User talk:Cahk/Archive 11

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

→

Archive 15

Happy New Year, Cahk!

Happy New Year!

Cahk,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (talk | stand clear of the doors!) 17:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Orphaned non-free image File:Arms of Adrienne Clarkson.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arms of Adrienne Clarkson.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Cahk,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 808 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Re: User:Parshwanathcorporation

Re your message: Thanks for the note. They blanked their talk page, so I don't think any further action is necessary. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Dianna. Yes this is my first article. I am still learning, all this is still overwhelming but I know it'll get better with practice. Thank you for the tips — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardus Hartzenberg (talk • contribs) 20:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

My wiki page has been deleted. Need help.

My wikipedia page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahid_Hasan has been deleted by Jimfbleak . The reason mentioned is - Unambiguous advertising or promotion: no independent sources, no evidence of notability, self-written vanity page) I am not able to understand what evidence or independent sources do I need to add. I have already added a source - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3888239/?ref_=nmbio_bio_nm

Shahid Hasan is one of the greatest casting directors in bollywood and has cast actors for super hit movies. Details of him on http://www.shahidhasan.in/

He has given lectures at the top acting schools of Mumbai - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnJTDUgxKnQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1PRQNvULss

Do I have to add these Youtube links as sources?

Please help me fix this issue.

Casting.shahidhasan (talk) 08:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

@Casting.shahidhasan: Your username suggest you are the person of the article in question. The page was practically empty when I tagged it. If you subsequently added information, you will need to ask the administrator who deleted the page for more information.--Cahk (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Cahk,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 808 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

AIV reports

Please do not report to AIV when it is not vandalism as you did with User:Thevillahimalaya. The proper place to report company names is to UAA. Thanks. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

@Alexf: This is an ongoing ad nauseum discussion - I have admins that tell me to report to AIV, others to UAA with no consensus whatsoever. If I see an account with username, plus a promotional page, I report to AIV. Otherwise, I report to UAA instead (and even then, I was told unless edits are made, it will not be actioned upon)--Cahk (talk) 11:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

what happened, what did you not like? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polinka123 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing SelfHTML, Cahk.

Unfortunately Mabalu has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

User:DGG has started fixing this page, but it will still need reviewing once the fixes have been implemented, so removing review status for now.

To reply, leave a comment on Mabalu's talk page.

Mabalu (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Changes will be made accordingly time would be much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxMischief (talk • contribs) 15:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Do Go On (podcast) deletion

To address the issue of notability, I included a link to the itunes charts of Britain and Australia on the page: http://www.itunescharts.net/artists/podcast/matt-stewart-jess-perkins-dave-warneke/podcasts/do-go-on/ Additionally, the Do Go On podcast is included here, in a Melbourne Comedy Festival booking website: https://www.trybooking.com/book/event?eid=252377 Both of these sources are in the page's references list.

Hello Internet edit

Dear BethNaught I apologize for my recent action on the page of Hello Internet. I used the editing power to irresponsibly, and I will never put false information there ever again or any other sight. Also, are you a Hello Internet listener ? I have no one that listens to Hello Internet around me so if you want to talk about it sometime I would love to do it, and I guess you know what side I am on in the flag debate Shawdow doom 1234 (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

hey!

sorry im new and i was testing edit wont do any more — Preceding unsigned comment added by OSCAR08 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Edit Tony Ramy

Hello, I need help in editing the Tony Ramy Wikipedia page, which has been protected for editing by the administrator. I need to edit the content so that it can comply with Wikipedia policies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabihsaleh (talk • contribs) 10:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

@Rabihsaleh: You should read User_talk:Rabihsaleh#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_TonyRamy.--Cahk (talk) 19:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for reverting your edit.

I was trying to vote for speedy deletion as the page, I think, is in constructive in itself. I'm sorry for any inconvience caused. Also as soon as I realized my foolishness, I reverted my edit. I hope you understand it was not intentional. Once again sorry. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 10:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Please be more careful with your edits

Greetings, I'm Exemplo347. In this edit, you wrongly identified me as the creator of User talk:Orchids the international school. While it is true that I made the first edit, a simple check of the page would have shown you that your placing of a template on my talk page was not appropriate - and yes, I know this is something that Twinkle does automatically but you are responsible for the edits Twinkle makes on your behalf and you should be checking these edits, which you've failed to do in this case. Please be more careful in the future. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 08:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Creating a Page

Hi Cahk, My Name is Milan Manuel and My User Name is Milanarabian , Will you please help me to publish a business information in Wikipedia?

Thanks & Regards, Milan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milanarabian (talk • contribs) 10:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

@Milanarabian: You are not allowed to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes. I also believe you have conflict of interest with the article subject. Further, if you keep creating the article without addressing the issue, the page will be SALT'd, and thereby preventing you from creating the article again. Please read the messages left on your talk page carefully if you wish to seek more guidance or clarification on the matter. --Cahk (talk) 06:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Saanich.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saanich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Written article about Tiche

Dear Cahk,

I have just created the article which you have checked about Tiche natural mineral water. We want to share the benefits of Natural Mineral water, which has additional impact for human body due to concentration of Calcium, Magnesium and sulphares. We have found many brands of bottled water having their own description https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bottled_water_brands Could you please recommend how we could create our description without considering this as promotional ? We want to describe product (Tiche natural mineral water) more detailed, not to promote the company.

