User talk:Macrocompassion

Welcome!

Hello, Macrocompassion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wellesley_Aron

Hello Macrocompassion. I responded to your question at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Wellesley_Aron. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

wellesley is deceased, died about 1986 (see actual biography): so please transfer to biography of deceased.Macrocompassion (talk) 16:03, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Jac16888 ^Talk 10:44, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ricksher (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC) Hi Macrocompassion - Also an engineer - I just want to say I'm really appreciating your flow diagram on the Macroeconomics article. Having studied Macro at the MBA level I've been surprised that the discipline as far as I'd been exposed to it had never produced this important kind of diagram. I went searching for it just in case and, there you were! Thanks and keep on producing more please![reply]

Hi Ricksher, thanks for your kind reply and encouragement. This diagram is basic to my research work in macroeconomics and it appears in my book and in two working papers, too. Should you not find them, please send me a message to chesterdh@hotmail.com Macrocompassion (talk) 10:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop adding your signature (--~~~~) to mainspace articles. Your contribution is already noted in the history page--Jac16888 ^Talk 12:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Justify the ways

Hi MacroCompassion!

Nice quote! :)

Please however do not edit other users' user pages. You are welcome to contact me on the talk page if you wish to discuss improving articles or Wikipedia matters. Let me know if I may help you or answer any questions.

Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 17:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

improving macroeconomics

Hello-I understand now that this IP is also you?

I don't know how much help I can be with the macroeconomics article, but I've pointed to your discussion at the WikiProject Economics talk page. Hopefully others can help out. CRETOG8(t/c) 17:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Using your circular flow model of the economy diagram

Hello,

I too am in the process of writing an econ textbook - International Micro and Macro Economics. Good luck with your endevor.

I know you have copy rights in the creative commons, but I am still requesting your permission to reprint the graph of the circular flow model that you have in economic system on Wikipedia. If I can get your name through e-mail I can then properly cite you.

In chapter one I am covering The Circular Flow Model of the Economy. I am producing the complete graph in steps, but as an illustration it will be helpful to show how other authors like yourself present the model.

I hope to have the 1st Chapter finished in a week if I have no further distractions. Presently I am in Bangkok, Thailand and we are having to adjust our schedules due to the flooding here. Hence the comment "no further distractions". The book should be finished by spring.

If you are interested I can send you a copy of chapter 1 after I clean it up a little, since it is still in the rough draft stages. The approach the book is taking is completely different than traditional economics textbooks and the models I am using are a little more intuitive when it comes to the realities of the economy and how the economy functions - both poorly and well.

By looking at the chapter you will also be able to see the context to which I am using your interpretation of Frank Hyneman Knight's Circular Flow Model of the Economy.

Best Regards,

Harley Meyer hmeyer@mninter.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.25.140.178 (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Harley, I have only just now seen your comments about my diagram or model of a social system or macroeconomy. My book about it "Consequential Macroeconomics--Rationalizing About How Our Social System Works" was published in 2015. I would like to see how you have tackled this subject. The big problem with macro is that too much intuition and biased politics have been applied to what I reckon is a most logical and scientific subject, having only one actual and true way for determining how the actual macro-economy functions. This is described in my book, which I will gladly share should you (or anyone else who is concerned with this matter), kindly send me a message to chesterdh@hotmail.com . I do have the copyright still, but you are welcome to use my diagram with acknowledgement of the source! Macrocompassion (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use this page to promote what appears to be a self-published book. SPECIFICO talk 17:11, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since the knowledge in my book is not mentioned here for commercial purposes (my e-copy version I offer for free to interested parties, including Harley Meir), I fail to see why you object. The book we are discussing was published in soft-cover by a firm of publishers and it is registered by them--not self-published as you might think. They sell it, but I don't. Macrocompassion (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alternate kinds of taxing the land value through leasing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alternate kinds of taxing the land value through leasing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robo^Cric Let's chat 09:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robo does apparently respond to this matter. I believe that the article about which we are dealing lacks a certain closely related matter and for it to be more fully comprehended this particular aspect of land values and their influence on the national economy is most relevant. It is a relatively new concept but prior versions in a slightly different form have been already tried, with limited success. As is common in macroeconomics there are politics involved, but in thinking about land values in this way there is none of it. Perhaps the politics comes from your side! Macrocompassion (talk) 09:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Coverbook.png

Thank you for uploading File:Coverbook.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 13:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright of Coverpage.png

This page is the front cover of my book Consequential Macroeconomics. Although it was published in 2015, the copyright remained with me, and I gladly share it with those who wish to include it, as well as the whole book too. I hold the copyright and gladly submit its use to your careful organization. Macrocompassion (talk) 14:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Time dilation are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 10:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]