User talk:Jorditxei

template

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.Shoessss 16:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oxera

There's nothing dictatorial about my actions. Your article did not suit Wikipedia notability guidelines (WP:CORP), and it was deletable under WP:CSD#G11 because the article was written like an advertisement for Oxera. Nishkid64 (talk) 20:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators are supposed to delete articles that go against policy. I looked at your article, and it still read like an advertisement for the company. Please see WP:NPOV and WP:CORP. I didn't delete it just because of WP:CSD#G11 but also because of the non-notability of the company (WP:CORP). Any article that doesn't meet notability guidelines is subject to deletion. I'll undelete the article for now, and you can make the necessary corrections to make it comply with Wikipedia policy. Also, Wikipedia does not allow WP:OR, so you must source information in the article. Nishkid64 (talk) 20:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would appreciate it if you could stop calling my actions "dictatorial". I am just following procedure, and doing my duties as an administrator. Nishkid64 (talk) 20:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont get your message

I just received a message from you saying that I had delited templates and that I would be blocked. Sorry but dont understand your dictatorial manners. I erased the stub logo because the article was no longer a stub. Good luck.--Jorditxei 18:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The warning was for removing the speedy deletion tag on an article you were involved with Oxera. The policy for when you disagree with a speedy deletion is to place a {hangon} on the article and explain why you disagree with the speedy deletion. Moreover, an administrator will make the final decision. You just cannot remove the tag. Hope this helps. Shoessss 10:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki española

Yo creo que no he podido ser más claro. No creo ni entiendo que hubiese que bloquearte, y más de esa forma. De todas formas veremos a ver qué decide el CRC.

Si necesitas cualquier cosa, te recuerdo que además de mi página de aquí puedes mandarme un mensaje al correo electrónico.

Un saludo, Filipo2 11:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creo, aunque no estoy del todo seguro, que te puedes registrar y, a pesar de estar bloqueado y no poder editar, enviar correos electrónicos. Te lo digo para que no te juegues otro bloqueo a tu nueva IP si te ven editando.

En cuanto a la reclamación, me pareció bastante bien fundada. Yo espero que salga adelante y te desbloqueen, pero está en manos de los miembros del CRC. El problema de qué es una acusación ad hominem, qué no lo es, etc. es que todo se puede tergiversar y malinterpretar de cualquier forma.

Por cierto, sí que tengo dado de alta el e-mail aquí. No sé por qué no ha funcionado. --Filipo2 13:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Jordtixei. Happy to see you too. We are supposed to write in English here so everybody can see what are we saying. You must learn from your experience in Wikipedia in Spanish. Here things are less personal and more formal so you must follow procedures to the letter. Because in English is easier to find good sources, dicussion here is more based on sources. Also I think the age of people is older so thought is more structured. However this is also a very demmanding environement and netiquette is enforced thoroughly. Be cautious and do not engage continuously or you will run in problems. 11-M article seems to be calm nowadays once the Randroide was neutralized by Jim62 but storm can unleash at any moment. Enjoy and take care. --Igor21 12:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)PS : IMHO your bloking was excesive but it happened in a background of turmoil were nobody was in the mood to sustain discussions about the many issues you arised. IMHO you were blocked because there was no energy to deal with your energy. You would have been a valuable resource and perhaps you can come back at some point. I hope so.[reply]

salut

sorry si je ne suis pas toujours clair. J'ai surtout été actif sur wikipedia:fr et le français est ma langue materternelle que tu sembles très bien parler !
Féliciations pour ton boulot sur wikipedia:en en tout cas et en particulier sur l'article causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus.
Cheers, Alithien 16:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA = Good Article

And why not a FA : Featured Article ;-) ?
See you, Alithien 17:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

not neutral

Hello,
I think this [1] is not neutral and not really correct.
I think it would be better to add a quote from a valuable reference stating that the right of return is justified by the fact that palestinians were chased and given they were not *all* chased and that the issue is controversed, it should be written that way :

MrSomeone thinks that (...) <quote> right of return (...) because (...) chased </quote>

I don't know if you have such reference ?
What you added about Lehi/Haganah/Irgoun is not at all accurate. This only concerns 2 waves of refugees and the author in the reference you use is not reliable if he writes that this concerns the whole palestinian exodus...
What do you think about that ? Alithien 17:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

ok.

First and second waves are only 50%. (100k + 250/300k).

Alithien 17:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol lol lol

World is very little ! You live at Brussels :-)

At the occasion we could meet to discuss.

I just refer to Birth revisited

Ch. The second wave - conclusion - p.262 : (...) "resulting in 250,000-300,000 refugees".

Ch. The fist wave - p.67 : "by the end of march 1948, somme 100,000 Arabs (...)".

350k-400k out of ~750k -> I rounded this to 50% but this is not a real important matter ;-)

Alithien 17:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NB: As you see I have Birth revisited at home BUT if I could give an advice : don't buy this book !

