User talk:Luna Santin/Archive 10

Talk – Sandbox – Suggestions

This is an archive of past discussion. Please do not modify it.

If you need to continue or revive one of these discussions, feel free to start a new thread on my talk page.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28

1 « [[User talk:Luna Santin/Archive 10|‹See Tfd›10]] ‹ Archive 10 › [[User talk:Luna Santin/Archive 10|‹See Tfd›10]] » 28

New Magic Kirin/Reapor sockpuppet

New user account User:Reapor2 appears to be a sockpuppet; checkuser unnecessary (see Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Decato). JRSP 00:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this new user's contributions[1], I think it may be a new sock JRSP 21:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Self-block request

Hi Luna, thank you in advance.

As per my request in the closed IRC channel #wikimedia-admin, I hereby request a 24 hour block to cool down from the WP:VPP#Summary of F.A.C section above uproar.

--Connel MacKenzie - wikt 03:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i just signed up for wikipedia today because i wanted to edit an article about the crime in el salvador which contained incorrect and out-dated information. i then recieved something saying i cannot edit it and now i'm blocked from editing anything. block me all you want but you need to be more careful on the things that are being put into these articles, make sure they are actual facts and not a bunch of false statements being written by 12 year olds and racists. I will not have my country insulted on wikipedia!!!

Matteo747 05:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

jj0909jj

You recently reverted this edit by User:Jj0909jj. This user has been doing practically nothing on Wikipedia except for making edits like that ([2], [3], [4], [5]) and adding lots of really bizzare stuff ([6]). Tens of edits by them have been reverted. Paul Cyr has already provided a final warning on their talk page; it might be time for a block... -/- Warren 06:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After further review I decided to send it off to AIV, and now they're blocked. Onwards. :) -/- Warren 06:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Valentines Day!

I wish you and your family have a wonderful Valentines Day!

Kamope · talk · contributions 12:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hate To Sound Bossy...

I hate to sound bossy, but did you get my E-mail? (Sorry, I really don't mean to sound bossy!) Acalamari 21:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I can wait, but the E-mail's subject requires that I don't post anything to the noticeboard. It concerns a "favorite" user of ours, and a more important situation. Sadly, I have to keep the topic off the talk pages for the moment. Acalamari 21:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for unblocking me.

Beelzebarn 21:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Could I just ask you a question? Why is the sea bird article so long, and why did you revert my edits?--63.138.11.3 23:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want an answer, NOW! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.138.11.3 (talk) 2 February 2007

RE:SEGA

User_talk:Luna_Santin/Archive_18#SEGA; I had to open a new case. Just letting you know. Cheers! -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 15:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Help

Here, Wikipedia:Help desk#Time Userbox. Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 3:01pm, February 3, 2007

* Luna-San asks for the severed head of Wikipe-tan

You asked, I deliver. Note that, in addition to bleeding from her mouth, she's also bleeding just a bit from the corner of her eye?

DS 00:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your unblock help

You left notes on my talk page indicating that you helped negotiate a partial unblock of my IP address. Thanks!

There are still two things I am confused about, and I would be grateful if you can help clear things up for me:

how can I see a query that shows that I am blocked? I tried a lot of different ways, but never saw my IP address. Neither this autoblock query [7] nor Special:Ipblocklist seemed to include me.
how can I find out why I was blocked? I saw the text "CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address is being used abusively" but I can't imagine that anyone at this IP would have done anything like that. As the responsible party behind that IP, I'd like to know if I'm wrong!

Thanks greatly,

JBazuzi 02:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for clarifying that :-) 203.211.116.57 09:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blockage Request

G'day. Could you please block User_talk:216.108.4.72, whose edit to featured article of the day you just reverted? He's done a whole bunch of vandalism and gotten away with only warnings over the past two months Leon 09:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) Leon 09:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

I'm beginner .Can you teach me to create a big one article ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Encyclopedia a-z (talk • contribs).

HI HI i'm so happy you answer me

Hi my name is tong im in thailand .Do you know that ? in south east asia . Hey where are you please tell me . what do you think about wikipedia ? how old are you ? im 20 please talk to me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Encyclopedia a-z (talk • contribs) 11:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Population genetics of the british isles

Theres nothing wrong with this article, please if you can find some sources that oppose common veiws add them to the article, if you cant then stop whinging.

