User talk:Iggyhajduk

Welcome!

Hello, Iggyhajduk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Casimer&Casimir, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO A&E⇑ 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Casimer&Casimir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Casimer&Casimir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO A&E⇑ 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Casimer&casimir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casimer&casimir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casimer&casimir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 22:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I would like to create a page for Casimer Pascal's new duo (Casimer&Casimir) since the split of his critically praised group PAS/CAL. I work with the band and next Wednesday their new release will be feature on MTVHive.com. The duo needs the simplest entry. They've been covered quite possibly the most significant music site, Pitchfork on multiple occasions. Additionally they have an entry on AllMusic.com which links to Casimer and his previous group PAS/CAL. Thanks!

I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not for promotion. It's inappropriate for you to be editing the article about the band when you work for them. --Chris (talk) 23:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I work WITH not FOR the band. I am a friend of the band who proposed the idea that Casimer Pascal's (a significant American songwriter) latest project should have an entry in Wiki for same reason there is an entry for Casimer&Casimir on Allmusic.com because of the notability of the artist involved.

To paraphrase what Chris said above, Wikipedia is not for promotion. It's inappropriate for you to be editing the article about the band when you work with them. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

talk, Dennis & others, the fact that the duo exists and is notable is not speculation:
1. Arguably the most influential modern music press, Pitchfork, maintains an artist page for Casimer & Casimir http://pitchfork.com/artists/29948-casimer-casimir/
2. The All Music Guide has an entry for Casimer & Casimir http://www.allmusic.com/artist/casimer-casimir-p2556089
3. One of the highest regard public radio stations, KCRW, has Casimer & Casimir in rotation http://newmedia.kcrw.com/tracklists/index.php?search_type=0&date_from=01%2F15%2F2012&host=Eric+J.+Lawrence&date_to=&artist=&channel=Simulcast&label=
4. Casimer & Casimir is being noted by international sources in Italy (http://www.frizzifrizzi.it/2012/01/22/sunday-morning-38/), France (http://www.agence-flair.fr/2655565/FLAIR), and UK (http://soundsxp.com/artman2/publish/mp3/Casimer_Casimir_-_In_The_New_Year_Walkmen_cover_free_MP3.shtml).
5. The notable songwriter, Casimer Pascal, from PAS/CAL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAS/CAL) is a part of this duo. This new musical venture is notable because it is his first utterance since the split of PAS/CAL. Do a google search for more...

Instead of deletion, could one of you kind editors edit the page so it is in accordance to Wiki standards? Or give exact instruction,,,

Have a look at our criteria for musician notability. Can you prove that this group meets at least one of those criteria? --Chris (talk) 15:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) Chris, under the criteria you linked to, two articles #1 & #6 would have relevance to the proofs I provided above.

Speedy deletion nomination of Casimer&Casimir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Casimer&Casimir, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —SW— ^chat 00:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:71.201.40.249/Enter your new article name here

Hello, Iggyhajduk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Enter your new article name here".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Даңқ23 (talk) 08:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:71.201.40.249/Enter your new article name here

User:71.201.40.249/Enter your new article name here, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:71.201.40.249/Enter your new article name here and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:71.201.40.249/Enter your new article name here during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. kingboyk (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]