Jump to content

Set function

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, especially measure theory, a set function is a function whose domain is a family of subsets of some given set and that (usually) takes its values in the extended real number line which consists of the real numbers and

A set function generally aims to measure subsets in some way. Measures are typical examples of "measuring" set functions. Therefore, the term "set function" is often used for avoiding confusion between the mathematical meaning of "measure" and its common language meaning.

Definitions

[edit]

If is a family of sets over (meaning that where denotes the powerset) then a set function on is a function with domain and codomain or, sometimes, the codomain is instead some vector space, as with vector measures, complex measures, and projection-valued measures. The domain of a set function may have any number properties; the commonly encountered properties and categories of families are listed in the table below.

In general, it is typically assumed that is always well-defined for all or equivalently, that does not take on both and as values. This article will henceforth assume this; although alternatively, all definitions below could instead be qualified by statements such as "whenever the sum/series is defined". This is sometimes done with subtraction, such as with the following result, which holds whenever is finitely additive:

Set difference formula: is defined with satisfying and

Null sets

A set is called a null set (with respect to ) or simply null if Whenever is not identically equal to either or then it is typically also assumed that:

  • null empty set: if

Variation and mass

The total variation of a set is where denotes the absolute value (or more generally, it denotes the norm or seminorm if is vector-valued in a (semi)normed space). Assuming that then is called the total variation of and is called the mass of

A set function is called finite if for every the value is finite (which by definition means that and ; an infinite value is one that is equal to or ). Every finite set function must have a finite mass.

Common properties of set functions

[edit]

A set function on is said to be[1]

  • non-negative if it is valued in
  • finitely additive if for all pairwise disjoint finite sequences such that
    • If is closed under binary unions then is finitely additive if and only if for all disjoint pairs
    • If is finitely additive and if then taking shows that which is only possible if or where in the latter case, for every (so only the case is useful).
  • countably additive or σ-additive[2] if in addition to being finitely additive, for all pairwise disjoint sequences in such that all of the following hold:
      • The series on the left hand side is defined in the usual way as the limit
      • As a consequence, if is any permutation/bijection then this is because and applying this condition (a) twice guarantees that both and hold. By definition, a convergent series with this property is said to be unconditionally convergent. Stated in plain English, this means that rearranging/relabeling the sets to the new order does not affect the sum of their measures. This is desirable since just as the union does not depend on the order of these sets, the same should be true of the sums and
    1. if is not infinite then this series must also converge absolutely, which by definition means that must be finite. This is automatically true if is non-negative (or even just valued in the extended real numbers).
      • As with any convergent series of real numbers, by the Riemann series theorem, the series converges absolutely if and only if its sum does not depend on the order of its terms (a property known as unconditional convergence). Since unconditional convergence is guaranteed by (a) above, this condition is automatically true if is valued in
    2. if is infinite then it is also required that the value of at least one of the series be finite (so that the sum of their values is well-defined). This is automatically true if is non-negative.
  • a pre-measure if it is non-negative, countably additive (including finitely additive), and has a null empty set.
  • a measure if it is a pre-measure whose domain is a σ-algebra. That is to say, a measure is a non-negative countably additive set function on a σ-algebra that has a null empty set.
  • a probability measure if it is a measure that has a mass of
  • an outer measure if it is non-negative, countably subadditive, has a null empty set, and has the power set as its domain.
  • a signed measure if it is countably additive, has a null empty set, and does not take on both and as values.
  • complete if every subset of every null set is null; explicitly, this means: whenever and is any subset of then and
    • Unlike many other properties, completeness places requirements on the set (and not just on 's values).
  • 𝜎-finite if there exists a sequence in such that is finite for every index and also
  • decomposable if there exists a subfamily of pairwise disjoint sets such that is finite for every and also (where ).
    • Every 𝜎-finite set function is decomposable although not conversely. For example, the counting measure on (whose domain is ) is decomposable but not 𝜎-finite.
  • a vector measure if it is a countably additive set function valued in a topological vector space (such as a normed space) whose domain is a σ-algebra.
    • If is valued in a normed space then it is countably additive if and only if for any pairwise disjoint sequence in If is finitely additive and valued in a Banach space then it is countably additive if and only if for any pairwise disjoint sequence in
  • a complex measure if it is a countably additive complex-valued set function whose domain is a σ-algebra.
    • By definition, a complex measure never takes as a value and so has a null empty set.
  • a random measure if it is a measure-valued random element.

