User talk:Harrias/Archive 26
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Harrias. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | → | Archive 30 |
Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Helston Castle
On 3 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Helston Castle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a bowling green and a monument now occupy the site of Helston Castle in Cornwall? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Helston Castle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Helston Castle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Khaya Majola (cricketer)
Hello! Your submission of Khaya Majola (cricketer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kosack (talk) 20:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Reading
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Reading you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
|
The WikiChevrons | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the WikiChevrons for participating in 18 reviews between October and December 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 11 January 2020 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Siege of Reading
The article Siege of Reading you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Siege of Reading for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 10:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
In appreciation
|
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar | |
| By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the exceptionally detailed and thorough reviews which you have given to so many articles, resulting in profound improvements in their quality. I am specifically thinking of Battle of Pontvallain where you went considerably above and beyond the call of reviewerhood, but also of the many others which have felt your insightful and improving touch. Ideally I would be able to say "thank you" with a beer; as it is, all I can give you is this barnstar. Thank you. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC) |
DYK for Khaya Majola (cricketer)
On 23 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Khaya Majola (cricketer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that cricketer Khaya Majola rejected offers to play alongside white players and overseas because he believed that black Africans were "being used as stooges" to benefit white South Africans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Khaya Majola (cricketer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Khaya Majola (cricketer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Hull (1642)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Hull (1642) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Leeds
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Leeds you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Siege of Hull (1642)
Hello! Your submission of Siege of Hull (1642) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ealdgyth - Talk 17:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Hull (1642)
The article Siege of Hull (1642) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Hull (1642) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 19:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Harrias, the nominator has posted that the issues you raised in your review have been addressed. Can you please return at your earliest convenience to see whether what they've done satisfies you, and if there's anything more that needs doing? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the great work you've done on this article. As a boy growing up in Yeovil I had often come across references to this, and was interested to learn more, but that wasn't so easy pre-Wikipedia. The article has given me a really clear overview for the first time. Just thought you might like to know that your efforts are really appreciated. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Siege of Hull (1642)
On 2 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Hull (1642), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Siege of Hull took place in 1642 after the governor twice refused to admit King Charles I to the town? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siege of Hull (1642). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Siege of Hull (1642)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thank you for your hard work on the English Civil War! Hope you can make it a Good Article topic!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC) |
- Thanks Dr. Blofeld. Getting the whole thing to a GA topic might be a slightly overambitious target, but it's certainly a target to work towards! I think there are a few smaller topics that might be achievable within it - and who knows... Harrias talk 11:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brian Close, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Higher School Certificate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Leeds
The article Battle of Leeds you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Leeds for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Dorothy Olsen?
Hi. Could I get a status update on Talk:Dorothy Olsen/GA1? Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Sir Thomas Byron
On 17 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sir Thomas Byron, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sir Thomas Byron (pictured) was killed during the First English Civil War by one of his own soldiers over a pay dispute? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sir Thomas Byron. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sir Thomas Byron), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Storming of Farnham Castle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Storming of Farnham Castle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 21:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Storming of Farnham Castle
The article Storming of Farnham Castle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Storming of Farnham Castle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020 Military History Writers' Contest
|
The Writer's Barnstar | |
| For placing second in the WikiProject Military history monthly article writing contest for February 2020, with 34 points from eight articles, I hereby award you the Writer's Barnstar on behalf of the project. Good work! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final
The article 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final
The article 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
WikiCup 2020 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.- The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included L293D,
Kingsif, 
Enwebb, 
Lee Vilenski and 
CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.
.svg){kind=small}
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Storming of Farnham Castle
On 29 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Storming of Farnham Castle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Storming of Farnham Castle, the Royalist defence was so minimal that one contemporary claimed they "deserved not the name of a garrison"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Storming of Farnham Castle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Storming of Farnham Castle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (talk) 01:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC) (Belatedly posted by BlueMoonset (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC))
WikiCup newsletter correction
There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Women's T20 World Cup
Thanks for the Barnstar. I'm assuming you were alerted to my photos by the one I added to the article about Lizelle Lee. I attended all five of the matches at the WACA Ground, and photographed all nine of the participating teams. At this stage, I'm still working on only the third team, but the rest will follow, including at least one photo of Anya Shrubsole ... Bahnfrend (talk) 08:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
|
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar | |
| For your diligence, consistency, and going above and beyond when reviewing many articles at GAN, MILHIST ACR, and FAC. It is greatly appreciated! buidhe 18:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash
The article 1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 21:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash
The article 1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:1983 British Airways Sikorsky S-61 crash for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 22:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Siege of Wardour Castle
Hello! Your submission of Siege of Wardour Castle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
John Manners obituary
Many thanks for sending that over to me, much appreciated :) StickyWicket (talk) 15:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
no-ball / No ball
I see in a recent GA review that, in response to: Our article tends to hyphenate "no-ball"...
you said that I don't know why, the Laws of Cricket don't. We should probably sort that out.