I cant understand why you would want to delete this article. please, you seem to be a celtic enthusiast so if you can find reliable sources supporting your celtic enthusiasm please add them , else dont add them. this article is about the genetics of the british isles anyway, you linguistic source is of total irrelevance and nless you can cite a reliable source tieing together genetic evidence with celtic invasion claims then there is no reason to add any of your celtic claims to the article as they would be purely your own opinion.

You can add as many genetic sources as you want, but you can only add historical/linguistic sources if they are tied into a source that includes genetic information. )

You cannot delete all the genetic data about irish people just becuase you think that some subclade of r1b found in la tene region is similar to a subclade found in ireland. That should be startlingly obvious to someone as intelligent as you, hence I therefore deem you as biased and with a certain political agenda.

--Globe01 13:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ostrich burgers

Er, why did you remove my article? Sure it needs a bit of expanding and cleaning up- but it was never going to be perfect right from the start. You see, that kind of attitude is precisely what we don't need round here, I mean what exactly did you think you were playing at son?--Pope Ostrich Burger 14:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for lifting the autoblock! Kamope · talk · contributions 22:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

about the el salvador page

i wanted to know what happened to the tourism section of wikipedia that took me 3 hours to create? i have no idea of why you or anybody would take it off... i do know there is people vandilising but i thought you said you have specific people watching out for vandalism... everything that i wrote is true and if you need proof i will send you the articles but im just mad because the whole el salvador article is WRONG! and im trying to help and contribute the truth because i am from that country so i know and it seems like i try to add things but they get taken off... honestly if you dont appreciate the truth then there shouldnt be no country info because whats the point on displaying incorrect information?!... i dont find a point to it so please let me know if your the only person incharge because i would seriously like to talk to somebody about this because i really dont get it and i want truth in this page not stuff from the 1980's so please write back and tell me who else i can speak with. thanks Matteo747 02:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHU

Thanks for your help with my formatting at WP:CHU, I appreciate it.--Moonraker88 11:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 6	5 February 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation organizational changes enacted	Group of arbitrators makes public statement about IRC
AstroTurf PR firm discovered astroturfing	WikiWorld comic: "Clabbers"
News and notes: More legal citations, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me out again?

You helped with the last batch of JB196 socks but some more have cropped up that need blocking at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Damastakilla which uncovered these socks by accident. –– Lid^(Talk) 22:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, 135 sockpuppets isn't an easy task and considering the user this number will not be stopping any time soon. –– Lid^(Talk) 09:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

80.47.239.175 VANDAL

Dear Luna, who is this 80.47.239.175? He (or she) messed around with one of my newly created pages 'House of Bread Monastery'. If you hadn't checked, it might have stayed vandalized (although it is on my watchlist). Shouldn't we be tougher with somebody like that? I mean he messed up a bunch of pages today. Just a thought. Keep up the great work too! ;-) --RobNS 01:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David A. Yeagley

Hi, we're still having trouble with the same type of IP vandalism (most likely done by the same individual) at David A. Yeagley. Thanks for your help with this in the past, and hope you can protect again. Badagnani 18:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Salmonish

Thanks for taking care of that. I was going to speedy the page for the move vandalism, but you beat me to it. :) Kari Hazzard (T | C) 20:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

shrug* Block and ask questions later. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 20:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it's been compromised. The edit history is consistent with a racist, homophobic vandal. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 20:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to protect the talk page too. User doesn't seem to get that you don't remove warnings therefrom unless they are legitimately incorrect. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 20:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind if I steal your "User-Talk-Contribs-My Sandbox-Improve Me!" box? Kari Hazzard (T | C) 20:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problem brewing at St. Petersburg paradox

We seem to have a problem brewing at the article on the St. Petersburg paradox. See the article and especially see Talk:St. Petersburg paradox#“one cannot buy that which is not sold”. iNic, having been frustrated in his attempt to interpret a point and then to dismiss the point, has now deleted content which has been justified on the talk page, insisting that, to be acceptable, it must simultaneously

be brief
explictly express everything that was said in in the lengthy discussion on the talk page

