Jump to content

Talk:Joint Task Force Guantanamo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

explanation

[edit]

I was concerned over this edit, which I believe introduced inaccuracies.

It is true that Obama has replaced Bush. I do not believe it is true that the Obama administration has taken a position as to whether to leave intact the Bush policy of classifying the captives as "enemy combatants". Maybe the Obama administration will leave intact this aspect of the Bush detainee policy. And when this is announced the article can be updated to reflect that.

So I reverted it.

Further, as I have argued elsewhere, calling the captives "detainees" is not neutral. We are not supposed to take sides. "Detainee" inappropriately implies there legitimacy to the captives' detention. As I have stated elsewhere "captive" is a more neutral compromise. Geo Swan (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed your edits. Please be advised that ascribing a legal definition to an individual President and his administration, as opposed to a nation as a whole, is itself a violation of POV. Please be further advised that describing someone as a "captive" is also a violation of POV, and is not neutral. Given these facts, I will be making appropriate changes to the article to achieve neutrality. Thank you.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 22:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Joint Task Force Guantanamo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Joint Task Force Guantanamo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]