User talk:Jnanashuddhi

Welcome!

Hello, Jnanashuddhi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 16:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Anti-Hindu sentiment, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am an expert on this topic. Why are you imposing sanctions if there is nothing wrong with my work? Jnanashuddhi (talk) 15:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you can not understand how an encyclopaedia works, then this is not the place for you. If you continue this behavior, your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 17:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you delete others talk entries without any discussion and you do not know what consensus means, this is not the place for you either. Jnanashuddhi (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Hindu Human Rights. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 11:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit should go at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Human Rights.- Sjö (talk) 11:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! Jnanashuddhi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm WikiLinuz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Anti-Hindu sentiment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 08:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the source

https://www.lexico.com/definition/hinduphobia Jnanashuddhi (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then please WP:CITE the source on the article page. The WP:BURDEN to demonstrate verifiability lies with you. You can use Template:Cite web when citing with Lexico, Oxford University Press as publisher. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 11:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-Hindu sentiment. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 12:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The statements of the Hindutva Harassment Field manual are not academically verified nor consensus and are included in this article without qualification. It needs to state, 'the field manual claims', or 'this content is not verified' as the claims are unsubstantiated as per the reference provided. Please check this reference and tell me your reasoning for rejecting the edit.Jnanashuddhi (talk) 12:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read: Wikipedia:Original research. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 12:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Hindutva harassment field manual liberally cited in this wiki entry is wholly 'original research' and unlike the above source contains no scholarly references, only media articles reliant on hearsay. This page should be consistent on its standards. Jnanashuddhi (talk) 14:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jnanashuddhi! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Anti-Hindu sentiment several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Anti-Hindu sentiment, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 23:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed in detail and it is an edit war because Lexico is powered by Oxford English Dictionary and it is a verified source. On what ground do you declare Oxford English Dictionary not a verified source? Jnanashuddhi (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jnanashuddhi: Fyi, Lexico is not Oxford English Dictionary. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 20:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the wikipedia entry. "Lexico is an online dictionary website that provides a collection of English and Spanish dictionaries produced by Oxford University Press (OUP), the publishing house of the University of Oxford." You are saying because it isn't OED proper, the content isn't verified. But the content is from OUP as stated on the site. Your issue seems to be that you don't recognise the word Hinduphobia, you don't want it to be defined by anyone other than someone affiliated with 'Hindutva' as per above comments, despite it having nothing to do with that etymologically or lexicographically, and no amount of educating you will change it. Jnanashuddhi (talk) 10:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jnanashuddhi: Do not put words into my mouth. You've never cited any supposed peer-reviewed scholarship on the talk pages; if you continue your WP:INCOMPETENT behavior, you may get sanctioned. If you want something to be changed on Wikipedia, cite a scholarly source that supports your premise; if you cannot do that, your points are valueless, and will be ignored by other editors. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 18:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stick to the issue raised specifically. The Lexico entry is sourced from OUP. What is your objection to it specifically? Please refer to the verified sources document to discuss this, not your personal opinion. You cannot sanction and abuse me for raising this legitimate point. In addition my objection to the inclusion of non peer reviewed content does not require a peer reviewed document to be raised. Jnanashuddhi (talk) 01:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]