User talk:Higa4

Welcome to Wikidata, Higa4!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

Introduction – An introduction to the project.
Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
Community portal – The portal for community members.
User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
Project chat – Discussions about the project.
Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

お茶の水などの項目について

Wikidata:情報価値という規則もありますので、項目作成時に注意された方がいいと思います。ウィキデータ:削除の方針ではNot-notableと荒らしの項目は同列の扱いようですので、労力をかけても即時削除的な扱いをされる可能性がありますので。--Camillu87 (talk) 03:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ご指摘ありがとうございます。「情報価値」についてよく読んでみます。 Higa4 (talk) 04:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- ポイントして頂いたページを読んでみました。私が書いた「お茶の水」などの項目は出典などが不足していてまだ不十分であることは認識しておりますが、少なくともひとつ満たす必要があるとして挙げられている3つの基準のうち「1.ウィキペディア、ウィキボヤージュ、ウィキソース、ウィキクォート、ウィキニュース、ウィキブックス、ウィキデータ、ウィキメディア・コモンズのいずれかのページへの少なくとも1つの有効なサイトリンクを含んでいること」については、画像（現地の写真）をウィキメディア・コモンズにアップして、そちらにリンクしているので満たしているように思えるのですが、いかがでしょうか。また、notable(情報価値)という言葉が意味するところのそもそも論がよくわかっていないので、そのあたりご教授頂けるとありがたいのですが、日本各地には歴史的価値、観光的価値があると考えられていながら、あまり知られていないものが数多くあります。「お茶の水」もそのひとつです。私自身は地域おこしや開かれた政府といった文脈でそういったものに光を当てていくような活動を行っております。（国や自治体が進めている政策をオープンデータ・オープンガバメントなどの文脈でお手伝いするようなことをやっており、ウィキデータを地域資源などのデータの集積場のような使い方ができないかということでいろいろトライしているところです）とはいえ、価値は主観的なものなので、人により受け取り方は違うこともあると思います。たとえば地域にある史跡、記念碑、パブリックアートといったものを個々にウィキデータの項目として登録することはウィキデータとしてはあまり好ましいことではないのでしょうか。そのあたりの感触などお教えいただけますと幸いです。そもそも使い方として間違っているのであれば、あまり無理に使うことは控えたいと思っております。長文失礼しました。 Higa4 (talk) 13:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - まずいという事を指摘したかった訳ではありませんので、誤解されませんように（消される可能性もあるという点のみ承知されてればいい）。私自身もオープンデータには関心を持っていますし、意義も存じています。LinkedDataやDbpediaよりは単純で将来性を感じるので期待はしています。ただ個人的には地域の事象まで扱うのは時期尚早という気がします。観光庁とか自治省、文化庁あたり（あるいはNPO）が、データベースを作ってポイントや物の識別子を発行でもされていれば、可能性はあるとは思いますが。（日本の事象を扱う識別子プロパティが少ないとは感じてます）。私自身もWikidataは日が浅いので、どういうものが削除されるのか私自身も把握できていません。ただ特別ページの「すべての公開記録」のログを見ると（Does not meet the notability policy: content was: ""とかcontent was: "pittore italiano"）という形で削除されています。また削除作業されるのは日本人ではないでしょうから。--Camillu87 (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - 現状を教えて頂きありがとうございます。了解しました。確かに時期尚早な印象はあります。日本に合ったプロパティもいろいろ不足を感じております。消されるかもしれないことを念頭にトライしてみたいと思います。また、notableが情報価値と訳されているのは少し違和感があり（価値という表現は原文のどこにも無く人により判断が異なるものなので、「特筆性」くらいが適当ではないかと感じております）、折を見て井戸端で質問してみたいと思います。大変参考になりました。ありがとうございました。Higa4 (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you Higa4! I see that you have been improving the quality of painting items in Wikidata - reducing the number of "Possible Paintings" from Japanese Wikipedia. As a member of the "Sum of All Paintings" team, thank you. Wittylama (talk) 10:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're right :) I will try reducing the number when I have time. Higa4 (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Status

Higa4, Some of your statements for images like Q63389911 had incomplete copyright status statements, They should be completed as in this edit. Could you fix the items you created? --Jarekt (talk) 14:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. I will update when I have time. Higa4 (talk) 05:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New OpenRefine reconciliation service

Hi!

Thank you for wearing the {{User loves OpenRefine}} userbox on your user page!

