Talk:Naomi Wilzig

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

my rewrite

I just rewrote the article based on the information it already contained and a little bit from her husband's article; I did very little additional research and the whole thing could well be a tissue of lies, for all I know. A note: the husband's article lists 1953 for the marriage, and this one says 1956. Also, I tried to include a reference to an examiner.com story, but apparently that's a spam domain. Here's the ref, minus the link: Libov, Charlotte. www.examiner.com/article/world-erotic-art-museum-day-proclaimed-miami-beach "'World Erotic Art Museum Day' proclaimed in Miami Beach" Examiner.com. October 19, 2010. Retrieved 21 February 2013. squibix (talk) 02:32, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Though I don't know the correct marriage date, the article is by no means a "tissue of lies". There are plenty of reliable sources available, and I have added several to the article. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No no, of course not. I was just saying that I hadn't done any verification myself, in case someone started to make trouble re: BLP violations. I was very sleepy while doing the work and didn't trust myself to find appropriate citations, let alone format them correctly. Thanks for your awesome work! squibix (talk) 11:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

headings

Given the current brevity of this article, I think it might be better off without as many sections and headings. The "Museum" heading seems particularly problematic, because it is as much about Wilzig herself as it is the museum; similarly the "Collection" section seems like it has just as much to say about the museum. "Early Years" also takes us all the way up to 2005, when Wilzig was 71, so while it's true that maybe she hadn't attained encyclopedic notability until that point, I don't know if early is quite correct. Anyways, I would favor removing the heading, as per my first edit to the article, but that's my stylistic prejudice in any case; I'm open to contrary arguments. squibix (talk) 11:50, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naomi Wilzig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101010223054/http://travel.nytimes.com/travel/guides/north-america/united-states/florida/miami/36027/the-world-erotic-museum/attraction-detail.html to http://travel.nytimes.com/travel/guides/north-america/united-states/florida/miami/36027/the-world-erotic-museum/attraction-detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]