User talk:Ali Ahwazi

Please can you upload your information? I am reading some of your write up and I wish to know whose write up am reading.

Copyright problem: Husayn ibn Ali

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Husayn ibn Ali, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://en.wikishia.net/view/Imam_al-Husayn_b._'Ali_(a)#Imamate, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Husayn ibn Ali and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Husayn ibn Ali, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Husayn ibn Ali. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Husayn ibn Ali with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Husayn ibn Ali saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! --HyperGaruda (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ali Ahwazi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TimothyJosephWood 12:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Ali Ahwazi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TimothyJosephWood 12:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Iran–Iraq War into Siege of Basra). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ali Ahwazi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abbas Ka'bi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Abdullah ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib

Hello, Ali Ahwazi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Abdullah ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 11:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sayyidat Nisa al-Alamin

Hello! Your submission of Sayyidat Nisa al-Alamin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Taqi Shushtari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Muhammad Taqi Shushtari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Javert2113 (talk; please ping me in your reply on this page) 19:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I messed up my CSD tagging. I hope you can forgive me for labeling your page incorrectly. — Javert2113 (talk; please ping me in your reply on this page) 19:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Al-Atabat Al-Aliyat) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Al-Atabat Al-Aliyat, Ali Ahwazi!

Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article, but the lead needs to be more specific. After reading it, I think I know what the title of the article refers to, but I am not sure. Is it the shrines (and if so, is it 4 or 6)? Is it the cities? Is it the Imams? Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Sayyidat Nisa al-Alamin

Hello. Last month, two users left messages on the nomination page regarding the article, and they have pointed out that there are still some issue that need to be addressed. Please edit the article to solve these problems; as the article has not been edited since April, and the comments have not received responses, the nomination will be marked as stale and may be closed in the next few days unless a prompt response is done. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew

Muhammad Taqi Shushtari moved to draftspace

This article is almost completely incomprehensible in its present form. Was this person an Islamic scholatr, an author, a poet? When did he live - that one date in the article (1902) is obviously completely off the mark)? What was his significance? Just listing a lot of names does not make an accpetable encyclopedic article. Please add some intelligible substance here, otherwise this won't be usable on Wikipedia.

When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Muhammad ibn Musa al-Kadhim (Sabze Ghaba)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Muhammad ibn Musa al-Kadhim (Sabze Ghaba), Ali Ahwazi!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A well-referenced article.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ali Ahwazi. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Sayyidat Nisa al-Alamin.
Message added 13:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Taqi Shushtari (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Taqi Shushtari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muhammad Taqi Shushtari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 04:37, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Military history

Hello Ali Ahwazi! Thank you for your contributions to military history-related articles.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors who are also working on military history topics, please take a look at the WikiProject Military history—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please add your username here, and a project coordinator will soon be along to welcome you. If you're not sure about joining, why not sign up to receive our monthly newsletter, The Bugle? It is a great way to get a feel for the project. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Iranian peoples, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ali Ahwazi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ali Ahwazi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move of Ali Hashemi (weightlifter)

I see that you have already been warned, but let me do it again since it was apparently not clear. You have copied the article from Ali Hashemi to Ali Hashemi (Weightlifter) and created a disambig article at Ali Hashemi. The problem with that is that the editing history of the article was lost, which is technically speaking a copyright violation. Another, minor, problem is that weightlifter should not have been capitalized. I solved both by moving the old version to Ali Hashemi to Ali Hashemi (weightlifter), and redirecting Ali Hashemi (weightlifter). Now you can create a disambig at Ali Hashemi. Note however that all the links from the articles related to the weightlifter now go to Ali Hashemi, and they must be fixed before the disambig has been created.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: firstly I appreciate your consideration/edition; secondly I was wondering if you meant that I currently can create a disambig in this page (by removing all of its current content, and add the disambig instead?)? (e.g. like this page?) Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, exactly, but please mind the incoming links.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: (E.g.) is it appropriate like this?Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

I expanded it a bit like this.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

"View History" of Dhakir

@Ymblanter:, Would you please tell me that: how can I clean the extra history of Dhakir? I mean: I created a text (as a page) in my sandbox by the name/topic of "Dhakir", then I pasted it in the page which was the redirect of "Dhakir" to "Dhikr". Currently, the problem is that: when I refer to the "view history" of the new independent created page of Dhakir, then the activities of the "view history" of the previous/another page (Dhikr) can be seen -- as well as Dhakir's history), would you kindly fix it? P.S.: then, an user changed it, and wrote: "redirect target is both older and better developed. RV to redirect". So, I don't exactly know what I should do now to revert it. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 15:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

