User talk:Mehmood.Husain

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

MK

Can you explain to me why my recent edit to Mathew Knowles was reverted? I made the edit bc him being on the Grammy board/founding Music World was mentioned in the career and alcolades sections. I didn't see why it needed to be there too. I also added citations to the career section since the currect ones do not contain that info. 2600:1702:2A40:3E40:596F:5FC3:F1E2:AE51 (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The citations you added, one of them is from non-reliable source, and second one is an interview. As far as the removal of content is concerned, if you feel it should be removed, first discuss it on talk page. Mehmood.Husain (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same link (about MWE 20 year celebration ) that can be currently found cited at number 9, only the current link's address moved and says 404. I replaced the same link with its new address. I had no idea PR news wire was unreliable. He mentions his Xerox career and leaving for music in the interview link which is why I thought it was ok to cite it. I didn't know interviews were unreliable either. But ok I'll just stop editing, idk what's ok and not. 2600:1702:2A40:3E40:596F:5FC3:F1E2:AE51 (talk) 20:23, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Frankland moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jane Frankland, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheChronium 07:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mehmood.Husain. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Jane Frankland, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. TheChronium 07:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheChronium You moved one of the articles I have created to draftspace form WP:MAINSPACE. So, here I want to know few things about your comment on my talk page. First of all let me know, what is reliable source for you? Aren't Forbes and The Guardian are reliable sources? Secondly, aren't the articles solely about the subject?

Third thing is, let's assume, the subject is not notable for Wikipedia, but on what grounds you are notifying me about conflict of interest? I have nothing to do with the subject. If you think I'm being compensated by the subject, then I would personally request it for deletion from the draftspace if it is not the case, then don't apply your absurd stance while reviewing the pages. Let the senior editors to do their job if you can't justice with the topic. Mehmood.Husain (talk) 12:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mehmood.Husain! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:33, Sunday, July 11, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome!

Hi Mehmood.Husain! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Vukky^🌞 (talk • ctb • not a bot 🙂) 19:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Frankland has been accepted

Jane Frankland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Gettleman

Hello. For Dave Gettleman, if you know something about American football and the NFL, you know that's a clearly a hoax/false information/shitpost. The "source" used (NFL Launches Investigation on Dave Gettleman helping the Eagles scandal) looks real at first, but it's totally fake and the URL leads to this. 142.119.27.227 (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@142.119.27.227 Page has been restored to the old version. Mehmood.Husain (talk) 22:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop restoring this revision. That material is not properly sourced at all, and those accusations violate WP:BLP. The "Gettleman" ref is a garbage image. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@OhNoitsJamie I had already reverted the edit done by this IP 142.119.27.227, but he was claiming that I have reverted the factual content. Mehmood.Husain (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly not factual content. It's pure vandalism. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@OhNoitsJamie I agree, but there was edit war, so I restored the one contributed by one of the auto-confirmed editors. Mehmood.Husain (talk) 19:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential elections

That idiot vandalised the page again. I know who it is too... @bc35bcer_ - look at a twitter thread he is promoting slavery on. (I'm @niallhosking) 2A02:C7E:181E:CB00:3C8F:B3D5:F57A:6A8C (talk) 21:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Alice Fossi

Elena Alice Fossi, Kirlian Camera's frontwoman, once mentioned having fallen in love with a girl. She never outright said she's a lesbian or bi, but she did admit having had a crush on a girl. There's even an interview with her, possibly two, stating she had had a same-sex crush. 93.66.187.159 (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"I also like that a girl was in love with a girl. It happens, whether some people like it or not! Then, it's part of my own story..." (source: http://www.peek-a-boo-magazine.be/en/interviews/elena-alice-fossi-kirlian-camera-spectra-paris-2017/). --93.66.187.159 (talk) 22:33, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ 93.66.187.159 Discuss the issue on talk page. Mehmood.Husain (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you consider that a valid source? 93.66.187.159 (talk) 23:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ 93.66.187.159 The source is not reliable. Mehmood.Husain (talk) 22:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Miloon Kothari

Hi, I returned to a neutral, sourced and non-accusatory version, which may cause various pov-pushers to react. Article to watch in my opinion. Cheers, Kimdome (talk) 11:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ayyankali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undo at The Flash (season 9)

Hi there Mehmood.Husain! I've reverted your revert in that article because your edit reintroduced unsourced material. When reverting, always be sure to check previous edits by the same user/IP. In this case, it would've revealed that the IP had been adding and undoing their own additions, all of which were unsourced. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 20:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Magnis Energy Technologies

Hello, Mehmood.Husain, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username GeoffreyT2000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Magnis Energy Technologies, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnis Energy Technologies.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GeoffreyT2000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

--Blablubbs (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]