Jump to content

Talk:Divya Bharti

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDivya Bharti has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 10, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
September 16, 2020Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 25, 2024.
Current status: Good article

The post you’re seeing does not indicate that Divya Bhrati is an actress or about her personal life. But, she is considered as a god and there is a crew who is there for her, for her vision and for her ambition, to fulfill the ambition she was unable to achieve.

The followers mentioned above are “nastic” and they are some kind of atheists and there is no consideration to the races and religions, and this approach is not forced or there is no organized structure for this attempt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.161.143 (talk) 09:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The post you’re seeing does not indicate that Divya Bhrati is an actress or about her personal life. But, she is considered as a god and there is a crew who is there for her, for her vision and for her ambition, to fulfill the ambition she was unable to achieve.

The followers mentioned above are “nastic” and they are some kind of atheists and there is no consideration to the races and religions, and this approach is not forced or there is no organized structure for this attempt.61.245.161.143 (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Idiot Rajav yadav

[edit]

Some idiot name rajav yadev deleting stuff adding his own name here on Wikipedia someone please fix Divya Bharti Wikipedia and block that idiot Saradutt (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About Divya Bharti,s status in hindi movies

[edit]

Someone deleated so many times few initial lines about Divya(Known for her acting versatility,vivacity and beauty she is regarded as one of the most popular and highest paid actresses of her time).Please read article about Divya hindustan times 05/04/20.So many other articles and people who watch movies and her age fellows know how popular she was in early 90s.She was most demanded girl by producers after Madhuri.When she died Sridevi and Juhi picked up her movies.Its unfair with her status and for her fans someone deleat above mentioned lines. I read wiki very often and sometimes do editing fairly according to my true knowledge but I M not IT person.Few people who r good in technology use wiki as what they want to write.If any sincere person from wikipedia help me out will be appreciated.I want to add above circled lines in Divya,s wiki....please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aligulla (talkcontribs) 07:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly do not revert before any consensus on talk page, firstly what you are insisting to add is puffery and this huge puffery needs strong news publication sources i.e if she was highest paid what was her net worth. Any news which is claiming that she earns xyz amount which makes her highest paid?. Wikipidea is more concern about sources and that too reliable. The source which you linked is some random facebook fan page of this person. Secondly as far as mentioned on article, the actress was active only three years then how came its possible she was popular and highest paid at that time. but still the concern is about references. 221.132.118.191 (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

I'll be improving the references section.--Esprit15d • talkcontribs 00:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent and thank you.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  07:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

To the reviewer, please be considerate while reviewing must provide good amount of time to fix issues. the article had been quick failed in the past. I have added good references, CE is completed. Still all kind of suggestions, ideas, and criticism is welcome. Thanks in advance.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  15:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article finally a GA. To editors, you all are free to make significant edits. Please avoid adding unnecessary information about her that require strong sources. It took great time and effort to take it to GA. Let's not ruin it. Happy editing.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 17:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]