User talk:Andrew Powell

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Andrew Powell: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

The Threepenny Opera

Please discuss any changes you want to make on the talk page first. I made most of my edits to correct innaccuracies and gramatical errors that resulted from your edits. Thanks. -- Cielomobile ^{talk / contribs} 05:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 05:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AMA REQUEST

I have opened your AMA case at Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/Andrew Powell. Just to make sure, is the dispute still active?--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 21:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think that discussing the changes we made on Talk:The Threepenny Opera would be the best course of action for Andrew and me. I may very well have made some mistakes in my edits; let's try to discuss it all. The first step in dispute resolution is always trying to come to a conclusion on the talk page. -- Cielomobile ^{talk / contribs} 02:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Semele

A few clarifications. When a full encyclopedia article can be written on individual separate topics, it is common practice for those topics to have separate articles. In this case, it would be common practice for separate operas/oratorios, whose only relation to each other is that they have the same name, to have different articles.

Secondly, I don't think any of your excellent work was lost, just moved around a bit. It's still equally valid regardless of where it is.

Thirdly, Handel's Semele was originally composed to be performed as an oratorio and is listed in most major works of reference as an oratorio, though it is certainly often performed as an opera. The case of whether it should even be performed in this way - as an opera - is certainly a very live debate: under those circumstances it is also common practice to respect the composer's original intentions are regards the performance of the work.

Fourthly, in cases where there are multiple operas by different composers with the same name of roughly the same fame, common practice again is to title either one or both with the name of the operas followed by the name of the composer in brackets. Does this address some of your concerns? Best, Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 13:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moreschi, your phrase "originally composed to be performed as an oratorio" is bogus: you are building in your own conclusion. Semele is an opera. It is composed that way, as is evident from its score and libretto. Yes, it was performed at first as an oratorio, and we know why. Your "most major works of reference" fed on their own misinformation in the early part of the 20th Century, when Handel scholarship was minimal. Andrew Powell (talk) 10:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Eisenberg

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Philip Eisenberg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Kleinzach 23:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kleinzach's comments related to this prompter, and to prompting in general, imply that prompting is akin to backstage carpentry. Someone should talk to some opera singers -- say, Plácido Domingo or Renée Fleming, who are among the 100's of stars who have worked closely with Eisenberg -- to grasp what prompters do. Is Wikipedia to simply "skip" this topic? Andrew Powell (talk) 09:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Philip Eisenberg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Philip Eisenberg, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Eisenberg. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Japan Philharmonic

A tag has been placed on Japan Philharmonic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a little stupid. We are talking about an orchestra with an annual budget of 1 billion yen. Andrew Powell (talk) 09:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There now a proper article on this orchestra at Japan Philharmonic Orchestra (created in April 2009). See my comments on Ottavio Dantone in the section below about the minimum requirements for an article and how to avoid deletion. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 11:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Ottavio Dantone"

A page you created, Ottavio Dantone, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. CalumH93 (talk) 09:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was never meant to be complete. Just a start. How are people supposed to contibute to a page that has been deleted? I don't have all the facts on this artist, but I do know that he is "established" and active; other contributors will know more. Andrew Powell (talk) 09:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrew. I've just 'rescued' this article. The problem is, even a stub article needs to indicate the subject's significance and provide a least one reference to support this. In the case of biographies of living people, an unreferenced article is subject to immediate deletion. If you create articles as just unformatted sketchy notes without any references, they'll often not survive long enough to be expanded or improved by anyone else. When creating an article from scratch, it's best to get it into some reasonable shape, even if it's only a stub, on one of your user pages. If you click on User:Andrew Powell/Sandbox and save the page, you can use it to draft articles before publishing them. Unlike the main Wikipedia sandbox, which is emptied every few hours, that page will belong to you and not be emptied or edited by anyone else. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 10:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:TeatroRossiniPesaro1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:TeatroRossiniPesaro1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. fetchcomms☛ 15:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:TeatroRossiniLugo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:TeatroRossiniLugo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. fetchcomms☛ 15:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:TeatroRossiniPesaro2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:TeatroRossiniPesaro2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. fetchcomms☛ 15:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:C&C on Harmonia Mundi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:C&C on Harmonia Mundi.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:C&C on Serenissima.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:C&C on Serenissima.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Façade du premier théâtre de l'Odéon (1782).PNG

The file File:Façade du premier théâtre de l'Odéon (1782).PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]