User talk:Emiya Mulzomdao

Copyright infringement

I can see that you are a new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Fighter's History (video game). I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see the problem. I'll get onto it. --Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Natsume split

When splitting the article Natsume Atari, you seem to have accidentally done it backwards. Splitting off Natsume Inc. preserves none of the former page history. Furthermore, consensus was that the page remain at Natsume (company), not Natsume Inc..

As an example, Square (video game company) is still where it was originally after it was made in 2001, and Square Enix was made later in 2003. The proper methodology here would have simply been to create a new Natsume Atari page, leaving the older one in the same place. I suggest to reverse the move at WP:RM#T and change Natsume Inc. back to the redirect it was, then make a new page for Natsume Atari. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't quite get what you're saying because the issues with Natsume (company) aren't quite comparable to Square (video game company) for numerous factors.

The biggest issue with Natsume (company) was that, as its previous version of page describes them (exerpt from [05:46, 30 April 2023‎]: "Natsume (Japanese: ナツメ) is the name of two video game publishers, Natsume-Atari and Natsume Inc., that were once the same company but are now completely separated."), this page has been containing information about two company even though they've been two completely different video game develoepers since at least 1995. For some reason, editors in the past never corrected this, which means the page history of Natsume (company) has accumlated edits about both company with no way to separate them now. Your suggestion sounds like Natsume Inc. is the one that should inherit the page history from Natsume (company) and the page Natsume Atari should start anew, but this doesn't sound right because Natsume Inc. was established as the US division of Natsume Co., Ltd/Natsume Atari before the former went independent. I think Natsume Atari is the one that should keep the history because it is the "original" one of the two.
Another reason I find the comparison to Square (video game company) not appropriate is because the situations around company are different. Square as an independent developer ceased to exist when it was merged with Enix to become Square Enix. It makes sense there are two separate pages about Square (video game company) and Square Enix because they cover different eras of the history (Square: 1986–2003; Square Enix: 2003–present). On the other hand, Natsume Co., Ltd never went away like it. It was founded in 1987 and still operates the business today. It changed its name to "Natsume Atari" in 2013, but Atari (unrelated to the American company of the same name) was Natsume's pachislot subsidiary, so it wasn't a merger between two separate corporations like Square and Enix. This is why I moved Natsume (company) to Natsume Atari because they're the same company.

Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fair, I didn't check indepth enough to see that Natsume Co. and Natsume Inc. were separate companies. This makes sense, then. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Natsume Inc.

I've marked that article as reviewed. Thanks for splitting those two pages. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 00:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

now hold on a minute

mostly a matter of curiosity so i don't plunge myself into a rabbit hole alone

about this edit on presumably former tommy tallarico studios ceo tommy tallarico, and the accompanying edit on tomorrow never dies, who even is this todd dennis? i went and looked around, and found nothing on. the credits i found seem to list sonic "david alexander" mayhem and howard ulyate as composers (mostly howard), and daryl kimoto, john botti, david whittaker, bill lusty, and a mysterious individual going by the name "joey kuras" as the people in charge of all the other sounds, but i found nothing on todd working on it specfically

did find a credit in the 3do port of wolfenstein 3d though, so at least he's real

is he in the credits of the game but just never mentioned anywhere else as having worked on it? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 11:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Dennis is listed as the composer in the booklet of official soundtrack, Tomorrow Never Dies (Video Game Original Soundtrack). Here's a photo of said booklet. Todd Dennis is credited on many other games that involved Tommy Tallarico Studios, famously Black Dawn whose music was recycled in Sonic and the Black Knight, so this information checks out. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh, thanks

not sure why he's not mentioned elsewhere, when even joey is cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This game appears to lack end credits and only has them in the manual. Even there, the music is credited to Tommy Tallarico Studios with no specific composer names. They're only listed in the official soundtrack and it seems like nobody bothered to check. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 14:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your view would be appreciated here

Talk:List of marines and naval infantry forces#Suggest renaming this article What do you think? Dreddmoto (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with the topic enough to provide opinion. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 02:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Street Fighter: The Movie (console video game)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Street Fighter: The Movie (console video game), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Cha Eun-woo § Listing of "model" as a profession

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cha Eun-woo § Listing of "model" as a profession. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source

Thank you for noticing and removing the use of the 'Niche Gamer' unreliable source on Chiitan. When I in-lined all the citations on that article yesterday I didn't realize that site was listed as such. There were some more instances of it on the page, I deleted the rest. –Erakura^(talk) 13:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I missed the other citations and it's good you caught and fixed them. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 12:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit/vandalism was reverted

1. You claimed FemiWiki is an open-wiki, thus is against WP:UGC.

Re 1: This is a false claim. FemiWiki is not an open-wiki.

2. You claimed the article linked is an original thought, thus is against WP:NOR.

Re 2. This is a false claim. This is a primary source (made by the creators of 4B themselves) and is allowed via WP:PRIMARY.

From point 1 of WP:PRIMARY: "Primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them". The FemiWiki source has been reputably published by various academic and peer-reviewed journals. 5 of the existing 32 sources from the 4B Wikipedia page refer to this FemiWiki source, but here is another academic journal that verified and refers to FemiWiki: 6B4T in China: a case of Inter-Asian feminist knowledge negotiation and contestation through translation.

3. You claimed that "the claim does not line up at all with what's in this source"

Re 3. There was never a claim made. Only a copy+paste directly from the source was done. This is allowed by point 3 of WP:PRIMARY. Given that your meta-claim (your claim about how the FemiWiki source was used) was verifiably and grossly wrong, I have reason to believe your edit was not made in good faith and is therefore an instance of WP:VANDAL.

Please fully read and understand the Wikipedia policies (not just selectively read and stop reading whenever you get the bits of policies that you were looking for) so that you don't incorrectly label a source as being against some policy.

Please learn more about 4B if you want to continue contributing to the 4B page. 99.159.19.180 (talk) 18:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources still have to be reliable and Femwiki isn't a reliable source. You claim it isn't user generated content, then I assume you can provide the credentials of Leaf1234 who recently edited the article there. Have they been independently published by another reliable source that considers them a subject matter expert, as per WP:SPS?

I'll warn you again that falsely accusing other editors of vandalism is considered against WP:NPA. Read WP:NOTVANDALISM and stop. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 18:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good but

Re this. All good, you are correct and it is great you explain this in a detailed edit summary, but don't mark edits like this as minor. Just a heads up. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep this in mind next time. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 07:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Marc Benioff, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CelebrityNetWorth is NOT a reliable source as per WP:RSP - Arjayay (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay: I didn't add that. I actually cleaned up the other unrelated wiki link because of WP:UGC. I don't know why the history page appears like that, but it wasn't me that added CelebrityNetWorth. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 13:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that as part of your revert you reinstated part of an earlier edit that included it - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 14:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested topic area