User talk:C.Suthorn

IP Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

C.Suthorn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. This IP belongs to hotsplots, a service that allows access to the internet via wifi in trains in Germany. It is not possible to have access to it from outside of Deutsche Bahn operations and only accessible to paying customers of Deutsche Bahn. C.Suthorn (talk) 13:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I was today given the IPs 176.74.57.xxx (176.74.56.0/21, ASN 2529, SysEleven GmbH) and 46.183.103.xx (46.183.96.0/21, ASN 34953, RelAix Networks GmbH) --C.Suthorn (talk) 05:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

176.74.56.0/21 is not blocked. The other range is, though. It's blocked because it is a colocation webhost. I've verified this is indeed a data centre rather than an ISP. If you are forced to use that, you may claim exceptional circumstances and apply for WP:IPBE. I hope this is helpful. --Yamla (talk) 13:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex marriage in Germany

I don't see any good reason to have so many pictures in the article. BTW: I did one revert. Two made by IP's are not mine. Ron 1987 (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you think three is to many, then discuss it. There are talk pages. Even if three were to many: You deleted all. Ehe für alle was the dominant topic in Germany and played a big role in the general election. All TV, radio, newspaper and internet media reported on the issue, all had images of the ceremony in Goldener Saal. Ehe für alle was a very prominent slogan, Demo für alle was a reaction to it.
Your edit comment was "needles", first IP said "*needless", second IP said "needless". If this had been different people than you, they would have used another comment, that is not so very strange. Especially IP users, who want their edits to stay, use good comments, because they cannot (unlike regular users) rely on a reputation supported by their edit history.

--C.Suthorn (talk) 15:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Blasey Ford

Please post your rationale for including that image or it will be removed. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 18:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, C.Suthorn. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 19:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC) --Animalparty! (talk) 19:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]