Looking forward to your reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monikavai (talk • contribs) 07:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@Monikavai: The article was copied and pasted from the company catalogue, easily found via a Google search. As such, it is a promotional article as oppose to an information article that you referenced to in your message. I also suggest you look into Wikipedia:Conflict of interest among other policies. --Cahk (talk) 07:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Changes to Andrew Stewart

I am Andrew Stewart. I made changes as the information you have is incorrect. I did not even play high school football! There are so many discrepancies I would prefer the page be removed or at least allow me to correct my own information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gridiron7373 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@Gridiron7373: Could you @Widr: please assist in this matter? Widr is one of the administrators on English Wikipedia, who I think will be better equipped to answer your question. --Cahk (talk) 08:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Logisticmart

I have added the logisticmart page but getting message to delete it. Could you please help me about what changes should i do for make it as we wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajeetlogin (talk • contribs) 10:35, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

@Ajeetlogin: You may wish to read WP:GNG.--Cahk (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RHSC.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RHSC.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy delition on IRM

Hlo bro... The page is not a Promotional ... Please consider my request and delete my Speedy Delition on IRM Page TAk 07:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taktech (talk • contribs)

I mean IRM College TAk 08:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taktech (talk • contribs)

@Taktech: An administrator will review my tag, and decide what to do next.--Cahk (talk) 08:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

International Socety for Research on Emotion

Yes, I removed the speedy deletion banner. I also contested your decision. ISRE is the major international society for emotion researchers, so speedy deletion on the basis of important was quite unwarranted, I am afraid. I added some links to well-known members to make this point more clearly.

Cheers Neal Ashkanasy Nealash (talk) 07:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

@Nealash: You are missing the point. As the article creator, you MUST NOT remove the speedy deletion tag regardless what you think. An administrator will review my tag and decide what to do. Removing the tag as the original author is considered to be vandalism.--Cahk (talk) 07:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

How to Create a page ?

Hi Cahk, Would you help me for creating a paid article on Wikipedia ? if possible . --Milanarabian (talk) 08:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

@Milanarabian: You should read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.--Cahk (talk) 08:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

In response to deletion.

Hello, I noticed that you deleted the Fantoria page and suspected me of sock puppetry—just found out what that means (kind of dig the name yet hate that I was accused). I did not create a new account, but contacted a friend who knows the company and founder who then tried to make better edits. I can see how it may be seen as such (sock p) due to our back and forth on editing, but it was not. We're just newbies. The creation was not for promotional purposes but rather a starting point database for Fantoria, collecting information about it from many sources as a California based publishing company. The name is for both the company and the imaginative world with the same name. It's quite an interesting company and concept that I felt warranted a Wikipedia page that would grow as the company grew. Please have a reconsideration. Please accept my apologies if it came across malicious or if I did anything violating (I was unaware). But I do thing the page has a legit reason for being on Wikipedia. It was made in total support. Thanks Creativecat2016 (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I just read through violations and it's right. We were wrong. It IS two different accounts, but we used the same computer to edit the same page when we should have just used one account. The Kevmix7 account was created to make edits on Fantoria and and grow their page, but all signs point to a clear vandalism after reading about it. We were very wrong—unintentional, but wrong. Please charge that to our VERY blatant novice actions, but not to any intentional maliciousness. I just hope the company page doesn't get branded for our screwup in poorly attempting to help it. Reading through Wikipedia:Notability. Yeah. Totally screwed that one up. Learn by your mistakes... :-/ Creativecat2016 (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@Creativecat2016: Thanks you for your message. Please note sourcing another person solely for the purpose of concurring with the opinions you made is, according to Wikipedia rules, prohibited. I understand you are a new editor, and no further action is warranted at this point. Please be careful when you do create the article - consider creating as a draft, or in your sandbox, or via Article for Creation which would allow for guidance while you create your article.--Cahk (talk) 07:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Contribution: Magnetic Russia

Hello Cahk, Thanks for reviewing my submition named Magnetic Russia. I understand that's it looks like an advertisement, so fast depiction is fair:)

I've created a new text for review. This time I tried to explain what is unique in Magnetic Russia jewelry. This brand with a created in a customer co-creation spirit, and it uses its own unique technology for that. Hopefully it will be as popular as Pandora jewelry very soon.

Here is the new text:

Magnetic Russia is a Moscow based international jewelry brand. It is the first to produce a magnet based modular jewelry. Thanks to magnet locks, customer can co-create its own model from a available parts. Earrings, necklaces and bracelets are often equipped with a magnet base, to add replaceable pendants by custommer's choice. All the replaceable pendants can be used with any model.

Magnetic Russia is founded in 2016 by a entrepreneur and internet marketing professional Devlet Butaev. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DevletButaev (talk • contribs) 14:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

@DevletButaev: There are multiple problems here: First, it is a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest given you are the person who created the brand. In turn, this will almost always been viewed as advertisement. Secondly, the organization does not meet Wikipedia:Notability criteria. Finally, Wikipedia is not a place to promote, it is an encyclopedia.--Cahk (talk) 15:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Request

I don't know why you nominated the page for speedy deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.23.174 (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok sir but its writren on me just for showoff i have posted Varunsonwal (talk) 19:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Help me

why i cant publish my article. i maked it for of our teacher. He is Pannala Dhammissara Thero. it's living person biography. help me its saying after 7 days will deleted. i cant find solution why this is happening. im waiting for your answer soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadeesh Hasitha (talk • contribs) 11:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) @Nadeesh Hasitha:; Cahk properly tagged this article for deletion as missing references. This is a critical policy; see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. You removed this proposed deletion, which is fine, but you did not add any references...which isn't fine. The article still contains no references of any kind to any reliable sources that sustain anything about this person. My own searches on the net have returned nothing in the news and only social media links about this person. As is, the article is a candidate for speedy deletion; there is no credible claim to fame shown in the article. See WP:CSD#A7. You should have a look at Wikipedia:Notability (people). Even if this article is not a candidate for speedy deletion (which, I think it is), it would fail to pass the notability standards we expect and would almost certainly be deleted at a standard deletion discussion. Further, the article is hardly neutral. Referring to him as having a tuneful voice, being very clever, loved by many, a great teacher, etc.; this is all unsupported by any citations and are WP:PEACOCK terms. This article would need to be dramatically rewritten to become encyclopedic, and even so we'd still be left with an article without references to any reliable sources. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: I just realized this is a self-vanity article, and the author had created more than one account to attempt publishing on himself.--Cahk (talk) 15:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Wow. Well, hopefully they read my response above rather than attempt further non-encyclopedic pushes. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

please help me .

thank you sir. tell me simply. Is my article will not delete ? Its real but new to wikipidia. only simply say please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadeesh Hasitha (talk • contribs)