I have repeatedly noted to him that it is not acceptable to render an article wrong in order to make it more accessible, and have now placed a warning on his user talk page. —SlamDiego 22:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

I noticed you dealing with the sockpuppets User:Tongon and User:Reapor2. I believe a new account User:Hapkdo is yet another sockpuppet. I looked around for an established report somewhere to report this but couldn't find one, so I hope you can take a look. Thanks, auburnpilot talk 23:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spotted and blocked by Yamla. Thanks, auburnpilot talk 01:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thanks For Advising Me On Protecting My User Page! AC Best 08:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanx fr warning

this re Yisroel Dovid Weiss. the background is complicated but the acctual dispute is simply about following blp rules etc (imho;). also what should be done about yeshivish (talk · contribs) who commonly rvs without comment? & can you tell me if it go straight to rfm, rather than m-cabal? have tried every other suggestion on the list (wikette, rfc blp etc.) & i personally wasn't that impressed with the last m-cabal i saw. ⇒ bsnowball 09:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

thanks for removing vandalisum from my page that trolly been vandalising tons of pages ♥sailor cuteness-ready for love♥ 21:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, thanks for the swift revert to both user and talk pages of mine. Tut, I only turned my back for two minutes! Bubba hotep 21:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Third Opinion

Hi Luna. I appreciate your Third Op on Brassai but I think you may have mistinerpreted some facts. I gather this only because you concluded that saying Brassai is Hungarian is less reliable than saying he's Jewish. Everyone single on of Brassai's English biographies say pretty directly that Brassai is Hungarian, born and bred, and further, nearly every link that can be found online says the same. Out of those biographies, all mention his mother as Armenian and his father as Hungarian. No published books in English state he or his parents were Jewish. In fact, Halász Gyula: A századik év küszöbén. Bukarest, 1967, Brassai's autobiography in Hungarian, written after the war, says that Brassai and Brassai' parents were not Jewish. This is backed up by his memoirs, Letters to my Parents (written in the 1920s, translated into English) in which you can find letters to his father talking extensively about not being able to come home for Christmas, and spending Christmas at someone else's home. Though it would be original research to derive from those statements that Brassai was himself Christian, his statements about Jews, such as "we found a room for 50 Czech crowns at an old Jewish lady's house (I wish we hadn't!)" makes it clear that he's writing to his parents about Jewish people in a way as to suggest them a separate people. This wouldn't make sense if Brassai or either one of his parents were Jewish. The only places that I could find anywhere online that make the statement that Brassai is Jewish is here http://www.newstatesman.com/200602270034 and http://yiddishbookcenter.org/pdf/pt/41/pt41_JewishEye.pdf..

Neither of these authors are experts on Brassai and certainly not more than Brassai is an expert on himself, and so per WP:RS "Expertise of the originator about the subject—An academic expert in one subject is more reliable when writing about that subject than when writing about another. For example, a biologist is more reliable when writing about biology than when writing about nuclear physics" this would lessen the reliability of their reports. Though my emailing of the first author is bordering on original research it goes on to prove that there appears to be no documentations of Brassai's Jewish heritage and that the source is based on hearsay. There is strong reason to conclude WP:RS#bias "Bias of the originator about the subject—If an author has some reason to be biased, or admits to being biased, this should be taken into account when reporting his or her opinion." After all, both men are reporting on emigrant Hungarian Jewish photographers, and so including Brassai, an emigrant Hungarian photographer, in the bunch would help strengthen the point. To conclude that Brassai was trying to hide his Jewish ancestry (in the 1920s and 1960s, at that) would be bordering on original research and questioning the validity of reporting something the person themselves' would wish to remain unreported.

There is no way to dismiss the later sources but to equivalently dismiss Brassai's own autobiography as being false about his ethnic background is even more ridiculous, and thats whats currently happening on Brassai and List of Hungarian Jews. 141.213.210.88 23:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need Administrator help

A vandal IP 68.80.30.39 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) that you blocked on January 21 has returned under the user account Josh Allain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). The vandal is returning back to the same articles and edits that got him blocked in the first place. Your assistance would be appreciated. Thank you. 142.166.250.14 00:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hm... I'd encourage you to bring that up with the originally blocking administrator, User:Tone, or at the admin noticeboard. Luna Santin 08:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! I wonder what I did to set this person off? =) Midnightdreary 01:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Cheers, for reverting the page.

