, and within the time scope of that event, should be considered, I believe. It also probably makes sense that it applies to the number of vaccinations issued within the area of concern, since that's the most likely statistic to be published by the local health authority. But I guess it'd help if this was explicitly mentioned in the property usage instructions? --Btcprox (talk) 04:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)