@Nadeesh Hasitha: It became clear to me when you say it is marked for "our teacher", you are really the subject of the article written. (The username on your current account is the birth name of the subject in question) On top of that, you created more than one account to achieve the goal of publishing the article. You should be aware the latter action can get you blocked, and the article permanently protected from being created. --Cahk (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Adminship

I brought you up at a discussion by way of finding you as the most active contributor at WP:AIV for making vandal reports. I now also see you are quite active at WP:UAA as well, and your CSD log appears to be solid. I haven't vetted you, but based on the above it would seem you would very much benefit from having the admin toolbox at your disposal. Is there any particular reason you are not an administrator? --Hammersoft (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: Thank you for the kind note. My account (post November 2015) has almost exclusively been for tagging advertisement, spam, attack pages, etc. Unlike most administrators, I am not very much of an article creator, and mostly, the tools I have so far have been enough for my purpose. While I like the idea of just delete and block as I go through the logs, having an administrator review my tags before blocking/deletion helps as well :-) --Cahk (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Certainly there are times when having another set of eyes on something is useful. But, this is not necessary in 100% of cases. In the group where it is not necessary, using admin tools reduces the workload of other admins having to work through reports. For example, if you had the tools, your latest three reports to WP:UAA could have been blocked right off [1][2][3]. Instead, you spend a bit more time yourself reporting it, and take time from administrators who then need to review it and block them. See my point? You've made so many reports, it's obvious this sort of thing is of interest to you. Based on cursory review, it also appears you are making good choices as well. Having the admin tools would be easier for you, and easier for the project. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: I suppose. I'd think there may be some opposition if I were to be nominated, on the basis of article creation and narrow scope of focus on Wikipedia.--Cahk (talk) 20:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• 29 articles to your credit I think would be quite satisfactory for those that want to see article creation. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: Haha ... I don't object to being an administrator. Although as you know, it is not up to me. Maybe you should consider the same, as I've seen more than a few comments on your talk page ...--Cahk (talk) 07:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

• Well, that's one way of getting back at me for suggesting it to you ;) --Hammersoft (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for mistaken an will delete my article.

sorry sir . this not special form me. i try to learning from jere how to be a clever in vikipidia i maked account in here for it. not a liar. i was get mistaken and i maked account today morning. i was needed only help someone. sorry for mistaken. i will delete this article soon as i can. how ever i do not know how do delete. i learn thats all from youtube. i will learn and will delete. thank you for your help. pleace upon you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadeesh Hasitha (talk • contribs) 16:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Christian McBride

Hi. I am new to Wikipedia and would like To understand how I create a Biography page? Given your experience could you explain this to me please? Christian McBride (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

@Christian McBride: You will find plenty of information at WP:USERPAGE. You cannot use your user page to promote or advertise your business. --Cahk (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

UAA Reports

Thanks for your multiple reports of users to UAA. I just wanted to remind you that, in line with WP:ORGNAME users are unlikely to be blocked for being promotional unless they've also made promotional edits. Some of your recent reports, such as User:IIFT INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FASHION TECHNOLOGY and User:Kolam Foundation appear to fall into this category. In my view User:Allianceairindia is right on the edge, as they've edited a page about their own company but it wasn't overly promotional - however I know other admins interpret the policy more sharply than this so I've left that one alone.

Thanks again for your hard work. GoldenRing (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

@GoldenRing: As you mentioned, there are no clear consensus on how to deal with this issue. I've had multiple, ad nauseam discussion with editors and administrator in the past. I've decided to just report them anyway, and let an admin decide what they want to do.--Cahk (talk) 22:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Fair enough. Keep up the good work. GoldenRing (talk) 09:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

But there actually is consensus that reporting users with no edits at all for mild violations is not the right approach and wastes admin's time. It's been in the directions for reporting at UAA for about eight years. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: You may recall we had this discussion about half a year ago, in which you said "Frankly, the best solution is to keep doing the needed work of making reports, and leave responding to reports to admins." User_talk:Cahk/Archive_10#.22Discussing.22_with_accounts_that_have_not_edited.--Cahk (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

That was a slightly different issue, but you wil note that my message there is actually completely consistent :"we 'usually wait before taking any action on an account that has no edits, except in the most extreme cases." Beeblebrox (talk) 20:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: Here's the dilemma (for the billionth time): I see a promotional username, I don't leave a warning template on their talk page per your November message. Reporting to UAA, may result in block (per some admin), warning (per some admin), put in the holding pen (per some other admin) or nothing will happen (per some other admin). The simple solution would suggest do nothing because I don't see how this is a "consensus" when I am told to do different things by different admins. I have no intention of adding additional work for others, so if it's easier to butt out, then so be it. --Cahk (talk) 20:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

That's perfectly fair. I know as well as anyone that who handles your UAA report is at least part of what the response is, and I sympathize with your position. I wish it weren't' like that, but it is as you describe.

The truth is that I and a few other admins who regurlarly work UAA have been on a bit of a crusade to stop users from reporting most users with no edits, and my posting here was part of that effort. In fact I've become a bit of an evangelist for this causes. I know you are reporting things you see in good faith and are trying your best to follow what appears to be ever-changing standards based at least partially on who responds. I am trying to work this from the other end as well, attempting to raise awareness of this with other admins. It isn't an optimal situation and I'm fumbling thorough it as best I can, please don't let my comments discourage you from continuing to work in this area. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: I understand where you are coming from. As you wished, I have decided to step away from that arena altogether because I can't be bothered to continue this ad nauseam discussion. I have had this discussion with at least 5 editors just this year alone, nevermind the countless times last year. The re-hashing of the whole scenario each and every time is getting very tiring (forget about finding diff's - they are buried in my contributions so deep they'll never see the daylight again). I'll be focusing on AIV instead. --Cahk (talk) 08:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

removal of page?

Hi Cahk,

I am new sorry for not following the correct process to edit. I would like to remove the page if possible. How can I do that? Julia does not want a profile on wikipedia.

Thanks for your help Bjjk Bjjk (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bjjk: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social network. The article subjects do not get to say whether they wish to have or not have an article about themselves. You can read WP:BIODEL here, but given Ms. Horvath's known publicity, I doubt she qualifies as "non-notable subject".--Cahk (talk) 08:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Cahk,

Ok I understand.

