This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Ely Cathedral is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Don't want to be rude or anything, but it's not really a very true likeness of the cathedral is it? Because it's stitched together the angles on the tower are really rather weirdly squashed - that lamp post is nearly at 45 degrees! Rob (talk) 10:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think the angle of the lamp post results not from the stitching software but from the actions of some local youngsters who overdid it in the Minster Tavern... Anyway, whatever its artistic merits, I would agree that the photo doesn't give a very accurate or helpful sense of the architecture so I'm not sure it would add anything to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by StuartLondon (talk • contribs) 11:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, there is something strangely compelling about the stitching on the photograph - it gives it a slightly abstract look that I can't quite grasp. I suppose it's because the angles on the individual photos were slightly different, but when stiched presents it as a whole that it doesn't resemble in reality - the perspective presented by the single photograph is not one permitted by the laws of geometry! Rob (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"The cathedral was soon refounded in 1541. Later, during the English Civil War, the lady chapel had many of its statues destroyed by Puritans under the control of Oliver Cromwell." What's the source for this? The leaflet I got from the cathedral yesterday seems to think that the serious vandalism occurred in 1541 ("in 1541, soon after the dissolution of the monastery, windows were smashed and sculptures removed or defaced.") I wonder which is right? --Ewx11:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I would imagine that the leaflet is correct, in which case I'll change the entry. It's perfectly acceptable to make changes yourself, though, if you know they're wrong. Bob18:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The truth is nobody knows because there is no firm archival evidence either way. Different authorities ascribe the blame to the reformation iconoclasts or to the Puritans according to their particular political views. Leaflets handed out in churches and cathedrals are often quite unreliable, based on local legends and hearsay rather than serious academic evidence. The excellent Bell's Guide (W.D. Sweeting, published 1901 but still well respected) says; It is always taken for granted that the destruction of the beautiful work in the lady-chapel, as well as of the shrines and statuary in the cathedral, was effected very soon after the dissolution of the monastery; but precise authority for this seems not to be forthcoming. It is known that Bishop Goodrich was an ardent supporter of the Reformation movement, and that he issued an injunction in 1541 which would have authorised such destruction. There was no other material damage done to the cathedral at this time. In 1566 a parish church, dedicated to S. Cross, which was situated at the north side of the nave, was found to be so dilapidated that no attempt was made to render it fit for service, and the dean and chapter gave to the parishioners the lady-chapel for a parish church, and it has so remained to this day. It is probable that the wealth of the monastery had kept the fabric itself in such a state of complete repair that there was no occasion for much sustentation work for a long time after the Reformation—at least, we read nothing of any work being undertaken or of any portions of the building falling into decay. In the Commonwealth period the cathedral suffered less than in many places. The stained glass was indeed destroyed, and the cloisters and some parts of the domestic buildings pulled down, by order of commissioners. As Oliver Cromwell was Governor of the Isle of Ely, and often in the city, he was not likely to let the cathedral services alone. In January, 1644, he interfered during service, and stopped it, ejecting the congregation, and is said to have professed that this was an act of kindness, in order to prevent damage to the building. According to Carlyle, he had written to the officiating minister, requiring him "to forbear altogether the choir service, so unedifying and offensive, lest the soldiers should in any tumultuary or disorderly way attempt the reformation of the cathedral church." If the people of Ely had heard about the "reformation" of the cathedral church at Peterborough, as carried out by the soldiers of the Parliament in July of the preceding year, they were certainly well advised in taking this hint. Bishop Wren—an eager opponent of the Puritans—was at the time in prison, where he remained until the Restoration (page 29). Hope that helps. StuartLondon (talk) 09:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest moving