Arbitrary sums

As described in this article's section on generalized series, for any family of real numbers indexed by an arbitrary indexing set it is possible to define their sum as the limit of the net of finite partial sums where the domain is directed by Whenever this net converges then its limit is denoted by the symbols while if this net instead diverges to then this may be indicated by writing Any sum over the empty set is defined to be zero; that is, if then by definition.

For example, if for every then And it can be shown that If then the generalized series converges in if and only if converges unconditionally (or equivalently, converges absolutely) in the usual sense. If a generalized series converges in then both and also converge to elements of and the set is necessarily countable (that is, either finite or countably infinite); this remains true if is replaced with any normed space.[proof 1] It follows that in order for a generalized series to converge in or it is necessary that all but at most countably many will be equal to which means that is a sum of at most countably many non-zero terms. Said differently, if is uncountable then the generalized series does not converge.

In summary, due to the nature of the real numbers and its topology, every generalized series of real numbers (indexed by an arbitrary set) that converges can be reduced to an ordinary absolutely convergent series of countably many real numbers. So in the context of measure theory, there is little benefit gained by considering uncountably many sets and generalized series. In particular, this is why the definition of "countably additive" is rarely extended from countably many sets in (and the usual countable series ) to arbitrarily many sets (and the generalized series ).

Inner measures, outer measures, and other properties

[edit]

A set function is said to be/satisfies[1]

  • monotone if whenever satisfy
  • modular if it satisfies the following condition, known as modularity: for all such that
  • submodular if for all such that
  • finitely subadditive if for all finite sequences that satisfy
  • countably subadditive or σ-subadditive if for all sequences in that satisfy
    • If is closed under finite unions then this condition holds if and only if for all If is non-negative then the absolute values may be removed.
    • If is a measure then this condition holds if and only if for all in [3] If is a probability measure then this inequality is Boole's inequality.
    • If is countably subadditive and with then is finitely subadditive.
  • superadditive if whenever are disjoint with
  • continuous from above if for all non-increasing sequences of sets in such that with and all finite.
    • Lebesgue measure is continuous from above but it would not be if the assumption that all are eventually finite was omitted from the definition, as this example shows: For every integer let be the open interval so that where
  • continuous from below if for all non-decreasing sequences of sets in such that
  • infinity is approached from below if whenever satisfies then for every real there exists some such that and
  • an outer measure if is non-negative, countably subadditive, has a null empty set, and has the power set as its domain.
  • an inner measure if is non-negative, superadditive, continuous from above, has a null empty set, has the power set as its domain, and is approached from below.
  • atomic if every measurable set of positive measure contains an atom.

If a binary operation is defined, then a set function is said to be

  • translation invariant if for all and such that
[edit]

If is a topology on then a set function is said to be:

  • a Borel measure if it is a measure defined on the σ-algebra of all Borel sets, which is the smallest σ-algebra containing all open subsets (that is, containing ).
  • a Baire measure if it is a measure defined on the σ-algebra of all Baire sets.
  • locally finite if for every point there exists some neighborhood of this point such that is finite.
    • If is a finitely additive, monotone, and locally finite then is necessarily finite for every compact measurable subset
  • -additive if whenever is directed with respect to and satisfies
    • is directed with respect to if and only if it is not empty and for all there exists some such that and
  • inner regular or tight if for every
  • outer regular if for every
  • regular if it is both inner regular and outer regular.
  • a Borel regular measure if it is a Borel measure that is also regular.
  • a Radon measure if it is a regular and locally finite measure.
  • strictly positive if every non-empty open subset has (strictly) positive measure.
  • a valuation if it is non-negative, monotone, modular, has a null empty set, and has domain

Relationships between set functions

[edit]

If and are two set functions over then:

  • is said to be absolutely continuous with respect to or dominated by , written if for every set that belongs to the domain of both and if then
  • and are singular, written if there exist disjoint sets and in the domains of and such that for all in the domain of and for all in the domain of

Examples

[edit]

Examples of set functions include:

  • The function assigning densities to sufficiently well-behaved subsets is a set function.
  • A probability measure assigns a probability to each set in a σ-algebra. Specifically, the probability of the empty set is zero and the probability of the sample space is with other sets given probabilities between and
  • A possibility measure assigns a number between zero and one to each set in the powerset of some given set. See possibility theory.
  • A random set is a set-valued random variable. See the article random compact set.

The Jordan measure on is a set function defined on the set of all Jordan measurable subsets of it sends a Jordan measurable set to its Jordan measure.