How can i remove all references to her gender identity. She no longer identifies as transgender and is feeling distress about the page from this perspective. it is not about there being a page it is about the references to previously disclosed information during her transition as transgender. She no longer identifies as this but as a female.

Thank you for your help Bjjk Bjjk (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bjjk: The issue with what you are saying is that the sources that I can find on Google suggest nothing wrong with the information presented in the article (with a very quick scan only). In particular, it is not difficult to locate previously written newspaper articles online about Ms. Horvath. You can post your message on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, but I am not certain the result will be any different?--Cahk (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Cahk, I think having it written in the wiki page is more prominent than searching for articles or the links at bottom of the page, on Ms Horvath where her previous disclosures about her gender identity at that time are disclosed. thanks for your help. Bjjk Bjjk (talk) 08:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Re: Li Yi Tong

Thanx for alert on lack of refs. We've added 8 citations. Much obliged.--Zhang-ZQ (talk) 13:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Charlene McMann

Too many eyes apparently on that article to allow much cited information to be deleted. By the time I'd read the new "entry" it had already been restored and page protected. Thanks for the heads-up. Cheers!   Aloha27  talk  13:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

• Cahk and Aloha72, I saw the mention of me re her attempt to remove material. I did rewrite the article last year to meet WP:V but I was in favor of deletion. Does anyone have any objection to me bringing a new AfD since the last two (a year ago) resulted in a no consensus close? I know her tactics deserve no sympathy but this person never should have had a BLP in the first place.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) So after a Keep and two N/C's we'll go through the AfD a FOURTH time? Wikipedia policy dictates that notability need not be an ongoing thing. That is to say an individual who was a public figure (in Chicago no less, not some backwater burg), was notable then and subsequently was convicted of taking a great deal of cash on multiple occasions and made LESS notable? Not 100% sure I see the logic there to tell you the truth.

I believe another editor nailed it when they stated "If consensus doesn't go your way, you do NOT get to keep repeating the discussion until it reaches the conclusion you want. There are good reasons why nominations of this kind are speedily closed and I'm not thrilled to see milquetoast sysops pussyfooting around with it. (2) If you write an article about your wife and get Wikipedia to publish it, you do NOT get to remove that article just because it suddenly starts to tell the truth. (3) Our BLP rules prevent us from publishing unsourced negative information about living people. Well-sourced negative information about living people is just fine, and well within scope for Wikipedia." Regards,   Aloha27  talk  23:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

@Milowent: Thank you for taking the time to write to both of us. While I can see where you are coming from, I must vehemently object to another AfD. Wikipedia has rules, policies and procedures in place to keep things in order. Ms. McMann (excuse me for not even wanting to count) broke so many of them that NONE of her messages should even be considered. As to my reasoning? Editors will not be as sympathetic this time around with Ms. McMann's attempt removal AFTER a community-imposed site ban. Don't forget, the ban was instituted right after the last AfD closed with no consensus. Also, admin @Oshwah: has provided an alternate avenue for Ms. McMann to pursue if she so desires (not that I think it will work in her favour any better, but alas). I also agree with the passage that @Aloha27: quoted, specifically "you do NOT get to remove that article just because it suddenly starts to tell the truth."--Cahk (talk) 01:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

• LOL, you guys have strong opinions! The keep close is from 2011 with only three "votes". The two subsequent "no consensus" closes show that many people started to realize what has always been true -- that this one-time media whore never was notable. The last no consensus close was over a year ago. I'm not in a rush to create a drama-filled AFD, though.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 12:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Milowent: Ms. McMann was provided with another avenue she can pursue that is outside of the (wider) Wikipedia community. It is her decision if she so wishes to, and we shouldn't have to go through another cycle of never ending AfD. --Cahk (talk) 15:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

entry Pavel Bělíček

Hello,

I agree with you in your principal reminders implying that tedious autobiograpical comments should be avoided as irrelevant. Today I made another attempt to customise my Wiki entry and reduced the initial autobiograpical introduction to the least possible mimimum.

I will be obliged to you for further comments on my text--Pavel Bělíček (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

page edits

Hi Cahk, I am CEO of Viewster and recently attempted to make corrections to the company's web page. The corrections were not approved. Can you please advise on the process of how to do that? Thank you, Tzvetan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thorozov (talk • contribs) 09:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Thorozov: First, you shouldn't be editing a subject that you have Conflict of interest. Secondly, the edit I reverted was clearly promotional/non-neutral in tone, in comparison to the original texts.--Cahk (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Boleyn. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Thodi Khatti Thodi Hatti, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Boleyn (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

my objective was not to write an authobiography, so I deleted paragraphs in the introductory passage Life Career and reduced its text to the least possible minimum.

I also added a chapter External references quoting criticism and sources expressing other people's opinions about my works.

A proficient appraisal of my works can be found in the university encyclopaedia and its entry by Jiří Severa: Pavel Bělíček (pseud. Martin Kobalt, Josef Vodvaz). Spisovatelé a literatura. Filosofická fakulta University Palackého v Olomouci, 17. 3. 2013.

Thank you for valuable instructions

Pavel Bělíček Pavel Bělíček (talk) 03:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

@Pavel Bělíček: An administrator has already responded to your question on the Undeletion board ... frankly I don't have much to add.--Cahk (talk) 08:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hello,

Our objective is not to use Wikipedia as an advertisement. What can I do to improve it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samjoy19 (talk • contribs) 13:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@Samjoy19: While that may not be your objective, you should read WP:COI. The article you created was clearly promotional given the language used (i.e. our services, we offer, etc)--Cahk (talk) 17:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Completely forgot to tag it as user. Thanks for noticing

Jaywjay03 (talk) 18:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Need help

I have revised all the details required by you for the article you proposed for deletion. Now, could you review it and approve it. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haroonimtiaz (talk • contribs) 09:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Your edits were reverted by one of our robots because you cited Twitter. Your social media sites are not considered a reliable source -- you need to cite professionally-published sources that are not affiliated with you. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Remember WP:ATD please

Hi there. When patrolling new pages for speedy deletion, such as Yandex.Market, remember that a) if an admin declined the speedy once (as I did), they usually have considered all possible criteria, not just the one it was tagged as, so re-tagging it under a different criterion is usually not helpful and b) WP:ATD is a policy that applies to speedy deletion as well. If you can turn the page into a redirect to the notable owner of the subject, then this is almost always preferable to speedy deletion. Regards SoWhy 08:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

@SoWhy: I see now a CSD has previously been declined. For some reason it still showed up as unreviewed so I mistakenly treat it as a new page. --Cahk (talk) 08:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

forgotten to think completely.

