Talk:Nestlé Purina PetCare
Nestlé Purina PetCare has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 26, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nestlé Purina PetCare article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Redundancy
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I am affiliated with the article-subject and have a disclosed COI. I noticed the current article, under History/Legal issues has two redundant sentences referring to the same lawsuit:
In 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Purina, claiming that the dog food manufactured by the company was hazardous for pets.[1]
Later in that section the page states:
In 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Purina. It alleged that the company's Beneful brand of dog food contained toxic ingredients. Purina said these ingredients were FDA-approved.[2][3]
They both seem to be referring to the same lawsuit. I suggest keeping the second one and trimming the first sentence, as the second reference to the lawsuit has more detail and better sources. CorporateM (Talk) 12:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Missouri Dog Treat Class Action Settlement, Hectamedia, May 20, 2015, retrieved May 1, 2016
- ^ Silva, Daniella (February 24, 2015). "Lawsuit Claims Purina's Beneful Is Poisoning, Killing Dogs". NBC News. Retrieved February 25, 2015.
- ^ Hernandez, Jodi; Fernandez, Lisa. "Dogs Were "Poisoned": Discovery Bay Man Sues Purina After His Dogs Die, Get Sick". NBC. Retrieved February 27, 2015.
Reply 2-APR-2019
[edit]- I've removed the first mention of this and kept the second mention. But I removed the claim from Purina that these ingredients are FDA approved. The mycotoxins are produced by mold found in grains. It is this toxin — and not the grain itself — which is being blamed for the pet illnesses. Spintendo 04:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Class Action
[edit]The current article-text states:
In 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Purina alleging that the company's Beneful brand of dog food contained toxins produced by mold found in grains — grain being a major ingredient in Beneful.[35][36]
It seems to flow logically that the article should include the fact that the case was dismissed. Can we add something like the following?
The lawsuit was later changed to a claim of false advertising rather than harm to pets, but eventually all claims against Nestlé Purina were dismissed by the court.[1]
CorporateM (Talk) 19:58, 17 June 2019 (UTC) Edit request implemented
- CorporateM I added more info to clarify what happened, with a better non-adblock-blocked source. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 19:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Judge dismisses Beneful lawsuit". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. November 18, 2016. Archived from the original on March 24, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- GA-Class Brands articles
- Low-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- GA-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- GA-Class Missouri articles
- Low-importance Missouri articles
- GA-Class St. Louis articles
- Mid-importance St. Louis articles
- GA-Class Dogs articles
- Low-importance Dogs articles
- WikiProject Dogs articles
- Articles with connected contributors
- Implemented requested edits