Talk:John Carpenter (bishop of Worcester)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Catholicism Low‑importance

John Carpenter (bishop of Worcester) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Article

I brought forward information from genealogical and other sources to try to enlarge the stub.

John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can this article receive a better rating? What needs to be done? I like the format. Enfermero (talk) 07:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisim warning

Iwanafish aka 160.244.140.202 This is a warning for your continuing disruptive edits and deliberate vandalisim.
Caution: do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you have done with Rehoboth Carpenter family,Culham and now John Carpenter (bishop).

You refuse to discuss, talk or converse. Your actions indicate you are deliberately causing harm to these articles for no apparent reason. It is childish, unprofessional and wrong. You need to stop.

John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article

This article is supposed to be about a bishop. Not about coats of arms issued in 1719, or large swatches of quoted text about a tomb. We don't use quotations without attribution, and there are apparantly some sections inside quotation marks that don't have citations. The article is very disjointed and reads like a genealogical entry, not an encyclopedia. We can't cite emails, they aren't reliable sources. Family genealogy CDs aren't either. It needs some major cleanup to meet encyclopedic standards. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty rare for a family to give the same name to two siblings, and usually only when one of them has died before the birth of the other. The "ancestry" section claimed that this Carpenter family had two consecutive generations in which two co-existant brothers were given the name John, these being John the elder elder, father of John the elder, John the younger elder, brother of John the elder elder, and John the younger younger, brother of John the elder. John the ancient was John the elder elder's grandfather, and Richard the milkman was his father. Ning-ning (talk) 08:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it was pretty common. This line came from France and Jean and Jehan both became John is English. One was a diminitive version. Yes, it can cause confusion, but only to those who are unaware of the genealogy. I plead guilty since to my focus on genealogy.

I was working on getting the author of the pictures of the tomb and Church to place the pictures in Wiki-Commons. So pending I linked via hyperlinks. Cites within a paragraph or section that had one source used one reference thus giving the view that some might not have been cited properly. No doubt first efforts needed triming. While I might not agree with all, your efforts with discussion is appreciated.

Any thought of what to do with Iwanafish who keeps vandalizing this and other articles without discussion. See his user page and Rehoboth Carpenter family discussion for efforts to try to get cooperation and discussion.

John R. Carpenter

Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The first point, about brothers sharing the same name and both being alive at the same time, I'll ask an expert... In an extensive genealogy of several English and American families that I'm helping get published, containing several thousand individuals back to the 17th century, that situation does not occur except where there's been a premature death. User:Iwanafish~~appears to be, or has been, a respected editor on Chinese porcelain- so there seems to be a change in editing behaviour.~~ Ning-ning (talk) 07:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Struck that- just followed through a situation where Iwanafish was in conflict with another editor over salt-glazed pottery. Ning-ning (talk) 07:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Having been in genealogy for over 25 years, I have seen stranger things! Remember my reference regarding the French names being translated into English in that time period.

Regarding user Iwannafish, most of his articles cite himself as a source. They are mostly self-promotion. Check out his contributions. text removed ... Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's really not cool to try and Out another editor. I suggest we not discuss the other editor's hair or other attributes. If he keeps up with the editing, you'll need to find an administrator to help out. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

The information in the lead should summarize information in the body of the article. Thus, nothing should appear in the lead that isn't in the body of the article. I'm going to rearrange a bit to make this the case. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What else needs to be done? Jrcrin001 (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Carpenter (bishop). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716074104/http://www.worcestershire.gov.uk/cms/pdf/Alvechurch.pdf to http://www.worcestershire.gov.uk/cms/pdf/Alvechurch.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]