Wikidata:Property proposal/Amis du Louvre ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amis du Louvre ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Not done
| Description | identifier for an artwork on the website of the Société des amis du Louvre |
|---|---|
| Represents | Société des amis du Louvre (Q3488087) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | work of art (Q838948) |
| Allowed values | [a-z]+(-[a-z]+)? |
| Example 1 | Crucifix by the Master of San Francesco, Louvre (Q3698240) → croix-peinte-du-maitre-san-francesco |
| Example 2 | Nymph with a Scorpion (Q17451496) → nymphe-au-scorpion |
| Example 3 | The Turkish Bath (Q2027662) → bain-turc |
| Source | https://www.amisdulouvre.fr/acquisitions |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | Template:Arts links (Q45312151) |
| Formatter URL | https://www.amisdulouvre.fr/acquisitions/$1 |
| Country | France (Q142) |
| See also | Atlas ID (P1212) |
Motivation
[edit]This new Wikidata property to identify artworks (Q44847669) would further improve our coverage of the Category:Collection of the Louvre (Q21157456). Thierry Caro (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
Notified participants of WikiProject Visual arts. Thierry Caro (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject France. Thierry Caro (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Support David (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)- @Thierry Caro: Comment is a specific property really appropriate? Maybe I'm missing something but it seems there is only a few artwork (something around 200?) and it doesn't seem to be a real database, more just the subpages of a website. Why not just use described at URL (P973)? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- It has become usual for us to have such properties, with URL parts used as IDs. As for the number of entries, it is not the highest we have but there are also, on the contrary, properties with far less content. Thierry Caro (talk) 23:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: are you supporting this property proposal. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony: not really, I'm not convinced by @Thierry Caro: answer (pikachu defense...) so I'm
Oppose. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony: not really, I'm not convinced by @Thierry Caro: answer (pikachu defense...) so I'm
- @VIGNERON: are you supporting this property proposal. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- It has become usual for us to have such properties, with URL parts used as IDs. As for the number of entries, it is not the highest we have but there are also, on the contrary, properties with far less content. Thierry Caro (talk) 23:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Number given here is 200 IDs, already existing links to the resource haven't been mentioned, only one hit in Special:LinkSearch/https://www.amisdulouvre.fr/acquisitions/pandore. Thus costs of this property are higher than use I think. --Marsupium (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)