I am not quite sure - are you saying that Dhakir and Dhikr should exist at two separate articles, or that Dhakir is a better name, and Dhikr should redirect to it?--Ymblanter (talk) 09:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: I'm saying that both of them should exist at two separate articles. Dhakir/Dhikr are not precisely the same. AFAIK, in the current existing article (dhikr), it has mentioned --very briefly-- only in a sentence that: "A person who recites the Dhikr is called a ḏākir ([ˈðaːkɪr] ذاكر)." But it has not explained more about it (since it needs more details...). So, I created a separated article about "Dhakir" with more related details/explanation in about three paragraphs which could be more helpful for readers. The user who has removed my article, wrote that: (redirect target is both older and better developed. RV to redirect). Well, I was wondering how I can create it in a new page/article? (Would you kindly fix it)? Ali Ahwazi (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

I think the best way to proceed would be to open a talk page discussion and to invite the user there. If there is a decision to move, I can easily fix the page history.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:12, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Sadiq Ahangaran) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sadiq Ahangaran.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Would love to get an infobox in this article. Would also love to see more for English readers about what a Zaker is and why he is so notable in Iran. thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Taqi Shushtari (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by StraussInTheHouse were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Taqi Shushtari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muhammad Taqi Shushtari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about U.S. intervention in Venezuela

Hello, Ali Ahwazi,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Jamez42 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, U.S. intervention in Venezuela should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. intervention in Venezuela .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jamez42}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Jamez42 (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve U.S. intervention in Venezuela

Hello, Ali Ahwazi,

Thanks for creating U.S. intervention in Venezuela! I edit here too, under the username Jamez42 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Restoring POV tag included before

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jamez42}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Jamez42 (talk) 21:24, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muhammad Taqi Shushtari

Hello, Ali Ahwazi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muhammad Taqi Shushtari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Hedayatollah Behboudi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hedayatollah Behboudi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedayatollah Behboudi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Personasiran (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Mohammad Qomi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Qomi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Qomi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Personasiran (talk) 16:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Ali Jafari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alef-Laam Khomeini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ali Ahwazi

Thank you for creating Hormuz-2 (missile).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Special Barnstar
		For your tireless efforts on editing Iranian missiles سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ(talk) 13:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Operation Dawn 7 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Dawn 7 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Dawn 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

War of 1812

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Elinruby (talk) 08:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

War of 1812 some more

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theory/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Elinruby (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sharh-e Esm (book) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharh-e Esm (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharh-e Esm (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ladsgroup^overleg 18:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Navigation

Hallo, Thank you for creating Hoveyzeh (armored car). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Hoveyzeh), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 08:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Best greetings; I appreciate you for mentioning the helpful issue. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 06:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

But you seem not to have taken any notice: the same applies to Yasin (jet), which I have added to Yasin for you. PamD 17:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Oh, yes, I got it. Thanks again. I'll take more notice for this helpful point. Good luck.Ali Ahwazi (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Lighthouses and military

Hi you and other Wikipedians may be interested to take part in the discussions at Talk:Lighthouses in Hong Kong, Talk:Military of Hong Kong and Talk:List of lighthouses in Macau. 219.76.24.203 (talk) 10:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Barakat Foundation

added a link pointing to Corona

Ehsan Foundation (Iran)

added a link pointing to Corona

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVIran Barakat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YJC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Iran's parliament representatives (10th term), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lenjan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Iran's parliament representatives (8th term)

added links pointing to Saravan, Assyrian, Maneh, Raz, Mehran, Jargalan and Iranshahr

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ehsan Foundation (Iran) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ehsan Foundation (Iran) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Foundation (Iran) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Persia ☘ 07:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Beseh-Rahbari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beseh-Rahbari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beseh-Rahbari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Persia ☘ 08:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of 4030 Call System for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 4030 Call System is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4030 Call System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Persia ☘ 08:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding hoaxes to articles with faked citations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