Righteous victims is a very intersting and well written book but the Birth revisited is un-readable. This is just a compendium of events :-( Alithien 18:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I live at Liege, this is 100 km east of Brussels. Alithien 18:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I answered but do not agree you remove this flag. As written, I am looking for a solution to neutralize this section, which is not neutral. sorry :-(. Alithien 18:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why Plan Dalet(h) cannot be a milestone the table of "depopulated villages"

Hi Jorditxei,

Plan D

Khalidi, Nusrala et Pappé pensent que le Plan Daleth est une *preuve* qu'un nettoyage ethnique était prévu par le Yichouv dès mars 1948.
Morris, Gelber, Laurens pensent le contraire et rejettent cette idée. Ils disent que c'est la "guerre" et de multiples autres causes qui en découlent, qui sont la cause de l'exode palestinien. Ils ne parlent d'ailleurs pas de nettoyage ethnique pour cette période mais de fuite.
Ils expliquent bien que les expulsions systématiques eurent lieu plus tard.
Dès lors, prendre le Plan Dalet comme tournant est donc orienté, c'est lui donner un rôle. Or, ce point de vue (pov) est loin d'être partagé ! (et si tu lis l'article fr:Plan Daleth, je pense que tu te convaincras que cette hypothèse est même absurde mais c'est hors sujet).
Mais en conclusion, sa présence n'est pas anodine et sous-entend quelque chose -> that is POV. :-)

Commentaires sur les chiffres du tableau

Les commentaires écrits me posent aussi problème. Car ce sont des commentaires de Khalidi. On voit apparaître les mots destructions de maison. J'ai effacé également ce qui concernant la ré-installation d'immigrants juifs.
Comme pour le plan Daleth, c'est POV et c'est faux.
Il n'y a eu aucune réinstallation avant fin 1948.
Les mots employés non plus ne sont pas neutres : "depopulated or destroyed" villages. J'ai ajouté "abandonned, depopulated or destroyed". Mais si on lit Morris, on devrait dire :

wave 1 and wave 2 : abandonned villages
wave 3 and wave 4 : abandonned, evacuated and/or destroyed villages

Il n'est pas évident de donner des commentaires sur ces chiffres car l'analyse de ces chiffres ressort de TOUTE la problématique du problème de l'exode palestinien et UNE SEULE analyse ne peut pas convenir.
Cheers, Alithien 07:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My French is not very good, but I read that as denying that Plan Dalet concerned ethnic cleansing, saying it didn't begin until the end of 1948. And I think it's most disputed, certainly by Morris eg Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited 2004, p.165 "Each brigade was instructed: In the conquest of villages in your area, you will determine - whether to cleanse or destroy them - in consultation with your Arab affairs advisers and HIS officers ... You are permitted to restrict - insofar as you are able - cleansing, conquest and destruction operations of enemy villages in your area.

The plan was neither understood nor used by the senior field officers as a blanket instruction for the expulsion of `the Arabs'. But, in providing for the expulsion or destruction of villages that had resisted or might threaten the Yishuv, it constituted a strategic-doctrinal basis and carte blanche for expulsions. PalestineRemembered 11:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Draft of new "Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus"

Hola Jorditxei!

I started a draft User:Pedro Gonnet/Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus. Feel free to help move content over and polish it up a bit! Cheers, Pedro Gonnet 16:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EC Comp law

Thanks for your work so far! Please do keep adding. Wik idea 13:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perdone usted

Hola, verás participé en la wikipedia española durante unos días en el artículo sobre la "Barrera israelí de Cisjordania". El caso es que apareció un tal Yonderboy y Kordas, que deben ser empleados a sueldo de algún lobby israelí, y empezaron a revertir mis cambios. Primero decían que si había que dar referencias "serias", cuando se las di, entonces empezaron a decir que su inclusión debía ser "pertinente" (lo eran a todas luces) y luego el tal Yonderboy dijo que si yo era un tal Mikemoore. Luego apareció un tal Escarlati (un amiguete del tal Yonderboy) que bloqueó la página en cuestión de décimas de segundo después de que Yonderboy revirtiera mis cambios (telepatía!!). Esta clarísimo que estos dos usuarios utilizaron el correo electrónico para bloquear la página o como mínimo que el tal Escarlati se cuidó mucho de no cometer el "error" de bloquearla antes de que el tal Yonderboy revirtiera mis cambios (otro usuario de wikipedia me dijo que ya había pasado una vez contigo, que el tal Escarlati había bloqueado una página para que se quedara la versión de Yonderboy, por cierto en qué artículo?). Luego coge un tal Bucefalo y me bloquea dos semanas (!) por "intimidación y acoso a usuarios" (aquí hubiera puesto yo a "amiguetes"), no se debió leer las acusaciones previas de esos usuarios digo yo. Pero bueno, ahí no termina todo, resulta que el tal Kordas coge y presenta una "denuncia" diciendo que yo soy tú. Lo peor no es eso, resulta que un tal Drini dice que hay "evidencias" que señalan a que sí somos la misma persona (toma ya!). Así que nada, quería pedirte un favor: podrías indicarles a estas personas que ese no es el caso? Lo veo jodido que demuestren nada porque yo estoy en Oxford y no creo que tú hayas escrito nada por aquí, así que.. pero bueno, para que se aclare esto, pues mejor. Enga, que te vaya bien! PD: Muy buenos tus artículos, sigue así! --86.2.126.96 18:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your input at Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive

Since you are a member of WikiProject Economics, I would like to direct your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive. We are currently deciding on an economics-related article to bring to Featured Article status and we would like your input. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 15:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

Catalan Culture Challenge

I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Cartel

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cartel, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.oecd.org/regreform/sectors/2376087.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Cartel and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Cartel, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cartel. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Cartel with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cartel saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 14:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Your addition to Cartel has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 20:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]