Talk:Google Chat

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Google Chat. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Google Chat at the Reference desk.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/10/08/google-chat-now-has-read-receipts-to-the-joy-of-some-and-the-dismay-of-others/

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

SBCornelius (talk · contribs) has been paid by Outspoken Media, on behalf of Google. COI declared: Also see User:SBCornelius

outdated info in Spaces section

> ¨Spaces is expected to gain increased functionality when Google Currents is shut down sometime in 2023 and user content is moved to Spaces.¨

Spaces has been shut down since March. Nn88nn88 (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean Currents has been shut down since March. I've tagged the statement with {{update inline}}. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nn88nn88,

I have updated part of the article and am actively working on updating other sections when new information is released about the Google Chat update.

Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 01:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nesecito ayuda con fotos borradas accidentalmente

buenas tardes 2601:140:9281:BB00:6817:6C97:10C9:C2F6 (talk) 22:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pls delete green screen on YouTube

pls ban green screen on youtube 103.13.133.234 (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I would love to help you, but I do not understand your request. Could you please repeat that? Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 17:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Off-topic conduct dispute

WARNING about unconstructive and antagonizing editor ItsCheck: ItsCheck has a track record of trolling, blindly reverting, making mistakes without learning from them, biting newcomers, making false allegations, and in general being a nuisance to Wikipedia. Then when people tell him his behavior drastically needs improvement, he feels "personally attacked" by that. Funny enough he wants to become rollback when he's clearly unfit for it. Here are witnesses to prove that: 1 2 3 Additionally, he falsely reverted edits multiple times on a BIOGRAPHY, to the point they had to be hidden. He may've been nice to you IP103, but I just want to let you know the hidden menace behind him. And ItsCheck, I'm saying this once more, you need to change your behavior. 35.141.142.199 (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? These allegations are from the past, and my recent edits have been constructive without any errors. Please refrain from making unnecessary personal attacks, as I was a only trying to assist this user with their request. ItsCheck (talk) 23:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ItsCheck: "My recent edits have been constructive" Nobody cares. Your bad edits are part of your permanent contributions record. People can and will judge you by it. Treat your contributions record like your criminal record.

"Unnecessary personal attacks" People criticizing your edit history is NOT "personal attacks", and that just proves my point that you are too sensitive and need to grow up.

Oh yeah I forgot to add to my previous message, you called our attempt of dispute resolution an "unwanted conversation". Firefangledfeathers and I agreed that it was quite rude of you.35.141.142.199 (talk) 00:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was clearing my talk page and no longer wanted that conversation there. That is all that I meant. Please do not take that edit summary out of context. ItsCheck (talk) 00:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well you should've made it clear from the very beginning, because the edit summary you initially provided made 2 people in this case (me and Fire) see a bad picture of you. 35.141.142.199 (talk) 00:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is blatantly false. The user mentioned above did not comment on your claim that this was offensive. Also, I have went through your edit history and seriously advise you not to personally attack other editors. This just makes them feel like you are a threat and makes them less likely to cooperate and defend themselves more. Refer to this help article for more information. In addition, the fact that you are repeatately insulting me could get you into a lot of trouble here on Wikipedia. Please stop the hateful tone and focus on conveying your information in a more helpful manner so we can reach a consensus. I will not hesitate to resort to adminstrator intervention if this behavior continues. ItsCheck (talk) 00:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The user mentioned above...offensive" He did. Also give me some examples where I "personally attacked" other editors. 35.141.142.199 (talk) 01:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]