In particular, your recent edits to the Islamophobia in Australia are blatant hoaxes, as they include non-existent ministers and senators. I note that these edits are very similar in nature to others you have made to other articles which basically comprise copied and pasted 'quotes' referenced to obscure sources. I think that all of these edits need to be treated with great suspicion. Nick-D (talk) 23:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Honestly, I was surprised to see that I became indef, but I must admit that I had to be much more careful. You wrote in your comment that I have mentioned senators who do not exist. I have to explain that: in this edition, by Nick Zenfon, I actually meant Nick Xenophon. This has been my negligence and I am sorry about that. Nick Xenophon's remarks can also be seen on the BBC and The Guardian (Please ctrl + f "heartbreaking"). The deportation of Logan Robertson can also be seen in this source. This explanation is not to say that I do not accept my mistakes, but in fact I intend to request that I be given another chance to continue my editing. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 07:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am not convinced that these sorts of mistakes will not recur. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Nick-D:, @331dot:, I want more help from you. I have tried to make constructive edits and contribute to the encyclopedia. I reviewed my contributions and for the start I think I should be more careful when using sources. The accepted sources for Wikipedia is defined WP:Reliable sources. My mistakes were not intentional and I should work harder to avoid them in future. But I still need help and guidance to continue this activity. I would like to request you unblock me and I will be more careful when making edits. Thank you. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 07:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@Nick-D:, @331dot:, I want more help from you. I have tried to make constructive edits and contribute to the encyclopedia. I reviewed my contributions and for the start I think I should be more careful when using sources. The accepted sources for Wikipedia is defined WP:Reliable sources. My mistakes were not intentional and I should work harder to avoid them in future. But I still need help and guidance to continue this activity. I would like to request you unblock me and I will be more careful when making edits. Thank you. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

The editor has provided assurances they will take care. Nick-D (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

The kindest interpretation of your editing is that you are not taking steps to avoid making easily avoidable errors, so that doesn't convince me I'm afraid. Nick-D (talk) 23:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

@Nick-D:, @331dot:, of course, I mentioned it before, but I wanted to say again that I realized my mistakes and now that it is blocked, I really need you to give me another chance to be able to use credible sources more accurately. Also: You wrote in your comment that I have mentioned senators who do not exist. I have to explain that in this edition: in fact I meant "Nick Xenophon" but wrongly I wrote "Nick Zenfon"; And I do not mean just this, and there must have been other mistakes, too. This has been my negligence and I am sorry about that. Therefore, I will try to make the next edits more carefully. Thanks a lot. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

As I've reviewed a request, I can't review another, so there is no further need to ping me here. 331dot (talk) 07:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

If you would like your unblock request to be taken seriously, please provide more detail on how you will avoid similar problems in the future. For instance, please explain how you will identify reliable sources and take care with editing to avoid adding inaccuracies to articles. Nick-D (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you dear 331dot.

@Nick-D:, I did more research and as far as I realized: the more challenging content should provide a more credible source for it. A source that has a reputation for fact checking can be considered credible. In this regard, I can get help from other users through this page. Users need to be more careful about living people. Sometimes content needs to be attributed to the source. But in general, there are many things and details that I gradually learn. Thank you for considering my request. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Ali Ahwazi, one thing I would recommend to you, if you're unblocked, is to use English language reliable sources instead of Farsi language sources. It seems your translations are not entirely accurate (for example, you said Logan Robertson was a "priest", but he's actually a pastor). You can go back to Farsi only when you get better at translating.VR _talk 05:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ali Ahwazi, as noted below, your improper use of comma did give a false impression. I'd recommend reading up more on proper use of punctuation. Here is one illustrated guide on how improper punctuation use can be problematic.VR _talk 20:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

• Hello Nick-D, you said that Ali Ahwazi added hoaxes to Islamophobia in Australia, can you explain? I can see that he didn't use a reliable source to cite his claims about living people - and that's a serious concern. But his additions to that article aren't hoaxes and can be verified by reliable sources[1][2][3] (as he explained). I agree that his writing contains several typos and other mistakes that make the content inaccurate, but I don't see mal-intent behind those mistakes.VR _talk 05:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Claiming that the "Australian Immigration Minister" is "Logan Robertson" and that there is a "Senator Nick Zenfon" (there is a Nick Xenophon, but he's a former senator). Per the above discussion, this may have been incompetent editing rather than deliberate hoaxing. Nick-D (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
    • @Nick-D: Ali wrote "According to Australian Immigration Minister Logan Robertson..." but he should've written "According to Australian Immigration Minister, Logan Robertson..." (he missed a comma). Similarly he should have written "then-Senator Nick Xenophon" instead of "Senator Nick Zenfon" (spelling mistake and missed "then"). I agree this is WP:CIR, not malice, and I've left him a note above on proper punctuation usage. I hope he can learn and become a productive contributor.VR _talk 20:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