the two lists of abbots and abbesses as they do not add much interest to the article. Perhaps incorporate them into the Bishops of Ely article? --Stefan18:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As the CofE is an established church (Ely is not a Catholic cathedral by the way) they are more than just church titles. He and I had a discussion about which people should be listed, possibly more on his talk page than here (or possibly even just in earlier edit summaries for the page), I can't remember if the styles themselves were actually discussed, but I'm not sure what precisely your objection to them is, they are in common use in England. In addition, it is possible in the CofE to have lay canons, and someone who has been ordained a bishop (usually someone who has been a suffragan i.e. assistant bishop) can then be appointed as the Dean of a cathedral so the titles give a certain amount of useful additional information about people who are not necessarily notable enough to have their own Wikipedia articles. Those entitled to style themselves "Dr" have probably gained the title from a normal secular university (unless any of them are Lambeth degrees), so those are not purely "church titles" in any case. Your edit summary ws perhaps slightly misleading, in that it only mentioned the removal of the titles, rather than the image and other changes, which are comparitively easy to overlook, even in a diff. David Underdown14:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can I just confirm back to the article with respect to an edit I made the other day, that the post of Vice Dean is Currently Vacant within Ely Cathedral, owing to the retirement of the former Vice Dean, Revd. Canon. Dr. Peter Sills. The Precentor, Canon David Pritchard, is currently filling this role, as Acting Vice Dean only. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does it seem like a lot of windows have been bricked up? Why doesn't the article mention anything? And in the featured photo, it looks like there was more building to the left but it was destroyed/removed, leaving a semi-jagged wall. --98.232.182.66 (talk) 10:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They're purely decoratice niches, I think rather than bricked up windows, possibly they might have had statues associate diwth them at some point, I don't know. The collapse is mentioned "The north-west transept collapsed in the 15th century and was never rebuilt, leaving a scar on the outside of that corner that can still be seen." David Underdown (talk) 10:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They may also be old doors going through the building, since it started life as a monastery, if my memory serves me correctly. They are seen on the ground floor as well at the first and second levels. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Causing the usual problem of a gap in the text, but only on wide monitors, this time. See also Chichester, Bristol, Canterbury etc. Please LOKK before saving any pic or box! Amandajm (talk) 07:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Much of the material in this article is unsourced. Per the Wikipedia verifiability policy, material that is not supported with citations to reliable sources may be removed. For the avoidance of doubt, the further reading section is not a replacement for citations to reliable sources. If you wish to use one or more sources from the further reading section as references in the body of the article, remove each source in the further reading section as you cite it in the body. To help trigger proper referencing in this article, I have removed part of the unsourced material and placed it here:
Choirs
Ely has a cathedral choir of boys and men, which has recently attracted international attention because of its association with The Choirboys: two of its members, Patrick Aspbury and CJ Porter-Thaw, are choristers at the cathedral. Boys are educated in the junior department of The King's School, Ely.[citation needed]
The Ely Cathedral Girls' Choir was also launched in 2006, comprising 18 girl choristers who are pupils at The King's School.[citation needed]The choir's debut CD, Sing reign of fair maid: Music for Christmas and the New Year, directed by Sarah MacDonald, is available from Regent Records.
The cathedral community also has an adult voluntary choir, The Ely Cathedral Octagon Singers and a children's choir The Ely Imps. in 1994 the two division bell pink floyd statues were placed and the mouth of the two statues leads to the Ely Cathedral[citation needed]
There appears to be some dispute over the which image to use in the Infobox. It needs to be decided whether an image that portrays the entire building is used, or one which merely shows the west tower.
An image depicting the entire building gives a good overview. But, a view of the west tower is more representative of how the Cathedral is generally seen from the ground.