@Cahk: Hi, this is Yomaru Kasuga. I was created the page last ime, with her name is Irene Yeh, and last time was finished. Then I must completely forgotten to add the content such as references or external links. So now i've added the external link from the article of irene yeh's taiwanese mandopop singer is Blog of Irene Yeh's Music World, translates in english from chinese is 葉璦菱的音樂世界." I hope you to concern about it . Yohann Martin Navarro (talk) 09:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Ashutoshniranjan.

That wasn't actually G11 because it was about Interactive voice response. The tone was too informal though. On first reading it looked G11. I deleted the thing because it was U5 and would have wound up A10 if it had found it's way into article space. Cheers, Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

NPR

You were grandfathered into the New Page Reviewer group because it was thought that you had sufficient experience. This is not demonstrated at Nguyễn Long. Please review the tutorial again at WP:NPP. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

@Kudpung: I will be first to admit, despite having over 10 years of experience here, I make mistakes. If a mistake was made on my part, I don't mind you letting me know. However, I take great offence to your bitey notice about my 'lack of experience' with NPP. If my CSD log doesn't demonstrate understanding, then I am really perhaps not suitable to be a NPP reviewer. --Cahk (talk) 15:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not misquote me - I did not say 'lack of experience'. I was alluding to the fact that it only took me 30 seconds to complete your review of that particular page by finding out what the article was about and then correctly tagging it for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

@Kudpung: I wouldn't take offence if you let me know that article should otherwise be tagged as G11. You may wish to re-read your message "thought that you had sufficient experience ... This is not demonstrated", in light of the fact you said I should review the tutorial. The combined message is I lack the experience. I am not sure how one is to otherwise interpret your message. --Cahk (talk) 16:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Cahk,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 808 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Nick Khronic

My article was deleted due to the page not having significance/justification of why it should be in that subject. Is there anything I can do to get my page republished? It was about a rap recording artist from a off stream race(ethnicity) with lots of significance to the subject "hip hop, rap, etc". Thousands of fans would be looking for this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydrobodone (talk • contribs) 05:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

@Hydrobodone: The subject of the article is not a notable musician. A Google search revealed mostly self-published/Social Media accounts. You may wish to review the WP:MUSIC page about what makes a musician notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia.--Cahk (talk) 07:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

dear admin

please... i give some information that is interesting.., i know about how to make nice article, i need a backlink from wikipedia.., please.. we must deal right?, i gift some information that is not just a boring article, but is interest article.., so please.., dear admin give me some backlink.. thanks you... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferizamia (talk • contribs) 09:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

My page was deleted

Can you un-delete is and tell me what is wrong with it, I will fix it.I just signed up I don't know things.-Dan1sant

See User talk:Dan1sant#Reply Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

I was thare

Should I take off that stuff about Roadkill? He still could use letters even tho he is only doing a nickel. Time stretches out in thare even though he could do 5 years standing on his head. Anyway I can leave a link to the BOP website to prove he is thare. As far as his old lady is concerned she got what she deserved. At court Roadkill said "I ain't proud of what I done but I sure as shit ain't ashamed.". He just grinned at the judge like the cat that got the cream. Now I was not in the steam room but apprently they had half a dozen co-eds in thare naked and they were all doing nitrous but I wasn't thare for that.

==  Page undeleate ... ==

Hi ...

It is nice to be in touch with you ... I would like to undeleat my page ... and for future refrence ... and this page could be my biography ... and this page could be category at biography, author, books, innovation, creative, culture, ... and Merci ... It is nice to receive your next email soon ...

Thankfully ... _______________________________________ Eng. Yasir I. Kashgari

Mobile: (Redacted) Jeddah Saudi Arabia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ykashgari (talk • contribs) 13:04, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

About TRT World Editing

The editing I'm trying to do is for correcting the wrongly written content for TRT World channel and its position during july 15th. the content that is available for viewers right now is not correct and also not objective. This content has the sole aim to ruin TRT World's reputation. If you had red through the content I was trying to edit, mine was the actual objective one that only includes technical and official information that should be the Wikipedia page for any tv channel. please take a second thought on how the content looks now and how it looked when I edited — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erdembaltaci (talk • contribs) 07:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

@Erdembaltaci: There are numerous issues with your edit. For one, you removed information that was sourced. It may be historic information, but it should not be removed without a good reason. Second, your edits are clearly promotional in nature. "With its experienced staff and a wide perspective, it is a pioneer of positive change in the world by placing people at the centerz of news." and "offers all the functionality of our website in one convenient package, including live streaming and is available for IOS and Android." Finally, based on the edits you made, there is a reasonable doubt as to whether you have a conflict of interest as to the subject matter you edited.--Cahk (talk) 17:26, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Page deltion

Sorry I have just realised I need to reference my page and haven't finished doing so yet but if you could Undelete it and give me access I can do that now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipagecreator10 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

So can I please add my references? Wikipagecreator10 (talk) 08:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Wikipagecreator10: Your creation has been redirect by User:Deb. You may wish to leave that admin a message to followup.--Cahk (talk) 08:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion

Please remove tag please make my page active Ashishsharawat (talk) 12:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

I did have why he was Important

I stated he was YouTuber of 100k, he is famous for playing the game hearts of iron IV, and u can see his youtube channel [HERE] to see the evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinesomeMC (talk • contribs) 08:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