Because the existing Wikidata reconciliation service has had severe performance issues recently, I have created a new one which should be faster and more robust. You can add it to OpenRefine in the reconciliation dialog with the following URL: https://wikidata.reconci.link/en/api (or by replacing en by any other language code).

If you have any issues with this new service, let me know.

Happy reconciling! − Pintoch (talk)

Thaks! I see. Higa4 (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tsuki Hyakushi

Hello. Thanks a lot for the Tsuki Hyakushi series ( http://zone47.com/crotos/?p179=3541645 ) you edited. I enjoy it so much. Best regards --Shonagon (talk) 23:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thaks! --Higa4 (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We sent you an e-mail

Hello Higa4,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

名跡について

名跡についてなんですが、「四代目市川團十郎」の形式で揃えるようにお願いできますか？→過去の議論

別の意見があるようでしたら井戸端で表明してください。よろしく。--Afaz (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

議論に気づいていませんでした。了解しました。--Higa4 (talk) 02:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grammatical feature on L293742-F1

Hi,

I see that you used redundancy (Q14942359) as a grammatical feature on ぐい (L293742) for the first form. I don't really know Japanese but wouldn't reduplication (Q221446) be more appopriate?

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Yor're right. I updated. --Higa4 (talk) 13:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asking to support property proposals related to horse ID

Hello, Higa4. I would like to ask for your help regarding property proposals to Wikidata. I proposed property for JBIS horse ID, Umanity horse ID, and netkeiba horse ID. I hope you could support my proposals that you can find them here:

Thank you for your time and have a nice day. Titanboo (talk) 07:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

霊山 (大分県) の座標について

初めまして、Krorokeroroと申します。霊山 (大分県) Q11660707の座標についてお伺いしたいと思います。私は以前、ウィキペディア日本語版記事で設定された座標をウィキデータに転載いたしました。この座標 33° 9′ 30.2″ N, 131° 34′ 22.0″ E（33.158389, 131.572778）は国土地理院地図で確認したところ霊山の山頂を示しております。Higa4さんは 33° 9′ 26.50″ N, 131° 34′ 31.04″ E（33.15736, 131.57529）に変更されました。国土地理院地図で示す山頂よりやや南東を示しています。グーグル・マップでは山頂となります。おそらくHiga4さんはグーグル・マップでご確認され変更されたと思うのですが、私は日本の山については国土地理院地図を優先させるべきではないかと考えております。国土地理院地図が示す座標に戻すべきだと考えておりますがいかがでしょうか？--Krorokeroro (talk) 10:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

確認不足ですみません。はい、私も地理院地図を優先する点は同意です。リバートしておきます。ご指摘ありがとうございます。Higa4 (talk) 10:48, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

今ウィキデータで座標を元に戻されましたことを確認いたしました。どうも有難うございます。日頃のウィキデータやウィキメディア・コモンズでのHiga4さんの御貢献に、この場をお借りして感謝申し上げます。--Krorokeroro (talk) 10:53, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ご丁寧にありがとうございます。 Higa4 (talk) 01:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Verb senses

I see that you've been doing a lot with Japanese verb lexemes of late. You may wish to use predicate for (P9970) on the senses of those verbs to link them to items for the actions they describe. A list of verbs thus linked with this property may be found on this page. Mahir256 (talk) 03:51, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will try when possible. Thanks. Higa4 (talk) 04:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reading patterns and Grammatical features

Hi, thank you for adding forms to japanese lexemes.

I was under the impression that reading patterns shouldn't be denoted as grammatical features. But there is a dedicated property for that here: sinogram reading pattern (P5244). It is meant to be used as a property of a form

It seems to me that the japanese documentation for lexemes lists all possible grammatical features that make sense in japanese, but I am far from being an expert 😅

What do you think? – Shisma (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I see. I also updated L1157261-F2. Higa4 (talk) 23:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question about that: what is 度たく? Does it share all senses with 度ど?

