Talk:David Paisley

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Two David Paisleys?

Shouldn't this be a disambig or something? I know nothing of either one, so I'm reluctant to do anything. -- SatyrTN (talk |contribs) 22:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the other one - are you not thinking of Ian Paisley DavidAnstiss (talk) 23:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on David Paisley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of material to the Personal Life section

A couple of users have amended the section on David Paisley's page to refer to an ongoing criminal case. As the person that has been charged is not David Paisley it would not be appropriate to add the material that was added anyway, but there is also the additional matter that it is unlawful under all jurisdictions of the UK to post material that may be prejudicial to an ongoing criminal matter as the material added this morning seems to be – SakuraNoSeirei (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given the source used for the changes on 04/06/21 came from Graham Linehan's Substack, and both individuals who posted the information have little previous history of wikipedia editing besides attacking transgender individuals/rights movements (one even recieving a temporary block for it), I would very strongly suspect that said changes were not made in good faith. 152.78.198.89 (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SakuraNoSeirei: Ye removed sources relating to the Cherry v Paisley case (1), was this intentional? It feels like a blanket blanking without checking and just want to check. Also going to ping @Autumnking2012: who removed the statement for being unsourced (2) CiphriusKane (talk) 21:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the content because it was unsourced when I looked at the page. I was unaware of the edit history. I have now re-added, with the source previously supplied, and reworded, to illustrate who Cherry is, and accurately reflect the source. I would be in agreement with SakuraNoSeirei that the content about the criminal case should not be here. No reliable source has at present confirmed he is the complainant, and a substack page is most definitely not a reliable source for Wikipedia. AutumnKing (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry about that. Hadn't spotted I'd removed the cite for the previous section when I took out the part about an on-going criminal matter – SakuraNoSeirei (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life section needs to be renamed

…as it’s not the typical personal life in content. It’s not quite campaigning either, tho he is described as such in the lede and has a name for it. Boscaswell talk 11:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]