While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Longevity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the World's oldest people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LongevityWikipedia:WikiProject LongevityTemplate:WikiProject LongevityLongevity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
In one interview, she says she got married at 13. Possibly she had to declare being older for the marriage to be valid. 1909–1917 = 8 years difference, so she could have claimed to be 21. Such cases were relatively common in those days. But that's just speculation; we must wait for RS to clarify this. — JFGtalk19:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The "public records" source that is cited in this article is a conglomeration of data and is notoriously unreliable. It should not be considered a primary source, and if it is the only source of doubt in McLaurin's birthdate, I would recommend discounting the doubt altogether. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉05:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The source of doubt is that a large number of cases of extreme age have turned out to be false, based on either outright intentional fraud for one motive or another or just the consequences of someone guessing at their unknown birthdate, and being off by enough that it turned out to be an implausible number later in life. This is a person who has no documentation of her actual birth, has claimed multiple different birth years, and has excuses that don't hold up to scrutiny as to why she has done so (e.g. she refused to access the digital copy of her South Carolina non-driver ID after she remembered it was "stolen" years earlier and went through a whole process of getting media assistance in replacing her documents from scratch that was unnecessary; the simplest possible explanation is she didn't want anyone seeing the 1917 birthdate on the old ID). I'm sure Virginia McLaurin was a nice enough person, and I know people are sensitive about criticizing anyone who has a connection to the Obamas, but she probably was never 113 years old and the reason for doubting it are the same as doubting almost any claim of such - because there's evidence to the contrary. Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is made egregious by the total lack of skepsis in the current text. A reader without knowledge of the topic would take it as a flat fact that the individual was one of the oldest ever, a super when in fact she probably was not. This is politics and a model wiki failure. When I saw the MSM blurbs I went right to the gerontology wiki and then came here to see if I would find something like this. I didn expect it to be this complete. 98.4.112.204 (talk) 09:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just looked through the sources, which are poor fluff-piece articles in second-rate news sites, no real significant coverage; none of them say she is Black, or African-American; several of them imply this and mention how she coos about her Black President with a Black Wife, but no article I could find actually discusses McLaurin's ethnicity directly. Elizium23 (talk) 18:10, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So the reliable sources bogey works for this but not for the central claim to notability. Maybe slow down a lil bit and look at the merits of each article individually. 98.4.112.204 (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note also that under the Jim Crow Laws, it was sometimes very complicated to have birth certificates for Black Americans, which weren't recorded every time or were recorded with errors.
I am not sure that it is proper for us to include comments like this in this article, since none of those sources have connected these cases with that of McLaurin's. It's WP:SYNTH. Elizium23 (talk) 03:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The right thing to do would be to redact "supercentenarian" to "semisupercentenarian". I would do it but I want to see how this works out. Lycurgus (talk) 12:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(i'm lycurgus)@Elizium23, that's not how claims of being supercentenarian work. The situation of false claims of this status are so common that they are presumed false unless they have been verified by an entity that vets such claims. In this case the weight of the evidence is that the person was born in 1916 or later and the claim of there being a 'birth certificate in a bible' is clearly specious, worthless in establishing such a claim. You may want to look into how claims of being a super are verified. FWIW, as things stand now, extreme longevity is not an especial respecter of class, Calment notwithstanding, and many would be claimants have class origins consistent with making specious claims, it's very common. The reason for this is that current supers, and centenarians ftm, reach that status as a result of their superior genetics. That will likely change later this century. 98.4.112.204 (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
