This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Apologies for not starting a discussion on this sooner – I thought the case for the merge was straightforward, and since no one objected, got on with merging; however there isn't (to my knowledge) a template indicating that a merge is in progress, so I left the usual ones be. My plan is to continue working my way through 10th century in poetry and adding the poets and poems I can find sources for to 10th century in literature, then work through 900s in poetry, 910s in poetry, etc. (which can be redirected to the literature article when their contents are duplicated). I think 10th century in literature has always included poets and their works, because literature necessarily includes poetry. In medieval literature especially, the lines are somewhat blurred – the most historically significant works of certain cultures' literature are often poetry, meaning that if the literature article were to miss, for example, Beowulf, it would give the reader a flawed sense of the literature of the period. If this article grows to the point where WP:SIZESPLIT applies (and I don't think it will), then I'd suggest splitting along geographical lines – 10th century in Japanese poetry, 10th century in Arabic literature, etc. – rather than along a false literature/poetry dichotomy. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