I think the image of the west tower is stronger, is more distinctive and accords more with the view of most visitors. For these reasons I think it would be a better image for the info box. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
An alternative is a view from afar. There is not one in commons that is exactly what I have in mind, but the file
Ely-071
is nearest. In fact too near (spacially). A view from further afield, showing the building in its wider Fen context would be better. Both the west tower and lantern deserve inclusion.SovalValtos (talk) 12:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The current aerial image is of insufficient quality to be used other than in a gallery ,even at max size, so I will trial some changes soon. SovalValtos (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have now cropped the image and reloaded it. I hope I have done everything correctly. Here it is to compare
Ely Cathedral Cropped version of the original file
The image from the fens is now in the info box, but I cannot work out how to put the view of the towers in History. The aerial view might better be in Today SovalValtos (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The one you (Heuschrecke) have just added is better lit than the previous one and benefits from the trees not being in leaf, but the angle is not as good with the foreground brick buildings. I would like to see a winter image (no leaves) taken from the hill near Stuntney (52.376 0.281) preferably with early morning light and the low ground covered with mist! I am based over a hundred miles away and might travel myself, but a local to do a recce would be welcome. Probably a 300mm telephoto needed. SovalValtos (talk) 10:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The image Heuschrecke added was not centered, and it only contains a partial view of the Cathedral. While a view from Stuntney in early morning light is surely beautiful, I doubt that it is the most representative view of Ely Cathedral. This is an informational article, visibility and detail should come first. I am switching back to the aerial view because it show the entire building. We certainly don't need an aerial view, and a view from afar. If someone can get another full image of the Cathedral without shrouding it in trees then this would be excellent. Otherwise, I don't think any other image demonstrates the architecture of the building better than the aerial view. Please note that in the aerial view, you can see the Lady Chapel, which is hidden in the other images, and you can see the entire side of the building, which is also hidden it the other images.Innocenceisdeath (talk) 10:15, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Guidelines rather discourage random galleries simple. I have started grouping images in the gallery with the intention of creating a more logical progression to make it easier to see what is included. The existing gallery might be sub divided in future to illustrate other sections. I have been pointed at the Wells Cathedral page for good use of galleries. There may be useful images to add to this one, and perhaps some to remove. My next intention is to go through Commons to see what might be gleaned. The Lady Chapel so far is poorly served.SovalValtos (talk) 19:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Help with this superb subject would be appreciated. Images could be a useful integral part of the article. The ground plan is already vital.SovalValtos (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Might it be better for the religious community section to be moved down below buildings? The article is Ely Cathedral, whose structures have housed different communities. The size and wording of the headings under buildings might be improved. Two lots of later; the second perhaps to be changed to post reformation? SovalValtos (talk) 22:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone know the meaning of these? The first to appear seems to be "King Henry III and other dignitaries.[13]" in Gothic elements/Early, and then they run right through the article to "surmounted by the 1690s organ case.[25]" in Later history of the building. They don't coincide with the references so I assume a previous edit has removed some footnotes or something, but I can't find that edit. Emerald (talk) 12:54, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good point - and having tracked down User talk:David Stazicker I see you got there ahead of me. Unfortunately, it looks as if these Ely contributions in may 2014 are his sole attempt at wikipedia, so 9 months on it may not get much reaction. The end result is a really impressive (and at first reading well researched) text, which would take some serious work and good source material to write from scratch. My guess would be that he must have developed the entries in a sandbox, and was cutting and pasting from the preview page instead of the source code, so it has no wikilinks (which would be easyish to reinstate) and only the ref numbers survived if it did have proper citations, which is going to be more of a challenge to come up with. I have got several useful books to hand including Philip Lindley's Gothic to Renaissance (with a chapter on the Octagon), and from rather longer ago, R.J.King's 1862 Handbook to the Eastern Cathedrals. I am hoping to borrow Meadows and Ramsey, 2003, next week, which I assume has the state of knowledge on the phases of construction etc, so would be happy to start checking and referencing some of the details. Are there any other key texts which would be expected to be referenced? RobinLeicester (talk) 23:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whilst aiming to retain much of the very good material on this page, I can't escape the idea that as well as sorting out the citations, there needs to be a better structure. I am thinking that instead of the current time-based headings, the sections could relate better to the features within the cathedral. They could still be ordered with a broad