User talk:Bazuz

Welcome!

Hello, Bazuz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who put a certain post on a talk page. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! —Ute in DC (talk) 07:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are the four general rules at Wikipedia?

The four general rules are to respect your fellow Wikipedians, remain neutral, cite your sources, and to ignore a rule if it prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia.

How do I edit a page?

Click 'Edit this page' or 'Edit' on the top of the page that you want to edit.
Make your changes in the edit window.
Preview your changes by clicking the 'Show preview' button.
Click the 'Save page' button.

See Wikipedia:How to edit a page for more detailed information.

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

Please use the Article Wizard to create one, then add references to the article as explained below.

What are references, sources, and citations all about?

All claims must be supported by a book, website, or news organization independent of the subject of the article. The source must be reliable, meaning it cannot be a blog, MySpace page, or personal website. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to prove that an inaccurate statement is true, and that it should stay in the article. The policy regarding this states that the statement has to be verifiable, not necessarily true. See Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information.

How do I insert a reference into an article?

For inline references:

Do a search on Ask.com, Google, or your preferred search engine for the subject of the article that you want to put a reference in.
Click 'Edit this page' or 'Edit' in the Wikipedia article, and insert a claim into that article stating a fact about the subject. Don't click the save button just yet.
In the search you did in step 1, find a website that supports the claim you made in step 2. Highlight the address in the address bar (where it says http://www.some-website.com/some-page.htm).
Go to the reference generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out the as many fields as you can. Then click 'Get reference wiki text'.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text.
In the article, after the claim you made in step 2, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied in step 5.
If the article does not have a References, Footnotes, Notes, or Bibliography section, then add this below the See Also section and above the External Links section:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

For references put at the end of an article:

Do a search on Ask.com, Google, or your preferred search engine for the subject of the article that you want to put a reference in.
In the search, find a website that supports the claims made in the article. Highlight the address in the address bar (where it says http://www.some-website.com/some-page.htm).
Go to the reference generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out the as many fields as you can. Then click 'Get reference wiki text'.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text.
Go to the Wikipedia article. If the article does not have a References, Footnotes, Notes, or Bibliography section, then add this below the See Also section and above the External Links section:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Then, add this after the {{Reflist}}, in a new line:

{{Refbegin}}
*Press paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) after this asterisk, then remove the <ref></ref> tags

{{Refend}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

How do I format text on Wikipedia?

See Wikipedia:Cheatsheet.

Urban Cohorts. If you go to the article about urban cohorts I have discussed the name in discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Gaon (talk • contribs) 20:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jerahmeel

I'm afraid I've had to revert you. I fully believe everything you say, but that's not the point. Wikipedia is not a research journal, it's a record of what other authorities have said. Since the KJV uses Hammelech, we must record that, since it is information that has been widely disseminated, however false you may believe it to be. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 15:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amos Yarkoni

Hi Bazuz -- I think the edits to the Amos Yarkoni article with respect to his coffin being carried by officers of a higher rank lacks context without the additional facts. It's like saying "It was partially cloudy on the day of the funeral".

The sentence as originally cited provided the facts (his coffin was carried by officers of a higher rank) and provided the context (having the coffin carried by soldiers of a higher rank is against military tradition, and was done as a mark of respect), but is devoid of emotive language ("poignant"). Let me know what you think -- I'd like to change it back to that sentence, so that it conveys the facts surrounding his cortege.

Cheers, AWN2 (talk) 05:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AWN2, Sure, go ahead. I think I messed up something back then and it's good that you came back to fix it :) Bazuz (talk) 05:56, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problems -- will do it now :) Thanks for getting back to me! AWN2 (talk) 01:19, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dorimachus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dorimachus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Quiggers1P (talk) 20:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fall of the Western Roman Empire

Thanks for your attention. I look forward to any comments you may find time to make on User talk:Richard Keatinge/Fall of the Western Roman Empire - on my talk page is probably best. Richard Keatinge (talk) 09:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It may not be finished but I hope it's ready for mainspace and all that that implies. I will continue to work on it but would very much appreciate your comments. Richard Keatinge (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Yarin Hassan

The article of Israeli player of Maccabi Netanya F.C. Yarin Hassan was deleted because he "has not played in a fully pro league". I want to make return this article. If you can help me I will be grateful. Thanks in advance.