@Nick-D:, if more information is needed, I will provide it and wait for my request to be considered. Thanks a lot. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

@Nick-D:, I will be grateful if you see my request. Thank you. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 14:40, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

As above, please provide more detail on how you will avoid similar problems in the future. For instance, please explain how you will identify reliable sources and take care with editing to avoid adding inaccuracies to articles. Nick-D (talk) 21:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

@Nick-D:, In a message I wrote at 15:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC) I explained how to identify and find valid sources. In addition to Wikipedia: Reliable sources / Noticeboard I can also use Wikipedia: Reliable sources / Perennial sources to identify a reliable source. . In the same comment, I stated that in the case of Living people, resources should be chosen more carefully. I have also reviewed the contents of Wikipedia: Competence is required and there were some useful points in it. These points included the importance of identifying reliable sources and reading them carefully and the ability to communicate with other editors. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

That looks good to me, and I'm happy to unblock. I'd suggest taking care with your editing, and sticking to major mainstream news websites and books for referencing in the future. Nick-D (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Deprecated source

If you look at this edit of yours you will see a "Tag" that says "Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source". This means you're using a really bad source, so bad that it was WP:deprecated. If you ever see that, I think you should self-revert. This edit was in the sandbox so its ok, but make sure to not move that to an article. In this case the bad source you're using is globaltimes.cn. If you do ctrl+f at WP:RSP you will see it is deprecated.

Please note that just because you don't see the tag doesn't mean the source is reliable. Most unreliable sources will not give you that tag. You should carefully look at WP:RSP for what is not a reliable source.VR _talk 16:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Vice regent:, thank you for mentioning these helpful points in regards to using good/bad sources. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for the topic of Covid-19

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

کمک و راهنمایی

سلام و ادب حس میکنم شما با زبان فارسی آشنایی دارین کمکی میخواستم Ashkeemperator (talk) 01:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Missing signature

FYI, you didn't sign this post. Best regards, Iskandar323 (talk) 06:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Oh, yes, you are right; thanks for mentioning it. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 21:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ali Ahwazi. Thank you for your work on Sayyad-4 (missile). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Seyyed Mohammad Reza Saeedi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seyyed Mohammad Reza Saeedi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyyed Mohammad Reza Saeedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JoseJan89 (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Seyyed Mohammad Saeedi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seyyed Mohammad Saeedi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyyed Mohammad Saeedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JoseJan89 (talk) 09:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Violent crime

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Violent crime, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Your edit to Public opinion on gun control in the United States has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — SamX [talk · contribs] 02:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

@SamX: I appreciate your attention for the mentioned point; Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Suicide in colleges in the United States into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 00:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Dear SamX, thank you for your guidance; I will try to note them more. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 18:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

For instance, I performed an instance based on your guidance, and I hope I have done it well. Actually, I wrote the mentioned necessary sentence(s) in the summary based on what you mentioned. That's this. Thanks for your previous help. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 21:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Looks good, thanks! — SamX [talk · contribs] 23:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 attacks on Palestinians evacuating Gaza City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PRCS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Addition of reference to Fandom wiki in Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades

Thank you for contributing to the article Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades (diff). However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Orgullomoore (talk) 20:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Well, I thank you for mentioning it, and hopefully, I'll pay more attention to it. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

That would be great. --Orgullomoore (talk) 20:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Same problem here at Al-Quds Brigade. I'm thinking there are many more instances of this in your edits. Am I right? --Orgullomoore (talk) 20:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Same issue here. --Orgullomoore (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure about that, but it might be so, too. Anyway, I'll pay more attention to it. Thanks for your attention about it. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diplomatic impact of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honduran.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Ali Ahwazi!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration case request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello Ali Ahwazi,