chronology, but with headings such as 'Norman Abbey Church' [covering transepts and nave], 'Galilee porch', 'West tower', 'Octagon', 'Lady Chapel', 'Choir', 'Medieval sculpture', 'Dissolution and iconoclasm', 'Memorials', 'Nineteenth century additions'. Once I have got to grips with the material, I will see if I can start to migrate the material to both describe the features, and their place in the narrative of the building and the institution. (With the risk of stretching an analogy too far, the Octagon, as the element most notably singled out in general medieval architecture texts, needs to have as central a place in the text as it does in the cathedral.) At some point the lead paragraph will need to better reflect the whole page. By wikipedia standards I work quite slowly, so bear with me unless you think it is going very astray. RobinLeicester (talk) 00:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you that the article contains some good material, but could do with some reorganization. So I shall be interested to see how you modify it. I understand your request for patience, because I rarely have the courage to embark on such a task and take a long time when I do. LynwoodF (talk) 10:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
RobinLeicester I think your explanation for the square brackets is spot-on, and I probably won't hear back from their originator. The contributions were very good, so I am concerned that someone (justifiably) removes them for lack of verification. If you can fill in some of the gaps using the references you have to hand, that would be great. I live about 10 mins from the cathedral, so later on I will pop over there, there is probably a volunteer with encyclopedic knowledge and a shelf of references who can help me to back up the facts your references can't hold up. Let me know when you have done as much as you can. I also agree with your points about the structure. I originally went to the article because I was interested to know about the 'disappeared' north-west tower, it took ages to find and I was disappointed by the lack of information when I did find it! Emerald (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In a recent edit the expression "very ornate Decorated style" has been changed to "very ornately decorated style". I think the original wording is exactly what was intended. Any comments? LynwoodF (talk) 10:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No need to apologize. You have made an appropriate change, using "Decorated" in its technical sense. Thank you for your edit. LynwoodF (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I can quite see the point of date order and will revert if others agree that date is better than alphabet. Not all the entries here have a date or confirmation of Ely Cathedral burial. The linked articles generally have a source which could be used on this page.SovalValtos (talk) 11:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it can be difficult to know what to do where the amount of information varies between entries. Thank you for giving thought this. LynwoodF (talk) 12:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ely Cathedral is not known as the Ship of the Fens just because of its prominent position on the landscape; it got the name because from pretty much anywhere on the horizon, it looks like an old 2 funneled steam liner. Would this be counted as trivia to the article, or could it be used of correctly sourced? CharlieTheCabbie|paġna utenti|diskussjoni00:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the line 'Its status changed to that of a priory, with the bishop as titular abbot.' Given the logic of Benedictine monasticism, all priories are subject to an abbey. The fact that the monastery is headed in practice by a prior doesn't mean that it's not still an abbey; after all it still has an abbot - it's just that he's bishop! The way to determine this would be to discover how what the institution was called during its period as cathedral and monastery.However that's a task that's beyond my knowledge to perform Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 16:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Having got at least to a point with the architecture re-write, I have finally got round to re-doing what was a rather thin lead paragraph. I am sure neither the lead nor the article as a whole are 'finished' in any real sense, but I would urge not to introduce new information into the lead that is not expanded on elsewhere. (OK I know I just have - but maybe someone can sort out a more informed analysis of visitor and worship life of the cathedral - preferably from the viewpoint of notability rather than marketing-speak). RobinLeicester (talk) 23:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The British denigration of Sir George Gilbert Scott's restorations at Ely Cathedral as "Carpenter's Gothic" are discussed in Phillip Lindley, "'Carpenter's Gothic' and Gothic Carpentry: Contrasting Attitudes to the Restoration of the Octagon and Removals of the Choir at Ely Cathedral" "Architectural History" "30" (1987:83-112).
I hesitate to add it here, but this suggests that GGS's restoration was not as universally well-received as the article now suggests. Snori (talk) 05:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The ceiling and lantern of Ely Cathedral, an Anglican church in Cambridgeshire, England. First built in 1083, it is the seat of the Bishop of Ely and a suffragan bishop, the Bishop of Huntingdon. The central octagon, described by Nikolaus Pevsner as Ely's "greatest individual achievement of architectural genius", was built in the 14th century following the collapse of the Norman central crossing tower. The central lantern, which is also octagonal in form, has panels which can be opened to allow access from the octagon roof-space.Photograph: David Iliff
The list of canons is out of date now - actually there are two, one in the box at the top right and one in the body of the article, and they are mutually inconsistent.
