Talk:National Technical Institute for the Deaf

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Deaf Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

National Technical Institute for the Deaf is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

New York (state): Western NY

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Low-importance).

First "technological college" in the world for deaf/HoH?

I'm not sure what exactly the definition of a "technological college" is — see college for different uses of the term college around the world. I thought it must be a US-specific term (making the claim to being the "biggest in the world" a little redundant!) but if it means an institution offering vocational education then it's certainly not the first in the world either. Can someone please clarify for readers outside the US?

On another note, adjectives like "excellent" and "outstanding" have more place in a brochure than an encyclopedia. ntennis 07:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe "technological" is meant in the sense of "not liberal-arts". Galluadet is considered a liberal arts university, for example. Likewise, RIT itself is not a liberal-arts university, even though it has a College of Liberal Arts. I'm not sure how the distinction is made, but it exists.

I also agree that the whole article sounds like it was copied from a brochure or, more likely, the web site. Powers 14:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed

Togamoos, you offered no explanation for why you removed the citeneeded tags, so I've replaced them and I'll explain why, one by one. The article makes the following claims:

RIT is internationally recognized as a leader in computing, engineering, imaging technology, fine and applied arts. "Recognized as a leader" is a weasel worded claim and can be improved by stating who recognizes RIT as a leader. This will make the fact verifiable. Who recognizes RIT as a leader? Its students? Its faculty? A government? A magazine?
U.S. News and World Report has consistently ranked RIT among the nation’s leading comprehensive universities. Fair enough, at least this claim can be verified. But not without a date or issue cited. Readers of an encyclopedia should not be expected to search through decades of back issues to verify or learn more. In fact, according to U.S. New and World Report: 2006 National Universities: Top Schools rankings, RIT doesn't rank within the top 120. So I've removed that claim for now. "Consistently ranked" implies every year or at least regularly over a significant period of time. Perhaps you can help with a cite here and replace the claim.
RIT is internationally recognized as a leader in computing, engineering, imaging technology, fine and applied arts. This is weasel-worded, as the first point is. Recognized by who and what nations? This fact needs to be verifiable, according to WP policy.
RIT has the largest staff of professional sign language interpreters of any college program in the country and is one of the most accessible college communities in the world. There are two claims there and I can't find either backed up by a primary source using either http://www.ntid.rit.edu itself or Google.

Thanks for listening. I'm not disagreeing with any of these claims, but if we don't keep articles well-sourced from reliable and verifiable primary sources then Wikipedia loses its value. --Ds13 22:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NTID Marketing

As noted in my last edit of this page, I removed a lot that was clearly just marketing for NTID by NTID. For further editors of this page, note that RIT IP addresses (and therefore NTID IPs) start with 129.21.

Copyright violation

I removed text added by Togamoos (talk · contribs) that was a clear copyright violation from [1]. If Togamoos has permission to copy this information, we'll need to see evidence of that, per WP:COPY. Powers 13:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Theatre shadowing

I just reverted an edit that added Theatre shadowing to the See also section. I'm not opposed to having a link to this (orphaned!) article in the NTID article, because there's some text in Theatre shadowing that mentions special reverse-shadowing practices at NTID (but alas, it's unsourced).

If the fact can be sourced and discussion of it incorporated in the NTID article text, that'd be great! I can't do it rn though, because I'm trying to finish finals. >_> - - mathmitch7 ^{(talk/contribs)} 22:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Technical Institute for the Deaf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130115042758/http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/20C20a.txt to http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/20C20A.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]