Fr33kMan 01:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

In my brief time on this spinning globe, I have learned this; civility is the most insidious form of disingenuity. I will call a pedant a pedant, and a presumptuous jerk will be called as such, as well. Delete the account, place me under administrative review, or understand that I do not insult without cause. The atomic weight of lead won't care a wit. --ttogreh 04:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ermac

Thanks for the third opinion on the Ermac page. I was getting tired of arguing in circles.--Iamstillhiro1112 23:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my page?

I created that page to honor the great Nick Cappozolli. Haven't you heard of him? You just wasted 30 minutes of my time you ungrateful... Please allow me to recreate! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheGeneral2k7 (talk • contribs) 11 February 2007.

Killercop.com

Dear Luna, What happened to killercop.com? You said some very interesting things.

Thank You, He who named the site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.107.50.76 (talk) 07:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Naked Brothers Band

Hi Luna, my name is Zach and I would like to know if you would be able to semi protect the episode list which is on List of The Naked Brothers Band episodes this link. There are two people which are editing it and getting rid of the information. thanks. 69.248.178.147 20:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if I get blocked. as an IP adress

Kate McAuliffe

Hey Luna, thanks for blocking this guy; can you also salt Kate McAuliffe to stop him from continually recreating it? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 01:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Might as well protect it now; there's no reason to think he'll stop anytime soon. This has already been going on since last October. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 01:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Have sent an email re an article- i do hope its not a nuisance Satu Suro 13:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

confused

hi there,

I have never edited a page on here in my life and only go on wikipedia to browse stuff but when I clicked on a red link once it said something about my ip address being blocked because of abuse or whatever. So I clicked on the page that tells you all the rules that were violated and it had a whole bunch of stuff saying that I made innapropriate edits to a whole bunch of pages. This doesn't make sense because 1) i have never edited anything on here; 2) there were a whole bunch of edits made one after another on pages that I have never even browsed. Any insight on why this is? I would never do the things it says that I have done on here

thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hk55 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

E-mail

Hello. I've sent you an email (just a heads-up). Thanks. MastCell 00:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clerking

Are you able to pop into IRC? I need to ask you a few thing, and noticed you were online :) — D e on555^talk_desk^{sign here!} 01:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for blocking the IP vandal who left the "bitch star" on my page (wow, attempted to impersonate another editor *and* make personal attack all in one stupid move). I just love reverting the vandals... (*sigh*) I love it even more when their retaliations get them blocked :-) ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 03:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. ;) Glad to be of service. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I just noticed the vandal made another personal attack before he was blocked: [8] ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 04:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 7	12 February 2007	About the Signpost

US government agencies discovered editing	Comment prompts discussion of Wikimedia's financial situation
Board recapitulates licensing policy principles	WikiWorld comic: "Extreme ironing"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Regarding your edit to Hal Turner:

Your recent edit to Hal Turner (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 07:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no! Qxz turned vandal on us. :( We're all doomed. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read the diff – the bot reverted the reverter, rather than the vandal. (Does it often do this...?) – Qxz 07:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Make Way for Ducklings

In context, you mean "a whole paddling of accounts" rather than "a whole gaggle of accounts". (Further reference.) -- Ben 12:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Failed.

Sorry Luna Santin, the auto-unblock you gave me didn't work. I realized that the request was showing the wrong IP address. I thank you for taking the trouble of trying to unblock me. Next time it shows an incorrect IP, I'll correct it myself so no one ends up unblocking the wrong IP. Arjun01 was able to unblock me. Sorry Luna Santin. Acalamari 16:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hosting a game on my user page.

If have the time go to my user page and see what the game is.Sam ov the blue sand 22:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Cooling Down Some of the Heat

Hey Luna, thanks for reverting the IP's "constructive criticism" of myself :P. Also thanks for cooling down some of the heat.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from California Gold Rush

Thanks for lending a hand protecting today Main page FA! NorCalHistory 01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hanyang University has dishonest things in its entry.