Bugfsyenjoygfgh (talk) 02:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Have your tried contacting the administrator who deleted the article, one user:Explicit? This seems like a honest mistake. Bazuz (talk) 10:31, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bazuz,

Thanks for your advice. I contacted the administrator who deleted the article and the article is up again.

Bugfsyenjoygfgh (talk) 00:38, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to have been of assistance! Bazuz (talk) 01:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Nuevo Laredo massacres

Hey, thanks for the clean-up in the 2012 Nuevo Laredo massacres! I just wanted to know exactly what is your reasoning behind this removal.[1] If you ask me, experts' analysis on the Sinaloa cartel incursions are usually beneficial, since it is impossible to understand the criminal underworld and we can only interprete what happens before our eyes. Best, ComputerJA (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I thought those specific analyses were not contributing anything material in the form they were written. They were just tossing around speculations. I may be wrong about this, of course.

Incidentally, I think the whole article needs some change of perspective. While the cartels are sadly a fact on he ground, I do not think the wikipedia needs to record their history in such meticulous detail - the overall contours yes, but the precise detailing of which crimial subgang slightered which rival, when and how, can be left to police reports or very specialized books.

What do you think?

Bazuz (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it really depends on how the speculation is written. Wikipedia has a strict guideline for speculations (see: WP:SPECULATION), and only predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included. And in this case, we MAY allow for the two speculations in the article to be left, but I don't know. It works both ways.

As for the detailed writing... I guess that's just me being all ref-ninja and meticulous :p That's my style. If something I deem important is missing, I always make sure to write it. I don't know what to say about that, LOL. What about you? ComputerJA (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fall of the Western Roman Empire

On 11 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fall of the Western Roman Empire, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 405, during the fall of the Western Roman Empire, manpower was so scarce that Roman soldiers were urged to allow their personal slaves to fight beside them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fall of the Western Roman Empire. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. When you recently edited Wolverhampton Riot, 1835, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Whig and ?? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SMoS: Schellenberg's niece

Reference added. Thanks for the attention, I probably thought the one in the end of the section covered it. Bahavd Gita (talk) 10:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

generalissimus vs. commander-in-chief

The lead section had this recent addition: "(though with power not delegated from outside the military power structure, as commander-in-chief often is; i.e., an elected official)[citation needed]. " (by 22:15, 22 February 2011 124.197.206.98) I deleted this as it's not very clear. However, 124.197.206.98 did raise an interesting question: what is the difference between the two terms? Bazuz (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Commander in Chief is the generic name for a head of the armed forces most commonly associated with a head of state. It is a position or appointment and does not infer a nor carry the substantive title or insignia of a specific military rank. Much in the same way a Chief of Staff as an appointment can and has been held by different substantive grades of general. Dainamo (talk) 14:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lightsaber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template at Fall of the Western Roman Empire

I'd appreciate your opinion on the template at the top of this article, on which you have done quite extensive work. [diff] describes the work that has been done since the template was put on. I wonder, in your opinion, is it now reasonable to remove the template? Richard Keatinge (talk) 08:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hecatomnus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orontes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bazuz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bazuz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Nadia Samdani

An article that you have been involved in editing—Nadia Samdani—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 04:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bazuz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A note without a reference in prose

Hi there,

In 2011 you made an edit to Ostracism which added a note, but there's no reference to it in the prose (body) of the article (diff). I'm not sure if you'll remember now, but do you know where you intended to put a reference to this note in the prose? I was fixing the complicated wikitext of the first note and couldn't find where the other was referenced before realising it didn't exist.

Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]