Talk:Light therapy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Light therapy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Light therapy.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Archives (Index) |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2022 and 24 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Claudia Iparraguirre (article contribs).
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
My last edit - questions to katewishing
[edit]I am a novice in Wikipedia and would like your help in understanding teh nature of editing. You reverted today all my edits .
I believe that I added a lot of useful and refined information to these article and I am sorry that they were deleted.
Few specific questions:
[1] I added a reference to a FDA cleared targeted Phototherapy device - Multiclear.
You deleted it. On the other hand you did leave in the article reference to 2 other devices: B Clear and Theralight. What is the difference ? I personally do not see why mentioning these 2 and not the third.
[2] Blue light acne therapy is today in the mainstream of acne therapy. The FDA cleared this treatment formally for this indication. The are dozens of review articles and dozens of clinical studies in teh best peer review journal that accept it;s efficacy as one of the acne treatment. It is extremely useful for people who can not take drugs. Hard to understand why all these references were deleted.
[3] Photosensitivity to drugs is a big problem. In my edit I tried to highlight the problem in people under psyciatric treatment that are exposed to this possible side effects. Why was it deleted ?
What is promotional here ?
Best wishes, Skin58 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skin58 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- You removed a 2012 review that states "
there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of [light] therapies for the treatment of acne. Studies of these products typically lack controls, have small sample sizes, are short term, and do not compare these therapies with validated pharmacologic treatments.
" Most of the sources you replaced that with are dated or primary. Only two of the sources you added meet WP:MEDRS guidelines. The first is a 2011 book, and it is consistent with our statement that further research is needed, not that the efficacy has already been proved:"The studies to date are promising; however, further investigation is necessary to determine safety, long-term efficacy, and optimal parameters of lasers and light sources."
[1]
- Your second acceptable source is a 2012 review. This one does say that "
Blue light therapy is a clinically accepted approach for Propionibacterium acnes infections."
However, it contradicts multiple other reviews that state the evidence is limited, and the lead authors have published numerous studies on blue light therapy, which puts their objectivity in question. - The entire "FDA approved devices" section should probably be removed per WP:NOTCATALOG. KateWishing (talk) 19:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Should not include Photodynamic therapy
[edit]Why is Photodynamic therapy included here under techniques - PDT is light activation of photosensitive drugs. Maybe 'light therapy' is too general a term and should be a disambiguation page ? - Rod57 (talk) 03:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Diabetic retinopathy
[edit]Light therapy is being used to treat Diabetic Retinopathy and is available commercially (Noctura 400 mask - www.noctura.com). There is significant evidence that retinal stimulation will treat this condition in humans from a number of unbiased relatable sources such as
Eye (Lond). 2011 Dec;25(12):1546-54. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.264. Epub 2011 Oct 21
and there are clinical trials underway
Trials. 2014 Nov 22;15:458. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-458.
How do we add this or similar references (there are quite a few available) to show that there is a body of evidence that light therapy can be used for this treatment?
Also I'm keen to add something on other forms of light therapy. I've been carrying out extensive research (part of my job) in this area and want to get the message out.
Northernalex (talk) 14:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC) northernalex
- Unfortunately, it looks like your entry above was ignored, Northernalex. But by way of belated response: clinical trials are not usually considered sufficiently reliable for inclusion on Wikipedia— we have a strong preference for secondary sources, which have reviewed the results of one or more clinical trials, and there are editors who will insist on such sources, even if there are plenty of primary ones which demonstrate the same point. However, if you are able to provide some legitimate published sources that demonstrate this fact, by all means feel free to include them. Your expertise in this field is the kind of thing which Wikipedia takes for granted far too often! If you have any questions, leave me a message on my talk page. A loose necktie (talk) 08:36, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Sources in intro
[edit]My understanding is that an appropriate article introduction rarely needs citations in it - the intro is a summary, and specific claims/contentions/facts are cited within the body. Krb19 added a raft of citations to the intro, and I'm wondering if they could be moved into the body instead. I know way too little about the topic to do so myself though. Anastrophe (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I had added the citations in response to a [medical citation needed] tag that was placed in the intro. I've now moved some to the relevant sections of the body and removed a second reference to one citation. I agree that intro sections don't usually need citations, but for medical information that is in any way contested I think they are appropriate. I suspect someone had particular concern about the use of light therapy in non-seasonal psychiatric conditions, which is not long established. Krb19 (talk) 23:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you kindly for the explanation, and the fix. Anastrophe (talk) 23:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Citation 82 page not found
[edit]title says it all 80.242.44.207 (talk) 10:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Title
[edit]I suggest renaming Light therapy into Phototherapy or Bright light therapy and creating a disambiguation page for Light therapy that would list:
- Phototherapy (aka Bright light therapy)
- Low-level laser therapy (aka red light therapy)
- Ultraviolet light therapy
- PUVA therapy
- Photodynamic therapy
- Photothermal therapy
- Goeckerman therapy
- Chromotherapy (aka "Colored light therapy")
- Blood irradiation therapy
- Crib A'Glow
- UV-B lamps
- Bili light
- GreenLight Laser Therapy
- C-Class Physiology articles
- Mid-importance Physiology articles
- Physiology articles about an unassessed area
- WikiProject Physiology articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- C-Class dermatology articles
- Mid-importance dermatology articles
- Dermatology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors