Jump to content

Talk:List of accolades received by Spotlight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of accolades received by Spotlight is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 9, 2016Featured list candidatePromoted

Sortable

[edit]

@IreneTandry: WP:OVERLINKING does not apply to sortable tables as it depends on how you sort. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: For WP:OVERLINKING, whatever you want. In my own opinion, there's no need to sort as the nominees are dominated by Tom McCarthy, Josh Singer, some casts and crews. IreneTandry (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay whether they are dominated by the crews or the pretty Rachel McAdams. We should follow other lists. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: We? Really? Maybe you... I follow many lists, not just this list. –IreneTandry (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It was how it passed as an FL and I don't see a reason for unlinking the entries just because you think they are "dominated by Tom McCarthy, Josh Singer, some casts and crews". – FrB.TG (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: Whatever. This page is yours. I won't edit again. –IreneTandry (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is certainly not my article, I just have happened to work on it; see WP:OWN. I don't agree with your edit as I think it is against the current consensus we have on awards list. If you do not want to edit again, suit yourself. FrB.TG (talk) 21:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@FrB.TG: Do you reject me from Wikipedia? It's very amazing. –IreneTandry (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please read what I said and read what you said yourself. It's not up to me to 'reject' anybody. I am an editor just like you and we (except for vandals of course) are all equal. Don't take it personally - I just don't agree with your point, that's all. – FrB.TG (talk) 21:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@IreneTandry: is correct; it is WP:OVERLINKING to have terms wikilinked over and over and over. Most readers view the same default chronological / alphabetical sort, but even if not, linking once in a table is adequate. Wikipedia guidelines are very clear that we don't have a WP:SEA OF BLUE.--Tenebrae (talk) 06:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of accolades received by Spotlight (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of accolades received by Spotlight (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of accolades received by Spotlight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this correct?

[edit]

"Adam Richards dan Paul Schnee", actually "Adam Richards and Paul Schnee" right?--Jarodalien (talk) 15:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. FrB.TG (talk) 19:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_accolades_received_by_Spotlight&oldid=1208198075"