The Arbitration Committee has decided to procedurally remove the case request Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? as invalid. Details can be found at the bottom of Special:Permalink/1214583983 § Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia?: Case request removed.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration case request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, 182Line (talk) 08:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Friendly fire during the Israel–Hamas war into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 01:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Greetings to you. Oh, yeah, you are right; you mentioned profit matters. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ali Ahwazi. Thank you for your work on Talaiyeh (missile). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It's a start. Needs more and clearer prose content. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

You have added multiple named references to the article Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2024, but they were never defined with a full citation, according to the articles history. Here are just three examples, out of many - Diff 1, Diff 2, Diff 3 — cite error 1, cite error 2, cite error 3. Please add full citations to the named references you have added to the aforementioned article. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 21:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate you for telling the mentioned point; I'll pay more attention to it. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 10:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

On the Timeline of the Israel–Hamas war (12 January 2024 – 6 May 2024) page, you made 5 edits between 12 June and 13 June. I have reverted one of them for duplicate content, see full reasoning here, and will note that 2 more of these need to reverted as well due to the following reasons:

• edit 1 needs to be reverted due to incorrect dates:
  • al-Shifa Hospital was sieged Mid-November and had a second "siege" March 18 - April 1 (sources disagree on whether this second Al-Shifa operation was a siege or a multi-day raid), see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shifa_Hospital_siege#March_2024_siege
  • al-Amal was sieged at least before February 5th, see https://theintercept.com/2024/02/08/gaza-hospital-seige-red-crescent/
  • and Nasser Hospitals siege on January 26th, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasser_Hospital_siege
  • Instead, I encourage you to list these as individual events underneath their starting dates or ending dates. Please research these start dates and cite them appropriately.
• edit 2 needs to be reverted due to it being a duplicated event in wrong location. Flour massacre occured on Feb 29, not Jan 29.

Per the WP:1RR policy listed as a notice on the edit pane, no more than 1 revert can be made in a 24 hour period. There are exceptions including:

"Considerable leeway is also given to editors reverting to maintain the quality of a featured article while it appears on the Main Page."

Although this is not a featured article, a link to it does appear on the main page. This quote implies that the significance of an article appearing on the main page raises the need for potential reverts. As such I will revert your recent edits due to incorrect dates and duplicated information in wrong location. Relspas (talk) 17:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate you for paying attention to the mentioned point. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your edit to Mentally ill people in United States jails and prisons has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

I thank you for mentioning it; I hope to take more care to it. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Categorization

When adding categories to articles please keep WP:CATPOV in mind; Categorizations should generally be uncontroversial; if the category's topic is likely to spark controversy, then a list article (which can be annotated and referenced) is probably more appropriate.

For example, if something cannot be stated in Wikivoice (for example, if we cannot call a politician a criminal in Wikivoice) then we cannot categorize them as a criminal. BilledMammal (talk) 23:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for paying attention to this matter. Good luck.Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Your addition to Opium in Iran has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases, especially if they are not attributed to their source, may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

CCI Notice

Hello, Ali Ahwazi. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Categorization

I noticed that you have been adding categories to several articles related to Iranian military UAVs. Many of the categories you have added are parent categories of of the subcategories already present in the articles (for example, Category:Unmanned military aircraft of Iran is a subcategory of Category:Unmanned military aircraft (via Category:Unmanned military aircraft by country), which itself is a subcategory of Category:Unmanned aerial vehicles. Per WP:PARENTCAT, "an article should be categorised under the most specific branch in the category tree possible, without duplication in parent categories above it." This is primarily to avoid overcategorization. - ZLEA _T\^C 08:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