It is in WP:CRIC#STYLE as "no-ball" following a discussion just over 2 years ago, which decided that common usage over-rode what was in the Laws. I started that discussion in an attempt to standardise things rather than because of a firmly held conviction either way, so happy to raise it again. @The Rambling Man: in case you are interested. Spike 'em (talk) 12:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Spike 'em: Cheers. I did find that discussion a bit later, when I was considering "sorting that out". I'm not hugely fussed either way; I prefer "no ball", but if that was the consensus, then that's fine. Harrias talk 12:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of 1968 European Cup Final
Hello! Your submission of 1968 European Cup Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HaEr48 (talk) 01:48, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C.
The article Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C. for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final
The article 1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Brian Close
As I've got a little unexpected time on my hands over the next week or two (!), I could probably help out a little with Closey if you are still interested. I just had a look and I'd imagine that Hill's book is going to form the spine of it. I don't have access to that, but I've got just about everything else that would be useful from a Yorkshire viewpoint. The main parts that I think I would be useful for would be his debut and early seasons, his captaincy in the 1960s, and bits and pieces on his sacking. Plus, I always remember when Darren Gough made his England debut, he made the password for the dressing room "Brian Close" but I can't remember where I saw that! So I can certainly chip in. One other thing I was considering doing (if I can summon up the enthusiasm) is giving Geoffrey Boycott an overhaul. User:SGGH did a lot of work on it years ago, but I think it could be improved quite a bit, especially from the Yorkshire side of things. And certainly on some more recent developments. However, I don't have the McKinstry biography and as it's not really my period, I'm loathe to cough up anything to buy it. Plus, I'm a long way from being his biggest fan... Sarastro (talk) 10:10, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Sarastro1: I've got both Hill and his autobiography now. I've just been going through what exists in the article, tidying and sourcing it, and adding more information if I think I have anything interesting. So if you fancy it, just jump straight in to the article and add what you can; we can work on the balance, and tie things together better later; at the moment, it's enough of a mess that getting a bit unbalanced in places temporarily isn't going to do too much damage. Harrias talk 10:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the star!
I do try and review every FLC - I figure I make an awful lot of nominations myself so it's only fair to review others in return :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final
On 27 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final, a domestic cricket match in England, two West Indian players set new batting and bowling records? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1981 Benson & Hedges Cup Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
--valereee (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final
The article 1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:42, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Siege of Wardour Castle
On 30 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Wardour Castle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the first siege of Wardour Castle in 1643, Lady Blanche Arundell held out for a week with just 25 Royalist soldiers against 1,300 Parliamentarian troops? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siege of Wardour Castle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Siege of Wardour Castle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Request for admin intervention
@Harrias: Sorry to bother you, but a user by the name of Koridas is acting like a jerk to those participating in the april fools foolery edit war and acting as if he was a mod with authority, as has attacked others on his own page and the talk page and is also violating WP:CONSENSUS.JustAnotherWikiUser0816 (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
The article 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Wardour Castle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Wardour Castle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Harrias, I am in the middle of this review—and it's looking OK— but there are two sources I am interested to obtaining but cannot get hold of: French (pages 112, 116 and 117); and Goodwin (pages 46, 58, 60 and 61). It's not critical for me to obtain them for the review, but if you could send them to me by email, I would be grateful. Cheers, Amitchell125 (talk) 21:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Amitchell125: Both French and Goodwin were library books; Goodwin I had to return, and French I was reference only, so I couldn't take it out of the library. That said, I took some photos of the pages on my phone for French, so I will sent those over for the relevant pages. Can't do anything about Goodwin I'm afraid. Harrias talk 20:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Some stripes for you!
|
Military history service award | |
| For scoring 124 points in the WikiProject Military history 2020 edit-a-thon March Madness, I am pleased to award you this token of appreciation from the Project. Thank you, and well done. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Siege of Wardour Castle
The article Siege of Wardour Castle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Siege of Wardour Castle for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 15:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final
The article 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2010 Twenty20 Cup Final for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Edward Wickham
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edward Wickham you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C.