@MinesomeMC: Just because someone has 100K followers on Social Media, it doesn't make that notable for Wikipedia purposes. Most importantly, the article failed WP:NRV.--Cahk (talk) 16:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Embassy of North Korea, London

It seems like maybe MrCastaigne (talk · contribs) might be the same editor as There's bomb at the North Korea embassy in London (talk · contribs) based on these reverted edits?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 07:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@DoctorWho42: You are correct. I've made a report to AIV.--Cahk (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@DoctorWho42: @Cahk: User Non Disclosure (talk · contribs) made the same edit as well. Isn't it true that we should report bomb threats like those to the police? 200.58.126.84 (talk) 08:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators will take care of the matter.--Cahk (talk) 08:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

I hope the vandal will get caught. Making bomb threats are super-duper pathetic. 200.58.126.84 (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hi, having trouble establishing a wikipedia page for myself as a las vegas based musician, I currently tour perform and record with multiple bands and have media coverage. Do you have any suggestions as to how to establish a page for this for wikipedia to document it without running into issues?

I may have over-edited it, as I am just learning how to use wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earl E. Smith (talk • contribs) 08:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Earl E. Smith: You will want to review WP:MUSICBIO. As you are the subject of the article, it is highly discouraged that you write your autobiography. The bands you mentioned in your article resulted in very little, if at all, search results. Your name via a Google search also resulted in non-significant results.--Cahk (talk) 08:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello

I went up on the hill is not a song written by an artist it is a traditional ringplay song in the Bahamas that children sing. I repeat it is a well known child song no one knows it's origins but it is native to the Bahamas.

@CreateBahamas: Could you please find more than one source about this particular song? There is no mention anywhere else on a Google search besides the one website you cited.--Cahk (talk) 08:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Reference Links

I have reference Links to The bands that I have performed in, multiple video and musical references as well. I will include them as references, Reverb nation link, etc. If I post better references, will it make it easier?

Hi

I am a Bahamian so I know the song very well I grew up singing it. There is not a lot of information about our culture online, so I posted what I could find.

Okay I see, you are just looking for references and source material. I will make sure to include links and references. just don't flag my page before I even get the chance to finish it!

Thanks I appreciate the help, as the youngsters say "I'm new at this bro" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earl E. Smith (talk • contribs) 08:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Selene (horse)

It's notable, but it's a dam, not sire. Xx236 (talk) 09:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	We'll you've kept me busy for the last fifteen minutes or so! Thanks for finding all those spam accounts -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Please wait until I provide the references, Cahk!

I am currently getting the draft reviewed by the person in question, Vivek Shanbhag, himself. I will provide citations and references and more as soon as I get an okay from him. You are welcome to mark my page as a draft until then(in fact, I do not intend to make it public until I complete it). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanaha.jar (talk • contribs) 09:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Petrit Ceku changes

Dear Sir,

these changes have been made in favour of maestro Petrit Ceku. As I am his agent he asked me to change in order to keep his wiki site updated with true informations. Please keep the changes I have done. thank you, Renata — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rglojnaric (talk • contribs) 09:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@Rglojnaric: First of all, you have a conflict of interest to the article's subject. If you are indeed his agent, you are likely paid for managing his affairs, and as such, you are violating the paid editing guidelines of Wikipedia. Secondly, phrases such as "his exquisite sensibility and expressiveness have attracted and engaged audiences worldwide" are promotional, and biased in nature. Finally, the article's subject does not get to dictate what goes on or not on the Wikipedia article page.--Cahk (talk) 09:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiLove

DoctorWho42 has given you a Toast sandwich! Bread, toast, and bread promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Toast sandwiches are wonderfully delicious! They are made by putting a thin slice of toast between two thin slices of bread with a layer of butter, and adding salt and pepper to taste. Its origins can be traced to the Victorian years. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a toast sandwich, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of toast sandwiches by adding {{subst:Toast sandwich for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 06:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!

	A Helping Hand
	Thank you for reminding me to use citations! I completely forgot! I'm still new to Wikipedia and can use all the help I can get! Thanks again! BasketballFanatic (talk) 11:06, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Machakos University(Official)

I blocked the account for being promotional (thanks for reporting!). In the future, you'll want to report these kinds of accounts (username violations, promotional editing with promotional username, etc) in UAA instead of AIV - AIV is for reporting vandalism. Anyways, just wanted to let you know. Thanks again for all the hard work you do! Cheers :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Please see the discussion here [4] as to why I reported it to AIV instead of UAA.--Cahk (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

10-4. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Joseph Hanisch von Greifenthal

Hi - just a courtesy not to say that the article on Joseph Hanisch von Greifenthal which you flagged as 'not English' has now also been flagged as a potential hoax. I've left my observations on its Talk page, and on that of the user. Regards from the UK Nick Moyes (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Cahk, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
• Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

• Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
• The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
  • User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

• Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Ben Dixon

I worked with Ben Dixon personally!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliegrima (talk • contribs) 13:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Emmanuel Chiedozie Ejimadu

Hello my friend my name is Emmanuel I saw your replay on my profile I'm very happy For you advise ,plz help me I would like you to help me To perfect my profil Emmanuel Chiedozie Ejimadu Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmanuel chiedozie ejimadu (talk • contribs) 21:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

@Emmanuel chiedozie ejimadu: First of all, you are discouraged from creating an autobiography. Secondly, it's been too long since the deletion for me to remember what your article was about - in any event, it's best to not create a page about yourself unless you have amply evidence to back up claims of notability.--Cahk (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Why it is non talkable material, he is an artist right — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkumar5678 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

@Arunkumar5678: Please see WP:FAKEARTICLE--Cahk (talk) 18:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

About the page

The information which I have given is not a fake one right, you can verify with the links also right Arunkumar5678 (talk) 04:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

@Arunkumar5678: The issue is not that the information is "fake". The issue is using a user talk page, as though it is an actual article that's the issue. If you actually read the information I provided in the link, you should not be asking this exact question.--Cahk (talk) 09:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

I'll spare you the barnstar

But again thank you for your quality reports to AIV - why aren't you an admin yet? -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 10:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

@There'sNoTime: I was not screened forward in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll/Poll candidate search/Poll candidates holding pen.--Cahk (talk) 08:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Page for Love And Care for People

Hi Cahk,

I am currently working for Love And Care for People , an organization dedicated to fight against Family Abuse, based out of Ireland. I need to create a Wikipedia page for it.