Lebesgue measure

[edit]

The Lebesgue measure on is a set function that assigns a non-negative real number to every set of real numbers that belongs to the Lebesgue -algebra.[5]

Its definition begins with the set of all intervals of real numbers, which is a semialgebra on The function that assigns to every interval its is a finitely additive set function (explicitly, if has endpoints then ). This set function can be extended to the Lebesgue outer measure on which is the translation-invariant set function that sends a subset to the infimum Lebesgue outer measure is not countably additive (and so is not a measure) although its restriction to the 𝜎-algebra of all subsets that satisfy the Carathéodory criterion: is a measure that called Lebesgue measure. Vitali sets are examples of non-measurable sets of real numbers.

Infinite-dimensional space

[edit]

As detailed in the article on infinite-dimensional Lebesgue measure, the only locally finite and translation-invariant Borel measure on an infinite-dimensional separable normed space is the trivial measure. However, it is possible to define Gaussian measures on infinite-dimensional topological vector spaces. The structure theorem for Gaussian measures shows that the abstract Wiener space construction is essentially the only way to obtain a strictly positive Gaussian measure on a separable Banach space.

Finitely additive translation-invariant set functions

[edit]

The only translation-invariant measure on with domain that is finite on every compact subset of is the trivial set function that is identically equal to (that is, it sends every to )[6] However, if countable additivity is weakened to finite additivity then a non-trivial set function with these properties does exist and moreover, some are even valued in In fact, such non-trivial set functions will exist even if is replaced by any other abelian group [7]

Theorem[8] — If is any abelian group then there exists a finitely additive and translation-invariant[note 1] set function of mass

Extending set functions

[edit]

Extending from semialgebras to algebras

[edit]

Suppose that is a set function on a semialgebra over and let which is the algebra on generated by The archetypal example of a semialgebra that is not also an algebra is the family on where for all [9] Importantly, the two non-strict inequalities in cannot be replaced with strict inequalities since semialgebras must contain the whole underlying set that is, is a requirement of semialgebras (as is ).

If is finitely additive then it has a unique extension to a set function on defined by sending (where indicates that these are pairwise disjoint) to:[9] This extension will also be finitely additive: for any pairwise disjoint [9]

If in addition is extended real-valued and monotone (which, in particular, will be the case if is non-negative) then will be monotone and finitely subadditive: for any such that [9]

Extending from rings to σ-algebras

[edit]

If is a pre-measure on a ring of sets (such as an algebra of sets) over then has an extension to a measure on the σ-algebra generated by If is σ-finite then this extension is unique.

To define this extension, first extend to an outer measure on by and then restrict it to the set of -measurable sets (that is, Carathéodory-measurable sets), which is the set of all such that It is a -algebra and is sigma-additive on it, by Caratheodory lemma.

Restricting outer measures

[edit]

If is an outer measure on a set where (by definition) the domain is necessarily the power set of then a subset is called –measurable or Carathéodory-measurable if it satisfies the following Carathéodory's criterion: where is the complement of

The family of all –measurable subsets is a σ-algebra and the restriction of the outer measure to this family is a measure.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Durrett 2019, pp. 1–37, 455–470.
  2. ^ Durrett 2019, pp. 466–470.
  3. ^ Royden & Fitzpatrick 2010, p. 30.
  4. ^ Kallenberg, Olav (2017). Random Measures, Theory and Applications. Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling. Vol. 77. Switzerland: Springer. p. 21. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41598-7. ISBN 978-3-319-41596-3.
  5. ^ Kolmogorov and Fomin 1975
  6. ^ Rudin 1991, p. 139.
  7. ^ Rudin 1991, pp. 139–140.
  8. ^ Rudin 1991, pp. 141–142.
  9. ^ a b c d Durrett 2019, pp. 1–9.
  1. ^ The function being translation-invariant means that for every and every subset

Proofs

  1. ^ Suppose the net converges to some point in a metrizable topological vector space (such as or a normed space), where recall that this net's domain is the directed set Like every convergent net, this convergent net of partial sums is a Cauchy net, which for this particular net means (by definition) that for every neighborhood of the origin in there exists a finite subset of such that for all finite supersets this implies that for every (by taking and ). Since is metrizable, it has a countable neighborhood basis at the origin, whose intersection is necessarily (since is a Hausdorff TVS). For every positive integer pick a finite subset such that for every If belongs to then belongs to Thus for every index that does not belong to the countable set

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]