Talk:Mamta Kulkarni

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India: Maharashtra Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Mamta Kulkarni be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in New York City may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

Mamta Kulkarni is embraced as sex symbol in india.I would like to reveal more positive aspects about her.She was having gifted attributes one must admit it.Holywarrior 12:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC) A sensuous pic of Mamta is desirable on this page.Can anybody help?????Holywarrior 11:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are behaving like an obsessed fan rather than a serious Wikipedian. Not only are your claims unverifiable, but they show clear bias, and are in many case, factually inaccurate. The references are to a fansite, and not credible. Finally, your control over the English language is atrocious. Please stop reverting, and stay away from this page.

Gamesmasterg9 18:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Gamesmaster G9[reply]

Hi Gamesmaster ,What makes you believe I am her fan and so what even if I am???
May I know what are your proofs of Not only are your claims unverifiable, but they show clear bias, and are in many case, factually inaccurate and if you don't have any proofs ,need I tell who is biased.
Finally, your control over the English language is atrocious. Please stop reverting, and stay away from this page.--Where did you learn these great facts about me??? Seems like you have done good homework on me,I feel flattered,I request you to complain against me for my atrocious english if these are reasons enough for keeping me away from these pages.By the way WHO ARE YOU to TELL me stay away from this pageYour propositions are against wikipedia policy and may be treated as personal attack. I refuse to follow you.FULL STOP.--Holywarrior 07:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which is a better version

Please compare these two versions and tell which one is better.[1],[2] --Holywarrior 07:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both versions are poory written, but at least the older version is not full of grammatical errors. Gamesmasterg9 10:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English Grammar

Observing your writing is enough to conclude about your lack of control over English. The inappropriate use of tense and missing articles are errors they teach you not to make in Primary School. Here are examples.

She has been considered as one of most Sexy heroines of her time.

has been considered? And shouldn't there be a 'the' in there somewhere? Not only that, this statement is in itself unverifiable and does not conform to NPOV.

However China Gate endorsed her acting skills.

China Gate was a movie, and hence cannot 'endorse' anything. Check the exact meaning of the word.

She was the trendsetter in topless ad on Stardust which was soon followed by many other actresses.

trendsetter in topless ad!! This makes absolutely no sense. The use of the word trendsetter is inappropriate anyway, and the second part of the sentence does not follow from the first. Above unsigned comments are from Gamesmasterg9 Holywarrior 13:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!!! Congrats for finding few faults---Calling Grammatical mistakes.But I think you have been following some old fashioned Grammarians,usage of articles has been drastically minimised in modern english,BTW are you a primary school English teacher.I admit having made these mistakes,but these are not enough reason to erase the full contents.I don't think you have contributed anything into this article accept for tagging that message on this article and few other articles in a very dubious manner .Try to provide logic for why you want to differ.Don't say someone who is contributing as poor contributor.Both versions are OK,it is all about your POV how you judge.I had put those diffs for comparision of POV,they may be rated one or two in order of preferences but your version will lag behind by miles because that is nothing but content killing.Holywarrior 13:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After going through contribution history of user:Gamesmasterg9,I could find him/her to be a contributor who has to his credit addition or delition of few words in most of the diffs I could find.Good work anyway provided you don't mess with real contributors.Holywarrior 13:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at this version of the page written by you. [3]. 'best developed breasts'!!! 'sexiest actress'! 'envied by other actresses'??? What would you call this if not POV. AS for my contribution to the article, I had planned on writing a proper entry, but am still looking for verifiable sources for specific dates. Until that time, I have been removing statements that I consider POV.Gamesmasterg9 17:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the use of articles has been minimised in modern English!!! Where did you go to school? Gamesmasterg9 17:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not where you teach English Grammar rather I think where you take lessons for English grammar.Some articles are supposed to contain matured contents,sex and breast are not bad words,if you know the proper definition.Regarding usage of Article read Mahatma Gandhi's My Experiment with Truth.Holywarrior 08:33, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmmmmm.You have carved out your own version including all the elements from my version and have used those "Bad Words" too.Besides many statements are your POVs.One frank question,does the Telegraph citation really exist????? Another citation of yours yielded error.WOW you are master of this art.Holywarrior 08:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At no point have I even hinted that I objected to the "offensive" words. I only objected to your POV statements and bad grammar. Regarding your objections :-

1) The Telegraph archives are down at this moment. They should be up soon enough, and you can check. You can check on the status of the archives here [4] 2) Regarding the POV over her exact moment of fame, I have changed the wording to make it less POV. 3) The Telegraph electronic archives do not extend to the date for the magazine link, so it is impossible to provide an electronic version. However, I stand by the accuracy of the link, and am removing the citation request. Not all references need to be electronic - as mentioned here [5]. If you do not believe me, you can check for yourself. I can give you the address of their archives in Calcutta.Gamesmasterg9 10:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to fix grammatical mistakes and did some clean up too in Career section(written by you)reataining all the contributions made by you.I hope you will follow the same spirit in future.Look here for diffs [6].Holywarrior 16:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mamta kulkarni's career graph,her education and her achievements.

Hi ,my name is musquan khan,imtiaz khan,we are a fan club in Dubai. we thaught all your iformation about this great star is totally negative.which has put us in a negative frame of mind about your site and its intentions.it seem you had an exceptional set of group of journalists or acquaintences who seem to have contributed to only negative verbal diarrrehea regards the most beautiful actress.

FIRST : your opinion about mamta's education and her marathi accent which you call her a vern? i imtiaz khan i am a reporter to BBC LONDON NEWS CHANNEL.i was a first person to interview MAMTA in 1996 when she came for a concert with sharukh khan and aamir khan with morani brothers. infact during our interview i asked have you studied in London/USA? and she said no .so my next question to her but obiviously was than how come you have so good comand over english ? to this she said she has studied in " ST'JOSEPH'S CONVENT " WHERE? Juhu,bombay-india .she continued that all st'josephs' English had an british accent ? then we went to her school in india,spoke to her principal by name MARIAGORETTI who rememdered mamta as a brilliant student who scored arround 75% of marks in her 9th standarad and how mamta wanted to leave school and join films.to which the principal almost shrugged her mother for distracting her daughter who was so brilliant.

So it is very surprising that you could call someone with such a command over the british language a vern or probably the person who has coated her seems to us to be actually a vern himself/herself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.42.21.83 (talk) 12:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

File:Mamtakulkarni.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mamtakulkarni.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mamtakulkarni.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spouse, religion & residence

@OccultZone: I have provided splendid references from national dailies like 'Times of India' & Pakistan Daily. How can you say those are poorly referenced and threatening me for blocking? I appreciate if you could tell me how you used a dead reference for citing her |religion: Hinduism. !-- https://www.facebook.com/mamtam.kulkarni/posts/343961755735483 -- -varma (talk) 18:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirmed if she converted or married, she has denied these rumors on her facebook. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

appka kiya kihna

Kiya yi sahi hi ATA ULLAH (talk) 15:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mamta Kulkarni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120209024822/http://ww.smashits.com/interview-mamta-kulkarni-the-aftermath/interview-846.html to http://ww.smashits.com/interview-mamta-kulkarni-the-aftermath/interview-846.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mamta kulkarni Martial Status officially is Not Married so a live in relation without court registration can't be considered legal so her husband can't be mentioned as Vicki Goswami please erase this reference and Martial status

Mamta kulkarni's marriage is not legalised in any courts in the world so a live in person or relation can't be called husband so please amend her martial status Bollywoodfacts100 (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Mamta-kulkarni.jpg.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]