First, thank you for mentioning it; Second, I hope to pay more attention to this point. Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 09:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 17:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. Honestly, it is very important for me to comply with copyright law; In the middle of doing numerous edits, this mistake happened inadvertently, and I am sorry for this. I have thought about the importance of keeping Wikipedia free from copyright violations and so will pay more attention to this matter. On the other hand, after I noticed warning about “unattributed copying within Wikipdia”:, I tried to use the following code (in edit summary) based on Wikipedia’s rules, i.e.: copied content from page name; see that page's history for attribution Or by reading more regarding copyright policies, I found that using “materials that infringe the copyrights of others" "could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia.”; This is certainly not I am following. Again, this it is important for me to abide by the rules of the project. So, I request you to give me another opportunity please so that I can do more edits. Best regards. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 10:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note additionally we probably need to wait until the copyright investigation at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20240708 is concluded. This is a significantly large investigation. --Yamla (talk) 11:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. I was asked to answer these 5 questions, then I answered them as follows. (Meanwhile, you can read my request reasons in here [4]) What is copyright? In short, copyright is considered a right that is given to the holder/maker of a creative-work in order to prevent other individuals from taking copy of it. On the other hand, a creative-work can be consisted of a book, a phrase, a picture, and so on. Additionally, buildings built on/after 1, 12, 1990 can be eligible for the purpose of copyright (of course in the United States). How is Wikipedia licenced? A license actually can act like a contract; it allows to copy a work solely in accordance with the terms set by the copyright holder or in cases where other exceptions to copyright law are applicable. In fact, Wikipedia's contents are copyrighted in an automatic form, (and are under the Berne Convention); it is also licensed in a formal form to the public under one/several free licenses. The majority of the texts/images of Wikipedia are considered to be co-licensed under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and GFDL (unversioned, without any front-cover contents, invariant sections, or even back-cover contents) … and so on. Actually, we can say that Wikipedia articles are all free content and their texts are covered by the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and in most cases the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Having copyrighted content on Wikipedia without permission leads to the violation of others rights and it is against law. On the other hand, having free content on Wikipedia facilitates the use of contents by readers around the world. This is a free encylopedia. Wikipedia typically requires permission in order to utilize copyrighted materials. In short, Because Wikipedia intend to protect the right of the copyright holder/maker of a creative-work, in order to prevent others from copying it. Creative works are protected by copyright under international agreement, unless they are in the public domain or the copyright is explicitly disclaimed. In most cases, Wikipedia requires permission in order to utilize copyrighted materials. Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? In some cases we can have fair use. Fair use is considered a principle which is based on the legislations (of the U.S.A) that gives the permission for the restricted utilization of the copyright content; and on the other hand, it doesn’t need to get authorization from the owner of copyright. Fair use is as a limitation to copyright laws which aims to make a balance between the rights of copyright holders and the public's interest in having access and usage of copyrighted content. It provides a defense against copyright infringement claims for specific limited uses that would otherwise be considered as violation." The right of fair use can be named as a broad exemption which is applicable to various uses of all forms of creative works. Typically, the fair use doctrine in the United States is more expansive compared to the fair dealing rights found in many countries across the world that are following English Common Law. In the U.S.A. the fair use right or/and fair use exception are considered to be in accordance with a flexible proportionality test that in fact evaluates the use goal, the amount used, and also the impact on the original work market. How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? If we are going to apply a copyrighted text/content, at the first step, we have to make sure to rephrase/reword the mentioned text so the degree of similarity is decreased to the point that our text or content could be taken as a new work. Of note, In cases we want to utilize a material which is free, I have to credit the copyright owner or holder, and also the source (the mentioned matter is depended upon the license as I figured it out). On the other hand, it should be noted that, in cases we intend to apply a photo, it ought to be released under an accepted license in Wikimedia projects such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licenses that in fact match with the restrictions/limitations in the project. At the time that we have a doubt(s) (in all cases), it is good to ask for helping from related admins or even update ourselves by going to related pages. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 09:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't believe that it's in Wikipedia's best interest to unblock you while other editors have to spend their volunteer time extensively reviewing your edits at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20240708. I understand that it's frustrating to hear and it is hard to tell editors who want to edit that they can't, but copyright is a really big deal and being the subject of a current, massive CCI is pretty much an automatic decline for me. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ponyo: Best greetings; Firstly, thanks for your attention and time. Secondly, I'm so sad about being blocked, and I am even more upset to see my contributions caused troubles. I did not really intend to do so. I'm very interested in enhancing the projects status and I really wish to have the chance of doing so. Considering that I figured out my mistake, responded to the questions, could I ask you to give me the last chance to be active in the project. I'll do my best regarding the mentioned copyright warnings. Thank you so much. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali Ahwazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Best greetings; considering that I figured out my mistake and also tried to respond to the asked questions, I like to ask for having another chance to be active in the project. I will do my best regarding the mentioned copyright warnings. That said, I respect the opinion of the previous administrator, but I still believe that I can be effective in improving the level of Wikipedia encyclopedia and I need another opportunity to show this. Thanks a lot. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 13:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your prior unblock request contains errors concerning copyright policy, and significant chunks of it appear to be copied from sources without fully understanding them. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)