Much of what is on this site is unverifiable, and some if it is simply not true. For example, the entry below claims that Hanyang University ranks 210th in the world. Such is not only unverifiable: it is also a lie (see http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2006/ARWU2005_102-200.htm). The following entry is advertizing produced by Hanyang University. This is not what Wikipedia was made for, is it? So, consider carefully whether or not you trust this source of information about this university.

I posted the above material with the entry, yet you deleted it. The entry itself, however, which is full of outrageous comments clearly and verifiably dishonest, remains. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.72.88.166 (talk) 04:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

User: Mr. Dercy

Is very similar to User: Mr. Darcy, isn't it? Real96 07:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotecting

I noticed you sprotected Brett Favre. Do you have a big issue if I unprotect?--Isotope23 15:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool... unfortunately it is the best way to root out the last few vestiges of this mess.--Isotope23 20:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the vandal revert on my user page. I guess that guy didn't like my afd vote. Dave6 ^talk 17:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your name

Luna, I hope you don't mind. I used your name in my award for Selket bot shown here, since sometimes you edit from college. Real96 17:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I was so astounded by it, I didn't know what to say in my deletion reason, but I found you'd already taken over :) riana_dzasta 20:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good looking out

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page. It was done by the sockpuppet of a vandal account that I had blocked earlier. See User:Allatropic.--Jersey Devil 22:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Lithuania

Sorry for disturbing, but maybe there would be a way to stop vandalism, including partial protection, because it seems to be gone out of control for now.--Lokyz 22:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explanation.--Lokyz 23:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Thank you very much for reverting my User page :-) Will 23:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing legitimate comments

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GDG2 23:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diffs are here: [9] [10] GDG2 23:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking....

Did you really intend to indef an IP? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 23:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Check it .... Yuser31415 23:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking an account anon only

I noticed that Carbide77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has a block log that shows a block of (anon. only, account creation blocked). This doesn't do anything does it? --WikiSlasher 00:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you very much Luna Santin for reverting vandalism to my userpage. Happy editing!--PrestonH | talk | contribs | editor review | 00:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked....

983,040 IP addresses - thank God we have range blocks! Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock attack

Thanks for the help! I'll be back online tomorrow, and I'll try to sort things out then (and thank all the others who helped revert). yandman 11:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planemo (blocked as a sockpuppet)

Hi, Luna Santin!

I'm writing because I see you put an indefinite block on Planemo about six weeks ago.

Today I left a welcome message for a new user who calls himself Necrosapiant. This person apparently just signed up a couple of days ago, but seems quite knowledgeable of WP procedures (he deleted a "prod" tag I had placed here). I took a look at Necrosapiant's contributions, and noticed that the only other thing this "new" user has done so far is reinstate a comment by Planemo that had been deleted about the same time as you imposed the indefinite block.

I don't know if it's the same person, or not, but figured you might appreciate a heads up. Thanks! DavidCBryant 00:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

T

Regarding what you wrote on my talk page, I just feel that Macaw 54 might keep coming back under different user names. Any way to prevent this?? Georgia guy 01:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, regarding the edit Internet 444 made, I'm quite sure he's a sockpuppet of Macaw 54, and please label him as such. Georgia guy 01:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

--Java7837 21:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for un-autoblocking me Luna Santing

-- Jix avius 21:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like A Maiden

Hey Luna...this is apparently a fake album assembled by illegal download sites. I was just about to speedy it, but I'm not sure what category to use. What do you think? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 22:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, looks like someone went ahead and deleted it. Are there any logs that tell you what rationale the deleting admin used? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 22:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For looking into my request for usurpation. I really hope that I can acquire the username Ali, after all, it is my real name! You have continually been quite helpful to me and other users on Wikipedia (for me, particularly with the partial unblock of 206.213.157.4, which allows me to edit Wikipedia at school), and I really appreciate it. Again, thank you! --Nevhood 23:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David A. Yeagley