The article Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Time for FAC?? The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: There's a few interesting nuggets in here that I'd like to incorporate. (But I'm having to actually work this morning. The horror!) Harrias talk 08:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Me too. But FAC is such a lengthy process, you could start it off now and expect to get some comments in the next two months.... The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 08:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- If you do wish to co-nominate (or even let me nom and co-nom you if you don't think you have the time), let me know. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I'm definitely game for a FAC; I will certainly have time over the coming weeks, but this week we're winding some things down at work, which is bizarrely more work than normal. Feel free to nominate it with me as co-nom if you want to get it going sooner, and I'll just jump in when I'm able. Harrias talk 10:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I've added a few bits and pieces in, let me know what you think. On another note, I think I might regret starting this GA backlog drive; all my articles that I was quite happy to have wait until the next round of the WikiCup are getting reviewed... now I'm going to have to write some more! (Still, I've now officially been furloughed, so in between keeping the kids from bothering Mum too much (she's working from home) I should manage. Harrias talk 21:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I'm definitely game for a FAC; I will certainly have time over the coming weeks, but this week we're winding some things down at work, which is bizarrely more work than normal. Feel free to nominate it with me as co-nom if you want to get it going sooner, and I'll just jump in when I'm able. Harrias talk 10:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: There's a few interesting nuggets in here that I'd like to incorporate. (But I'm having to actually work this morning. The horror!) Harrias talk 08:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
|
|
The WikiChevrons | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the WikiChevrons for participating in 21 reviews between January and March 2020. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final
The article 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2010 Twenty20 Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Edward Wickham
The article Edward Wickham you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edward Wickham for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 21:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
GAN backlog chart
Harrias, because the new chart you created and the table get out of synch as soon as the update is posted, I did my best to create a chart something like the one they use at GOCE that is updated at the same time the table is. I hope it's useful. We will probably need to come up with a way to finesse the dates in another few weeks, but this gives us time.
Did you notice the request on the backlog drive talk page for percentages to be added to the table? (Both percentage change for the most recent day, and percentage change for the drive to date.) Should we expand the table? If so, do we put the percentages at the end, or after the actual number it reflects? One important caution: the "GAN changes" template is also used by GOCE (about four times as many drives as GAN) and other places, so we can't just change it willy-nilly. If we want a new format, we should create a new template. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Thanks. I didn't realise that there was a template that could be used. Although I really should have done; there's a template for everything! I have also made some changes to {{GAN changes}} to allow the optional inclusion of percentages, so that should work fine for us without adding anything others don't want, what do you reckon? Harrias talk 10:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- The changes to {{GAN changes}} look great, and as you say shouldn't affect any of the other pages that use it. (I hadn't thought of adding a new parameter.) I'm glad you think the new chart is workable. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Harrias, I just realized that the percentage numbers appeared to be too large in the table. When I checked, I realized that the denominators in the equations should be 6 and 7 respectively, not 5 for both. I've made the appropriate edits to GAN changes (having first tested them in the sandbox, and starting out in a completely wrong direction before finding what I think is the proper, and much simpler, solution). Please double check me when you get the chance, since I don't really know the template language, though the new percentages I checked look correct now. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- The changes to {{GAN changes}} look great, and as you say shouldn't affect any of the other pages that use it. (I hadn't thought of adding a new parameter.) I'm glad you think the new chart is workable. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Battle of Piercebridge
Hello! Your submission of Battle of Piercebridge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 17:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Christel Boom
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Christel Boom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 13:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Christel Boom
The article Christel Boom you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Christel Boom for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 22:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Christel Boom
The article Christel Boom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Christel Boom for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Australia's 1988 Women's World Cup winning squad.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Australia's 1988 Women's World Cup winning squad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Review of Unsourced BLP
Hey there, I am Raaj Tilak. I want to say that there is an unsourced BLP in wikipedia of name: Praveen Agrawal. This article is extremely unsourced BLP. Please, make a review to that article and delete. Thanks --Raaj Tilak (talk) 15:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Wardour Castle
The article Siege of Wardour Castle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Wardour Castle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Battle of Piercebridge
Hello! Your submission of Battle of Piercebridge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 13:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| My sympathy for the trolling on your FA nom. Such a second-rate reviewer shouldn't be allowed anywhere near FA, but he'll be allowed to fester there, driving away good editors with no benefit to anyone or anything but his own paltry ego. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC) |
DYK for 1968 European Cup Final
On 19 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1968 European Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Manchester United became the first English football team to win the European Cup by defeating Benfica in the 1968 final? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1968 European Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1968 European Cup Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Battle of Piercebridge
On 22 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Piercebridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Royalist victories at the Battles of Piercebridge and Tadcaster five days apart in December 1642 shifted the balance of power in Yorkshire in their favour? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Piercebridge. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Piercebridge), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Battle of Tadcaster
On 22 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Tadcaster, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Royalist victories at the Battles of Piercebridge and Tadcaster five days apart in December 1642 shifted the balance of power in Yorkshire in their favour? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Tadcaster), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
The article 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final
On 23 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Somerset could have won the 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final if they had known the Laws of Cricket? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2010 Twenty20 Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
On 24 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite being the third edition of the tournament, the 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup featured the first final held in the tournament's history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup
On 24 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite being the third edition of the tournament, the 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup featured the first final held in the tournament's history? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
GAN backlog drive graph
Harrias, I've just made adjustments to the X axis that will take us through the end of the drive over a month from now, having finally spent enough time to figure out many ins and outs of the Template:Graph:Chart abilities, including its date functionality.