Alan Hargrave retired in 2016 (special retirement service in January). Victoria Johnson and Jessica Martin need to be included. They were appointed following the retirements of David Pritchard and Alan Hargrave respectively.
The list of residentiary canons on the cathedral's own website includes Victoria and Jessica (and does not include David or Alan). I can find some appointment announcements easily enough. 146.90.14.156 (talk) 11:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Its most notable feature is the central octagonal tower, with lantern above".
I realise there has been considerable debate on which external images to use, but it strikes me that none of them show the east (or central) tower and lantern, which according to the lead paragraph, is Ely's "most notable feature". Not sure where it would fit, but there is currently a void below the subsection header "Octogon". Any suggestions? Alansplodge (talk) 16:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed the Octagon should feature but if for the infobox as lead image it should show the context of the Cathedral being "the ship of the Fens" to draw the reader in. I have planned to take such a photo for several years without fruit, one reason being the hours of travelling involved each time both for reconnaissance and precise lighting and weather requirements. I am happy to share my thoughts that it would need to be taken with early morning light and with the sea that the ship is on being provided by ground mist. The area of Stuntney is the likely camera point; a telephoto lens being required but not an extreme one my calculations showed.
Turner had quite a good eye though perhaps not to the taste of Wynne's virgin admirers. Joseph Mallord William Turner - View of Ely Cathedral - Google Art Project
If the point of the post Alansplodge is to chose an image the one you show has its drawbacks. IMHO it is cropped too close, has a distracting background and could be better lit. On the other hand the placement is simple; it should be in the Octagon section.Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 19:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ely Cathedral from Cambridge
@SovalValtos: It's not easy to take a side-on view of the cathedral, which is probably why there are no free images available. I have photographed it with my pocket compact from the nearest hill in a direct line from the south elevation, a golf course 17 miles away in Cambridge. I've included this on the right purely for information - I don't know whether it would be possible to take a usable image from this location with a decent lens on a clear day? Nearer locations such as Stuntney etc might be more viable, even though at an oblique angle - but I do think the view from Cambridge demonstrates the "ship of the fens" concept more starkly.----Pontificalibus06:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes from Wandlebury that's right. My shot is already zoomed in, and included some foreground and the farmhouse just to help people locate the cathedral with the naked eye. It's hard to see when standing there so I tell people to look up from the gable end of the farm house. I don't have sufficient knowledge to know what a decent shot from that location would look like but it would surely be interesting.----Pontificalibus11:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This file, File:26-Ely-071.jpg, is perhaps the closest at the moment to the 'whole aspect' you're looking for, although not sure the colours are quite right - the contrast is quite high. Bobtalk09:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
After edit conflict. Two valuable contributions User:Pontificalibus and Bob. The one with the barges I had already rejected, though re-reading the 'Infobox Image' section above I see that I had hopefully "improved" it from its original state. There have been several camera spots that I had identified. Somewhere on Queens Quanea Drove near 52.388 0.289 looks promising to include ground mist as the sea. Google Earth street view gives an idea both for this and other possibles but I cannot seem to link, and must not copyvio by uploading. I prefer a quarter view with the W tower and Octagon separated by sky rather than slab side on. Suitable lighting makes it more interesting. Even if not used in the article it would be would be good to have in commons. Is there anyone local who could have a go?SovalValtos (talk) 10:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The twitter contact, a good lead User:Pontificalibus, would likely need months for the right conditions even if interested. I hope they are and already contribute or will do. I am expecting here a picture worthy of featured status in itself. The subject deserves it.
