Wikidata:Property proposal/construction end
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
construction end
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
| Description | date that a construction project ended |
|---|---|
| Represents | construction (Q385378) |
| Data type | Point in time |
| Example 1 | 10 Hudson Yards (Q15264124) → 31 May 2016 |
| Example 2 | Eiffel Tower (Q243) → 15 March 1889 |
| Example 3 | Atomium (Q180901) → 1958 |
| Example 4 | Aswan Dam (Q38891) → 21 July 1970 |
| Planned use | Adding construction start to different buildings |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| See also | Property proposal/Generic#construction start |
| Single-value constraint | yes |
| Distinct-values constraint | yes |
| Proposed by | Joeykentin (talk) |
Motivation
[edit]Now the only way to and the construction time is to add a significant event property and add construction with the a start time and end time qualifiers. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joeykentin (talk • contribs) at 11:00, April 17, 2022 (UTC).
Discussion
[edit]
Support, an important property for construction.--Arbnos (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Oppose what's wrong with the current way? --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 16:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Comment Kindly let us know the current way to help us understand the situation here. BeLucky (talk) 12:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Strong support Better if renamed to construction ended. BeLucky (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)- Comment see Wikidata:Property proposal/construction start (since they go together, the two proposals should be on the same page to facilitate the discussion by the way). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support ~Namita (talk) 22:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose should be a qualifier of significant event if at all so the timeline is self-contained, and the next significant event implies the end of a previous phase. Clutter to say a building construction ended on 31 March, and it was opened on 1 April. Vicarage (talk) 06:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Vicarage, and as set out at more length in my opposition to the 'construction start' property proposal. --Tagishsimon (talk) 03:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose --Gymnicus (talk) 10:38, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Not done no consensus for creation of this property --DannyS712 (talk) 01:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)