I'm having difficuilties interpreting the gloss from each sense. it would be nice if you could provide item for this sense (P5137) or translation (P5972) (to english) for each sense. So we could figure this out 😬 Shisma (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In Japanese, the shorter the character, the more diverse the meaning. It is very difficult even for Japanese people to disentangle the structure. For example, "度" is described in Wiktionary as this, but even this is just a summary. Anyway, I will try to include the related items or translation when possible.Higa4 (talk) 11:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is it possible that 度たく is actually a different word that just shares the same kanji representation? like 度/たび (L1224197) and 度/たんび (L1224198) – Shisma (talk) 11:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's difficult to explain Japanese structure from scratch. Because I'm not a Japanese language scholar. Kanji is not just a way of representation. It's usually a origin of Japanese word. Higa4 (talk) 11:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay, I was just confused because I couldn't find anything about it. I guess you are right. sorry – Shisma (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Join the lexemes challenge!

hey, I'm happy you contribute so much to japanese lexemes. Have you considered participating in the Lexemes Challenge? Every week a set of concepts ready to receive translations into every language. For instance, this week's topic is Ologists and I have contributed 古生物学者/こせいぶつがくしゃ (L1225579-S1) to show up here.

I usually try to add japanese lexemes but I don't do it when I feel uncertain about a particular word. I would be thankful if you'd check previous challanges if I made a mistake. – Shisma (talk) 09:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

「札所」について

pilgrims' way (Q337912) に「札所」というラベルをつけておられたのですが、これは巡礼路として使われている項目で、地点と道は異なるので外しました。例えば世界の巡礼路を列挙しようとしたりすると日本だけ札所という「地点」が出てきてしまう状況になっています。札所は別途作ることを推奨しますが、詳しく無いので取り急ぎ報告まで。最も近いのはBuddhist site (Q13018311)で英語だと「仏教徒にとって意味のある土地」くらいの訳され方をしていますが、タイの พุทธศาสนสถาน と日本の札所は違うと思いますし、その下位概念というわけでもないと思うので、 subclass of (P279) religious site (Q105889895) として新たに作るのが適切ではないかと思います。Q105889895の下位概念をご覧になってその位置付けが適切そうかご確認いただき、適宜作成、それを使って既存の札所エントリの記述を変更していただければありがたいですがどうでしょうか。--KAMEDA, Akihiro (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

補足：reijō (Q10565932) との関係が私は分かっていません。霊場は必ずしも札所ではないと思いますが、札所も必ずしも霊場ではないですね？霊場が pilgrimage site (Q15135589) の一種となっていますが、pilgrimage site (Q15135589) は巡礼の「終点」という定義が追加されており、この定義を除去すべきか、霊場を pilgrimage site (Q15135589) ではないとすべきか、わかりません、とりあえず、霊場も religious site (Q105889895) だとは記述しておきました。--KAMEDA, Akihiro (talk) 22:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

コメントありがとうございます。以前の編集でうろ覚えなのですが、新規に立項するほど詳しくなかったのでいちばん近そうなものをえらんで別名を追記して使ったのだろうと思います。当方はあまり詳しい知識を持ち合わせていないのですが、KAMEDA様のご指摘は正しいのだろうと思います。より精緻にデータを整備したいのであればKAMEDA様かどなたか、より知識や興味がある方が更新して頂くことを期待します。 Higa4 (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ご返信ありがとうございます、了解です、それではこちらで暇を見つけて調査・更新しておきます。--KAMEDA, Akihiro (talk) 02:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Making it easier to browse the index of the Digital Daijisen

I see that for many of the lexemes you create, you add a JMdict sequence number (P11700) but do not add a Digital Daijisen ID (P11651). I have recently built a tool, Mishramilan, that not only allows different external identifier lists for lexemes to be browsed, but also allows lexemes to be created for individual list entries from within its interface. One of the catalogs I just uploaded is for the Digital Daijisen; once you log in to the tool, you can try searching for words (in kana only, without dashes or interpuncts—so instead of "相知る" or "あい‐し・る" you would type "あいしる") that you plan to add, and you can create your lexemes from there. (You can also search for words, in the same way, to add Daijisen identifiers to existing lexemes as well.) I hope you (and possibly @Shisma:) will find this tool useful. Mahir256 (talk) 16:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also @Mahir256: Wikidata for web has a view that shows you external id properties that an item (or lexeme) is expected to have along with a search form for each of them. Here it is used on 事犯/じはん (L1319532):

before ids were present

after some ids have been added

Shisma (talk) 12:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's a nice tool. I'm sure it will be useful for someone. As for myself, I'm afraid that I might repeatedly copy the sense or something unconsciously from a copyrighted Japanese dictionary to find its ID especially when it's a new lexeme. Anyway, I will try when I have time. Thanks for your information. Higa4 (talk) 12:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]