Some slow sums have shown that pics from Queens Grove Quanea Grove or Stuntney have confirmed that a 35mm full frame lens of 300 or 400mm would suffice for the image I have in mind (details on request). Wandlebury might be used in the same way with the most expensive kit, but I think better used, for an another further 'draw in' pic. Such clear visibility as would be required from Wandlebury is rare but does exist in combination with the atmospheric ground mist.SovalValtos (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another possible vantage point is the walkway of the new Ely Southern Bypass, which crosses the railway and the river on a viaduct. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant Verbcatcher; real progress. I prefer the composition from Quanea Drove, if nothing else it shows the Lady chapel, good separation of architectural elements and there is less foreground clutter. File:Ely Cathedral from Quanea Drove C.jpg is already better than anything in the article for the infobox. With trepidation further improvements could include cropping down from the top left corner at the same picture ratio to exclude the brightly lit house gable end on the left and reduce sky but maintain foreground. It would be worth trying a series of slightly later times but this may already be the best. A fluffy cloud or two? higher vantage point? a yokel reed cutting with haywain rather than car? nearer to Quanea hill? and of course the ground mist, and then Feature pic here we come.SovalValtos (talk) 13:57, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SovalValtos: thank you for our kind remarks. I'll try cropping as you suggest; presumably you feel that File:Ely Cathedral from Quanea Drove B.jpg is too tightly framed. Fluffy clouds and ground mist could be Photoshopped but would probably look fake, otherwise I'll have to watch the weather. I chose the early morning for the sun direction, but an hour or so later would be ok. There are not many higher vantage points nearby. My camera's GPS indicated 2.4 m ASL, Quanea Hill is 6 m and Thorney Hill is 12 m. Morever, the trees on these hills might get in the way and the greater distance would cause more haze. Going nearer to Quanea Hill would cause the Lady Chapel Window to be more obscured and the pyramidal roof of Ely Maltings (central middleground) to be less obscured. I have other photos with this framing without the car, but this one was the sharpest. Yokels and haywains would be more difficult, but is that a WWII pillbox? Verbcatcher (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:PontificalibusVerbcatcher Although the title of this talk page section is 'External view showing the lantern' we have moved on to discussing the lead picture to be included at the top or in the infobox. I see Andrew Sharpe has added a decent external pic of the octagon so that resolved for now. Yes, Ely Cathedral from Quanea Drove B, too tightly framed with too much sky and too little fen foreground. As little fake photoshop as possible for my taste though I personally can't resist cropping. Original file uploading preferred if acceptable to the photo artist. Boosting of lurid colours and adding non existant fluffy's etc can be anathema; myself included. Hard work and time spent finding the camera spot worthwhile. Even a few feet could be important for finials/pinacle alignment. The higher vantage point I had in mind was at the same spot but with a ladder, or on top of a car or a bus! Whether higher would be better is difficult to imagine but it might move some obscuring away. The sun direction could be a matter of minutes rather than an hour. The Met Office forecast includes visibility [3] so waiting for the rare excellent conditions worthwhile rather than faking haze reduction. Leaf off tree could be helpful though I think the one over the Lady chapel might be Yew (not checked). Pruning saws not permitted. We are getting to the point where we have a fine image for the top. Are there further comments before this being used from other editors? A week or so should be allowed before a change is made.SovalValtos (talk) 10:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a new set of photos. I uploaded uncropped versions first and then replaced them with crops, so the cropping could be changed by other editors. One of these may be suitable for the infobox:
What a treat. Seldom does an editor take such care. No leg work involved for me this time! Thank you for posting the originals as well as your cropped versions. I have only looked at the crops so far. My immediate reaction is that 'F' and 'I' have the better camera angle in that the east window of the Lady chapel is less obscured and the pinnacles of the south transept are better placed along the roof-line of the nave. I suspect the late morning lighting will prove more popular but I tend towards the 0816hr version as being more interesting. I will comment further when I have played with your originals. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 17:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Verbcatcher having looked further at your latest three 'F' is still my winner as you have cropped it. There are possible refinements of camera angle that could be tried such as moving forward into the fields to open out the obscuring trees, or a higher vantage at the same spot. You mentioned above 'one was the sharpest' are you using a tripod without vibration reduction or handheld with? A tripod without, might help. I think subtle sharpening of your pics might also help. With a view towards featured pic status. User: Richard Nevell may be able to help us by contacting photo graders to have a look. I am keen to see 'F' used in the infobox, but as there have been differing opinions in the past should all those who have expressed opinions be pinged, or is relying on the page being watched sufficient? Pinging all contributors is not something I know how to do quickly. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 03:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Moving forward into the fields could be awkward. The immediate barrier is a substantial drainage channel, and there is a crop growing, probably potatoes. The trees obscuring parts of the cathedral are in Cherry Hill Park close the the cathedral, so moving into the fields will make little difference. File:Ely Cathedral from Middle Fen Bank D.jpg is from the same azimuth angle at about 60% of the distance, and slightly higher as Middle Fen Bank is about 2.5 m tall. Google Street View confirms that a slightly higher camera position on Quanea Drove would make little difference.[4] I plan to try again in the winter when many of the trees will be bare.