Kindly guide me how to do it. Thanks , Richa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richrera (talk • contribs) 15:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

@Richrera: Please see Wikipedia:Your_first_article#Are_you_closely_connected_to_the_article_topic.3F and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. If you require specific guidance on creating an article, please head to Wikipedia:Teahouse.--Cahk (talk) 17:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm IVORK. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Eastman auto and power - Automotive, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

—  IVORK Discuss 08:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Scam?

I wasn't scamming on my personal page I put that there because i wanted to make a wiki page that everyone see for my nation on Garry's Mod so im remaking it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prez345 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

@Prez345: I did not tag your page as a scam. Instead, I indicated it is a hoax because it was modeled like an actual country's page. Wikipedia is not a web-hosting service, and as such, un-encyclopedic is subject to removal. Cahk (talk) 09:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

It is actual country i wasn't web hosting i already got a website so im chill. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prez345 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Careful

Please be careful when reporting vandals: [5]. I have restored my report: [6]. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

@DVdm: Oh? I am not sure what happened with Twinkle ...--Cahk (talk) 07:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I've had the same with Huggle a while ago. Probably an edit conflict that failed to fire. All are blocked now, so no harm done . - DVdm (talk) 07:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

@DVdm: I see ... thanks for letting me know!--Cahk (talk) 07:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Adalwulf Mustang

Hey, I noticed you deleted my page that I was in the process of writing. I am still a novice writer and new to Wikipedia but I do think you'll find that I did not violate any of the Rule and Guidelines. I'm not too familiar with the community of writers here but getting a page deleted whilst in the middle of it being written is quite weird.

Don't worry I know it's usually instinctive to just mark pages for deletion but this is my first page and one that I thought is necessary thanks to this man's contributions and donations to cities in northern Italy where I had visited last week. I had tried to search him up on Wikipedia after seeing a statue of him but it came up short and so I jumped on the idea. I would like to finish working on it please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadrancher (talk • contribs) 09:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

@Deadrancher: While I nominated the page for deletion, it was an administrator who deleted the page. If you wish to create an article as a draft, you can use your sandbox (next to the talk link on the top right hand side of your page) or through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation. You can also consult with the Wikipedia:Teahouse for more information.--Cahk (talk) 17:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Nooshin Moradi

Dear Cahk hi, This is Vicky, my friend and I have started writing on wiki from 2013 and since that, On that we had no idea how to do it, so we had come back and edit and adit and improve the article which we started with. The user called Bill user:Wtwilson3 was helping us at the time. He was gentle and kind and guided us step by step so we could happily publish our first article which we're always proud of (Credit to wikipedia) Anyway after some years I came back to write another article about a well known person (I know she is not Gucci or Givanchi ) but ofcours she is a great designer with thousands of followers and an her designs are my favorite. After my first post, it was immediately tagged for delectation by the User:Alex Shih with no communication. I checked the wikipedia's 8 rules again and then clicked on the "Contest this speedy deletion" and explained the reason that I believe my article should not be deleted. I was wondering instead of offering some help and support, how my post was marked like an absolutely dangerous thing!! this morning less than 24 hours of my message, I realised that my article has completely removed by Alex Shih with no explanation. I am very disappointed right now and I think this action was unfair, the person didn't offer me any help to edit my mistake (if I had any) and deleted the article which my friend and I spent hours of time to write. Dear Cahk, if you have access to our written article, please can you be kind and have a look at it and let us know if it has mistakes or weakness that we can work on and improve, I really appreciate it. I undrestand that wikipedia has become massive over the last few years, but I still hoping that people working in there stay helpful and supporting as past. There were people like Bill and Ibrahim who helped me a lot with my previous article which I really appreciate.

Best Regards {{{Vicky}}}

@Boltonart: I see that Alex has responded on your talk page. Unfortunately only administrators can retrieve deleted pages so you may wish to write to Alex about that.--Cahk (talk) 08:34, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Cahk, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

• Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
• Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

I have put references on my post but still it is considered for deletion

What seems to be the matter here? I have put 15 references and still it says that it will be considered for deletion. And these are credible newspaper references, at that. Help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivekcaravan (talk • contribs) 12:18, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

@Vivekcaravan: There were no references at the time I tagged the article. In any event, the tag has been removed since citations were added.--Cahk (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use of File:Coat_of_arms_of_Canada.svg

Hi Cahk. File:Coat_of_arms_of_Canada.svg is licensed as non-free content which means that each use of it on Wikipedia needs to satisfy all ten non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP. One of these criteria (more specifically one part of one of these criteria) is WP:NFCC#10c which says that a separate specifc non-free use rationale which clearly shows how each of these ten criteria are satisfied needs to be provide for each use. Furthermore, WP:NFCCE says that it is the burden of those wanting to use or retain non-free content in such a way to provide a required rationale for said use; otherwise, the file may be removed for lacking a rationale. So, if you feel that the non-free use of this file in articles such as Coats of arms of North America and Gallery of country coats of arms is justified, then please provide the required rationale for each use. You should be aware, however, than the use of such logos in image galleries or for individual entries in list articles is pretty much almost never considered policy compliant per WP:NFG/WP:NFLISTS because such usage is considered to be decorative and fails WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. However, at the very least you need to provide a non-free use rationale so that it can be evaluated and discussed at WP:FFD if necessary. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Sri Aurobindo

Hi, can i know the reason why you reverted my reverts :) ! in this page ? Shrikanthv (talk) 07:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

@Shrikanthv: It looked as though it was vandalism to me. "Left his body" instead of "died" ... --Cahk (talk) 07:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Ha yes that one, yes I understand Shrikanthv (talk) 07:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

About মুরাদপুর শাহী মসজিদ

Hi Cahk,
This article is about a mosque in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It doesn't appear to be an obvious WP:COPYVIO. It may have some credible claim of significance. As it's not in English, I don't think we can make a WP:A7 speedy decision right away. I've tagged it for translation.
(Looking at what I just wrote, I apologise for wiki-linking things you already know).
Maybe we might try asking about this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bangladesh?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

