Talk:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Speedy deletion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Resolved

– Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal redirected by Primefac.

Assuming good faith that the author has created this page on accident, since they are also in the process of submitting their draft, Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal, through the AfC process. Thus, this page will need to be deleted so that the AfC draft can be moved, if/when it is approved.

Of relevance is that the most recent declining of their draft occurred on April 20th, and this article was created on April 24th.―Biochemistry🙴❤ 06:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GB fan, since you performed the revert, can you explain your rationale in greater detail here? You noted in your revert that there were "no significant contributors [sic] to the draft prior to the article being copied and pasted here." However, the entire text of the draft was copy and pasted; is that not a "significant contribution" relative to the article? Or are you just saying that because the draft text was so short (only a paragraph), it doesn't matter if someone copy-pastes out of the AfC process and loses the page history? It was my understanding that copy-pasting was copy-pasting. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 15:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biochemistry&Love my edit summary does not say what I was thinking when I wrote it. It should have said "Decline speedy delete, no significant contributors other than the creator to the draft prior to the article being copied and pasted here." What I am saying is that when this was created at 12:42, 24 April 2017‎ there were no significant contributions by anyone other than Jeromeenriquez.There were edits by three contributors but none of them were content contributions. They were all edits to the AFC template. If we were to do a history merge from the Draft to here the only edits that should be merged are those prior to 12:42, 24 April 2017‎. The history on the Draft would be very odd if we were to pull those edits out of it. The page history only matters if we need to maintain attribution for content in the article, so all cut and paste moves are not equal. In this case all the content is attributed to the correct editor so there is no reason to do a history merge. If other editors had worked on the content prior to the cut and paste move, then we would need to do the history merge. If you have any questions let me know. ~ GB fan 16:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GB fan: Ah, that makes sense! "All cut and paste moves are not equal," I'm stealing that quote. I appreciate the explanation. What should be done about the AfC draft, then? ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 16:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biochemistry&Love I can think of two different things that we can do with it. One, nothing, let it sit for 6 months and it can be deleted G13. Two, redirect it to this article so that if anyone finds it they will come here to improve this rather than the draft. Both have advantages and disadvantages. I would lean more towards the redirect so we don't get someone working on the draft. ~ GB fan 17:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.