Hi, why do you continue to unprotect David A. Yeagley when you know the anon vandal is persistent about this? In fact, it seems to be his life's work to vandalize this article. Continuing to unprotect is not a good solution, in my opinion. Badagnani 00:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. As the disruption is being done by a single individual (though using multiple, related IPs), I think protecting only for new/anon users would be appropriate, to allow for legitimate editing. Badagnani 00:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 8	19 February 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Arbitrator Dmcdevit resigns; replacements to be appointed	Essay questions Wikipedia's success: Abort, Retry, Fail?
In US, half of Wikipedia traffic comes from Google	WikiWorld comic: "Tony Clifton"
News and notes: Brief outage, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a small note, and a kittenstar!

Thanks for reverting my talk page; I am not sure what I did to bring the wrath of that editor upon myself, but I bear no ill will towards the person, even if they do not feel the same towards myself. Excellent job at being so quick; by the time I got the new messages bar it was already fixed, which I was most certainly not expecting. I hereby present you with this kittenstar as a token of gratitude for making my day brighter. I hope you have a most wonderful day, and happy editing! Kyra_~(talk) 09:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Another user told me earlier to report to WP:AIV those names which are Inapporiate [11] --Cometstyles 19:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock attack

Thanks for the help and protection on my user page. I'm busy outside of WP today, so you can keep the protection on for a day or so. I never thought of Kevin Federline as a flash-point. Cheers! --EarthPerson 18:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Quick note

Thank you. I was concerned because his phone number was saved in the page history, but I was not aware of the Oversight feature. Appreciate the help. --Nevhood 20:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

10,000 Accounts.

Did you read the message SeaWorld01/Starwars1955 left on his talk page before the message was removed (it's still in the history) and the page protected? Do you really believe that he has 10,000 accounts? I don't believe it, as I think it's a bluff. As you said, he should just give up: he is wasting everyone's time, including his own. Acalamari 22:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he does have a lot of sleepers. I think 10,000 is a bluff; it would take a lot of time to just to acutally set up all those accounts. Acalamari 23:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You vandalism fighter, you!

**〈RED VEЯS〉** awards this Barnstar to **Luna Santin** for being an ace vandalism fighter.

Thanks for the RVV on my user page! 〈RED VEЯS〉 23:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I think the vandal vandalized it because he/she got mad after I warned him/her with test1. Kamope·?·! Sign! 23:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you from me too!--Kubigula (talk) 01:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Glassocger

Is this you? John Reaves (talk) 23:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can you please review your policy on Megameeting information beling listed

I have tried on many occasions to add useful information on additional companies that are in the Video Conference space. Companies like Adobe and MegaMeeting.com have video conference technology built on Flash technology. This has not only brought down the cost of the service, increase the amount of Video displayed, but also allowed it to work on multiple platforms like Mac, PC, and Linux. People look to Wikipedia for information that is current and supplied by multiple sources. I am unsure why companies like Microsoft, Radvision, Webex, Gotomeeting can have their information displayed here and not other companies. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jasonrrichmond (talk • contribs) 01:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Can'tnap...

You refer to an innocent user's comments as trolling and you remove his vote. Why? Zbl 02:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zbl

I'm not sure if this is appropriate, but what do you think on running a checkuser on Zbl at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CBDrunkerson? It seams there may be a chance he is a sock of User:CBDrunkerson RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 02:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wolfgang The First

Just so you know, he's sat right next to me, hence why I'm reverting his edits so fast. He doesn't intend to stop, he's still doing it now. Vimescarrot 09:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, he's been blocked anyways. No worries. Vimescarrot 09:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's made a new account, Wolfgang The Second. Vimescarrot 09:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'll keep you updated. He'll (probably) be gone by 10:15 GMT, since that's when this period ends. Yes, we're in school. Vimescarrot 09:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang The Third is on its way, it seems. Not very original, is he? Vimescarrot 10:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's going for a new name, and he's turned his screen away from me....He's also reading everything I do. An idea occurs...Hehe, I just turned off his computer. :) Vimescarrot 10:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Hey, I just wanted to remind you that we shouldn't block a user if they haven't vandalize after their t4 warning. I was removing IPs from the list twice, and I saw that you had already blocked the users. Thanks, Nishkid 64 20:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

72.237.248.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - t4 at 20:02 UTC, last edit 20:01.

