Wikidata:Property proposal/does not have effect
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
does not have effect
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Description | usual effect of the general cause absent here |
---|---|
Data type | Item |
Example 1 | heat lightning (Q1993841) → thunder (Q83301) |
See also |
Motivation
[edit]lightning(Q33741) has a nice statement with has effect(P1542)=thunder(Q83301).
heat lightning(Q1993841) should probably have one that notes its absence. I used does not have characteristic(P6477), but that seems suboptimal as that property completes has characteristic(P1552).
I suppose we should find more samples before moving ahead with this. Please contribute. (Add your motivation for this property here.) --- Jura 16:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Try it!
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel ?value ?valueLabel ?subclass ?subclassLabel { ?item wdt:P1542 ?value . ?subclass wdt:P279 ?item . MINUS { ?subclass wdt:P31 wd:Q3231690 } SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "[AUTO_LANGUAGE],en". } } LIMIT 1000
- Some of the subclasses of items with has effect (P1542) might be good candidates for this properties, i.e. cases where the subclass doesn't have the effect whereas the class does. --- Jura 09:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Support It's great when we can express more information like this in a structured manner. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 14:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support Seems reasonable and parallels existing properties. Swpb (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Trade (talk) 20:11, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support, logical property.--Arbnos (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl, Swpb, Trade, Arbnos, Jura1: Done, see does not have effect (P7167) --DannyS712 (talk) 21:29, 13 August 2019 (UTC)