At some point, we'll probably want to widen the graph somewhat when it starts getting crowded, though we could keep it compact if the software automatically goes from every other day to every third day. But that decision is probably a couple of weeks away.
If there are other things you'd like in the graph, let me know. I didn't think the year was needed, since it's specified in the table below, and "Apr" will match the length of "May". Hope you like the new look. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Cheers, just catching up on a few things, having being mostly off-wiki for the past few days. This looks good; I think we can afford to widen the graph a bit, certainly, but if it still starts to looked cramped, we can look at it then. Thanks for your work on it! Harrias talk 15:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Eddie891 Talk Work 23:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Eddie891: Cheers. Got this, but been a bit all over the place of late. Will aim to get something back to you in the next couple of days, if that's okay? Harrias talk 19:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Quite fine! Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 19:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Worcestershire v Somerset, 1979 scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that Worcestershire v Somerset, 1979 has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 24 May 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 24, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth (talk) 15:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
WikiCup 2020 May newsletter
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
- Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
- Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews- Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
- Lee Vilenski with 869 points,
Hog Farm with 801, Kingsif with 719, 
SounderBruce with 710, Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and 
MX with 515.
The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
The article 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Harrias, I was hoping you could return to your review here now that the nominator has responded. (I hadn't noticed until now that there's a non-standard sig there, which probably means that the ping never went through.) Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Harrias, it's been another week. If you can't return to the nomination, please let me know and I'll be happy to call for a new reviewer to take over. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Thanks for another reminder. Spinning too many plates. Will look at it right now. Harrias talk 16:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1968 European Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1968 European Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matthewishere0 -- Matthewishere0 (talk) 16:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 World Athletics Championships – Women's marathon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 World Athletics Championships – Women's marathon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 World Athletics Championships – Women's marathon
The article 2019 World Athletics Championships – Women's marathon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 World Athletics Championships – Women's marathon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1991 European Super Cup
The article 1991 European Super Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1991 European Super Cup for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HawkAussie -- HawkAussie (talk) 13:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1993 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
The article 1993 Women's Cricket World Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1993 Women's Cricket World Cup Final for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1993 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1993 Women's Cricket World Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1991 European Super Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1991 European Super Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HawkAussie -- HawkAussie (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
On 7 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final, held at the 90,000-capacity Melbourne Cricket Ground, had an attendance of 3,326? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1993 Women's Cricket World Cup Final
The article 1993 Women's Cricket World Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1993 Women's Cricket World Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 17:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Changes made to the Sieges of Taunton
Today you undid changes that I made to the Sieges of Taunton.
Did you not like that I changed the Infobox to show the dates of the three separate sieges...or that I moved fully listed sources from the Reference section to the Bibliography section? If the former, I understand and will respect your opinion as the primary author of the article. I made the change only because I thought that showing the three separate date ranges better matched the manner in which you showed the commanders.
If the latter, I don't understand. WP:CITEVAR says that "Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference..." I wasn't trying to change the manner in which you showed the citations, but only trying to move fully listed sources from the Reference section into the Bibliography to conform with the existing style. The three sources that I moved don't seem to match the existing style of the reference section that for the most part only shows author or title and page number.
I am a relatively new editor and I am only trying to improve articles within the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia. Your kind response will help educate me. Thank you for your time, Virgil VFF0347 (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- @VFF0347: It is quite common for full citations to be given for online sources, and shorter ones for book and journal sources alone, which is the style used in that article. I don't have a significant opposition to a consistent shorter citation style, but only if it provides an improvement. If the article used {{sfn}} or a related template to link the short and long citations together, then that would be improved functionality. As it is, the change you made would have made it harder to find and link through to the relevant citation.
- I have no problem with the infobox change; I had missed that in the edit, my apologies. Harrias talk 18:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Sir, much appreciated. Virgil VFF0347 (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Budgies v Bayern
Hey, good to see you there. As normal, my aim is GAN then FAC, co-nominations welcome. Dweller is onboard as and when he has time. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 12:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: What can I say, I'm easily distracted! Harrias talk 12:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Terrific work, chaps. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1991 European Super Cup
The article 1991 European Super Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1991 European Super Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HawkAussie -- HawkAussie (talk) 01:21, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup
The article 1982 Women's Cricket World Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1982 Women's Cricket World Cup for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