66.199.192.211 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) t4 at 19:50 UTC, last edit at 19:48 UTC.

Also, can you add block messages to user talk pages? I just noticed you hadn't done so for some IPs. Thanks, Nishkid 64 20:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, sorry about the template. Nishkid 64 20:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a good idea to me. Nishkid 64 21:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a speedy deletion tag

How should you go about removing a speedy deletion tag? I tagged an article earlier today - HotUKDeals - but the author seems to have cleaned it up pretty well. SparrowsWing _(talk) 00:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your assistance and prompt reply. SparrowsWing _(talk) 00:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:DavyJonesGSB

OK, an unblock is okay with me for now. If there's more vandalism, a temporary block. And while I'm leaving a message, do you mind if I use something similar to User:Luna Santin/Templates/Bar for my userpage (as I am remodeling it)? –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David A. Yeagley

Hi, somehow the libelous version of David A. Yeagley is the one that has become protected. Can you fix this? Thanks, as always, Badagnani 03:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you; I've just gone ahead and reverted to the original version myself, as it's only soft protected. Badagnani 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbar and improve me

Hi Luna Santin,

That userbar looks great, and I really like the improve me idea.
Mind if I borrow it for my userpage?

Cheers JackSparrow Ninja 03:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Composite superman

saw your edits and block here, and wanted to thank you. I had JUST found that he'd removed a comment regarding the merge [12] here, and was going to go to his talk and then find an Admin. Nice to know it' all been resolved. Thank you. ThuranX 04:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Case vs. Investigation

Hi, I am going to abuse your knowledge if you don't mind please :) What is the correct form by you as a native speaker:

30 Cases of Major Zeman

30 Investigations of Major Zeman

Where it means criminal cases which detective Major Zeman must solve. Thank you. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 08:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major Zeman is a policeman who solves 30 criminal (cases or investigations) during each episode. In each episode he gets a file with (case or investigation) and tries to found thief/murderer etc. In Czech it is "Tricet pripadu Majora Zemana" without official english translation. :) ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 08:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) I changed title to "Thirty Major Zeman's Cases" according your recommendations. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 08:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sock problems

Hi! Thank you for your help; Pink and I both especially appreciate our userpages being protected. WP:SM actually already maintains a watchlist of all of our articles at Special:Recentchangeslinked/Wikipedia:WikiProject Sailor Moon/Watchlist, so that should also be a good resource for watching the problem. Again, thanks, and let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Mostly I really hope he just gets bored and goes away soon. --Masamage 00:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They don't have a "Wikipedian-come-sysop-who-idles-in-#wikipedia-just-waiting-for-me-to-come-in-and-admin-you" barnstar, so I figured this would do:

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		I, Deon555, award Luna Santin this barnstar for his awesome speedy deletion, requested deletion, protection, and requested undeletion skills. Everytime I need something and I pop into #wikipedia with `!admin`, Luna's always the first to do the job. Keep up the good work, — D e on555^talk_desk^{sign here!} 01:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well let me say, you're definetly appreciated, don't you worry ;). Take care, — D e on555^talk_desk^{sign here!} 01:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sory i got to go il tell u tomarow i got a ?

lol sory thx --Rsivad 03:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sock problems (User talk:Masamage)

Don't you mean "Related changes?" -- Denelson 83 03:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

This vandalism edit on Crystallization has a personal email included, is that grounds for reporting to WP:RFO? --Nevhood 03:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just sent an email, and I'll let you know what they tell me. Thanks for the help! --Nevhood 04:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They haven't responded, but the edit was apparently hidden, I just checked the article history and the edit is no longer there. --Nevhood 04:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stealth

Thanks for taking a candid look at that Stealth article. That the subject is a company held by a prominent admin of Wikipedia makes it only more disconcerting. I am sure that the hive mind will be able to re-build the article, using more reputable and varied reference citations, and all will be better. I'm here to try to improve the encyclopedia. If it takes a few trout-slaps along the way, so be it. --72.94.164.52 05:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]