User talk:Chafe66

Welcome!

Hello, Chafe66, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially those to the Robert M. Pirsig article. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Dennis Bratland (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

New comments go on the bottom of talk pages. See WP:TALK. I moved your new thread and replied at Talk:Robert M. Pirsig#Background.... --Dennis Bratland (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okey doke...Chafe66 (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simultaneity

Hi Chafe66! I apologize for being so critical on simultaneity. My comments are directed at DVdm, in the hope that he'll becomes less possessive of that page. There is much more to the topic than the math of physics. Anything said in English is either philosophy, religion, or something else, but it isn't the math of physics. BlueMist (talk) 00:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BlueMist--no harm no foul. I figure if I can't answer properly motivated criticism, I oughtn't get on a wiki page and sound off. Wasn't clear to me you were criticizing my points; my impression was just (as I've just written) that we're talking about different things. RE: Dvdm, he actually seemed receptive to my point right off the bat, which was critical of the example in the article, so I haven't encountered yet that phenomenon. Perhaps I should read the history of the page some more...Chafe66 (talk) 07:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fuck, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fuck, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for taking my revert kindly and even thanking me for it. ◄ Sebastian 18:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation

I saw the change you made on Rickrolling and peaking at your latest, saw a similar change at Judy Garland, so I want to point out that WP has defaulted to logical quotations - punctuation goes outside of any quote marks unless that punctuation was originally part of the quoted text. --Masem (t) 00:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Dream of Jeannie plot rewrites

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List_of_I_Dream_of_Jeannie_episodes. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop leaving messages on my talk page as if you're an auto-generated message sender or some kind of admin. It's really annoying--and you leave it unsigned as if to make it anonymous. You're also copy/pasting a message that applies to yourself. Shall I paste the message on your talk page as well? This is silly Chafe66 (talk) 07:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (List of I Dream of Jeannie episodes) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]