I was using a sturdy tripod with image stabilisation disabled. The camera was set to live view (mirror locked up) with a 2 second shutter delay to reduce vibration. Some heat shimmer is visible despite the early hour, this is more evident in File:Ely Cathedral from Quanea Drove H.jpg which was taken from a greater distance and a little later.
I used Canon's DPP software to process the raw camera file. I set DPP to improve the contrast by adjusting the gamma curve, and increased the sharpening setting from the default 3 to 8 (the maximum is 10). I have since investigated unsharp masking controls; setting these to maximum gives an artificial effect but I may be able to make a more subtle improvement. This would be unlikely to make a significant effect at the size of an Infobox image. I am a beginner with DPP and would welcome any expert advice. Any adjustments are probably better made by reprocessing the raw file, not by editing the JPEG file.
We should assume that any interested editors are watching this page, and that this discussion has continued long enough for them to be aware of it; pinging them should be unnecessary.
Verbcatcher you have not stated your own preference. Either 'F' or 'I' I would support and go ahead by replacing the west front view in the infobox. I think you already know more than me about processing. User: Richard Nevell is a busy person so I have looked further finding Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nomination procedure. User:Armbrust is a regular FPC editor/grader who might be able to advise which of 'F' or 'I' he prefers or any problems; they may both be FP quality of course. I don't think being on a talk page will fulfill the requirement of page use yet to be graded FP.SovalValtos (talk) 08:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer 'F' as the building is clearer. I have uploaded a revised version that I reprocessed with slightly different parameters, and I plan replace the infobox image with it. Should we use the old infobox image elsewhere in the article, possibly replacing the picture that shows the Galilee porch? Verbcatcher (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To me 'I' is more animated and has a more interesting sky. 'F' ts also very good, although for some reason the detailed foreground flora catches my eye! But nice work all round, Verbcatcher. Well done. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes File:Ely Cathedral Exterior, Cambridgeshire, UK - Diliff.jpg should replace File:Ely Cathedral West Front - geograph.org.uk - 178782.jpg as it has better perspective and resolution.SovalValtos (talk) 18:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ely Cathedral is an Anglican cathedral in the city of Ely in Cambridgeshire, England. The cathedral can trace its origin to an abbey founded in Ely in 672 by St Æthelthryth (also called Etheldreda). The earliest parts of the present building date to 1083, and it was granted cathedral status in 1109. Until the Reformation the cathedral was dedicated to St Etheldreda and St Peter, at which point it was refounded as the Cathedral Church of the Holy and Undivided Trinity of Ely. It is the cathedral of the Diocese of Ely and seat of the Bishop of Ely. Ely Cathedral was built in a monumental Romanesque style, with the galilee porch, lady chapel and choir later rebuilt in an exuberant Decorated Gothic. Its central octagonal tower and the West Tower give it a prominent position above the surrounding flat landscape. This photograph shows the cathedral's lady chapel.
Ely Cathedral from Quanea Drove E.jpg
File:Ely Cathedral from Quanea Drove F.jpg
File:Ely Cathedral from Quanea Drove I.jpg