@Shirt58: CSD'd as A3. No follow-up required.--Cahk (talk) 07:00, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

And that's fine with me. I gave my opinion, which I now think was rather unpersuasive. Another admin disagreed. I agree with you. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Send for Help Group

Perhaps you can look at Send for Help Group and its associated articles and figure out what the best course of action is--AfD for all? Merge the three into the one? User:Mean as custard might have an interest in this as well. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Cahk, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

• On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
• Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Editing an article

What specific changes need to be made in order to keep my article as an informational source on Wikipedia (about Alpha Corporate Sales and its new methodology called shock-therapy opening in enterprise sales training)??????????????????????????????????????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiBusinessSource (talk • contribs) 08:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

CLIPNOVA

Hi, How to make a Profile of CLIPNOVA.com on WIKIPEDIA. Please help.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clipnova (talk • contribs) 07:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of article "Nivedhithaa Sathish"

I request you not to delete the article about "Nivedhithaa Sathish" And I have added one reference.. Jamesroberttn (talk) 08:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

This is my vikipedia dear Cahk

Hello Dear Cahk

I am Sister Zeph from Pakistan an international award winning girls education activist, I have recently seen that someone wrote so bad about me on vikipedia it said I am a sex worker and all that , which is of course not true but since I am an education activist and a public figure so of course people hate me for teaching the girls in Pakistan.

Therefor i would request you to block that person who made changes on 2nd of October-2017, also change my name from Rifat Arif to sister Zeph and allow me to put accurate information along with all the articles and media publications about me and my work.

Looking forward to hear from you soon with Respect Sister Zeph

@Sister Zeph: First of all, I am not an administrator so I have no ability to "block" the IP address who vandalized the page. Secondly, even if you are the subject of the article as you claimed (see the autobiography notice I placed on your talk page), you do not "own" the article and as such, cannot dictate what goes on or be removed from the article, provided the information is cited accurately. Finally, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such, it is not an appropriate medium to "promote" yourself or the work you do.--Cahk (talk) 07:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Dear Cahk

Thank you very much for your feedback, May I know who is the administrator who can give a warning at least to such people who are putting lives in danger, I have hundreds of interviews, blogs and links about my work on social media, but still someone is describing me in such bad way and there is no one to stop him/ her, i am a girls education activist and if you put some one's information like that without any verification not only mine but the future and life of those girls can be in danger, I have already been attacked by gunmen, and this false information which was given here it is a cyber crime, I think as much hard time you are giving me if you would have given to that person who dared to do it, it would not happen , at least guide me how to delete this page, I should have a right to correct information which about me.

Do think that those parents will send their daughters to my school again who will see such language and words about me ? I am not trying to promoting myself , I am just trying to make my information correct

Looking forward to hear from you soon and a help to save my future and future of hundreds of my students by putting here correct information which can be googled easily With Respect Sister Zeph

You can consult with User:C.Fred with respect to the administrator tasks/matters.--Cahk (talk) 08:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

@Sister Zeph: It looks like the offending versions of the article have been selectively deleted ("revdeled"), so they should no longer be visible on Wikipedia. The vandalism came from anonymous editors at an IP; there's nothing we can do right now to sanction those users. I have added the page to my watchlist, so if there is any further vandalism, I can help clean it up (to the right version, this time!). Again, I apologize about the confusion with reverting your initial—and entirely appropriate under the circumstances—edits. —C.Fred (talk) 22:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Pertaining to the [Speedy deletion nomination of User:Brendamr sg ]

The page is created to disclose my position on the conflict of interest. I came across the Jimbo Wales user page whereby he provided information on who he is, hence we did the same. If the article is deemed to be of promotional purpose, we are happy to amend or remove information to comply with the Wikipedia guidelines.

Seems that we could not have a chance to amend the content since it was taken down so quickly. I will attempt to create another user page that will very simply state which organisation we are from. If that is insufficient or still deemed as of a promotional nature, we hope you can provide some advice on how we can disclose our conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendamr sg (talk • contribs) 09:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

@Brendamr sg: I can't say I remember exactly what was on your page, but it was considered to be promotional enough that it was deleted and you were given a level 4 warning by an administrator. Simply put, you can't use Wikipedia to promote a business.--Cahk (talk) 07:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

User page

Question what do I have to keep my page. The only links left explained sorces of injuries, and events that go with my life story, and bio. I removed them links at their bottom please help me out I'm disabled, and new to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comedian rob j (talk • contribs) 08:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

@Comedian rob j: Please see WP:NOTWEBHOST.--Cahk (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

So can we keep my general biography? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comedian rob j (talk • contribs) 08:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

@Comedian rob j: An administrator will decide that. As it stands, I doubt the page will be kept.--Cahk (talk) 08:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Cahk, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

• Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

• The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

deleted?

was my entry already deleted?

@RyanAronin: No. your draft is still here.--Cahk (talk) 08:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Helping Others

I'd like to nominate you in helping me, a newish member of this community, to fix the Romeo Lacoste Page situation.

I noticed the original attempt of a page had flagged for deletion but with errors that didn't quite make sense to me at first. After reading what they'd done wrong, I went about it myself to create a page for his particular figure. I did hours worth of research on him and found verified sources to create his page. The page you currently flagged for "speedy deletion" was not at all the same. I personally sat there drafted and cited that page myself. I made sure I followed wikis guidelines etc.

I appreciate your help. What can you do to assist me in getting the page created? TheEditor0624 (talk) 10:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

@TheEditor0624: I have not seen the original article so I can't say if your creation was an improvement or not. However, what I can say is that Wikipedia is not a source for other Wikipedia articles (I note you had a few "sources" that were simply redirecting back to an article). You will have to find additional sources that talks about the article subject, and demonstrate why he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Being a tattoo artist to celebrities is not a significant claim. You may have better luck with an administrator who can see deleted edits to tell you more. --Cahk (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WLU CoA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WLU CoA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

→

Archive 15