User talk:MojaveNC

Hello, MojaveNC. You have new messages at Philg88's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mojave

Both you and I have some common interest in the west and deserts. Lets see, if you want, if we can collaberate on areas of common interest. I want to contribute pictures and editing work. Let me know what you think. I think I jumped the gun in a few areas and misunderstood your intentions toward me. I think we can work together. BTW offer suggestions. Thanks, Dave

St. George Pictures

Would you happen to have pictures for the St. George area that are up-to-date? I am from St. George, but am currently living quite a ways away. I'm really looking for some good downtown pictures...VBlack 18:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LVCityFlag.jpg has been listed as a possible copyright violation

An image that you uploaded, Image:LVCityFlag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

David Newton 16:04, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Context?

What do you want to know in the article Steam (band) that is not already in there?

Oops, sorry, I did not see your question at first. It's because of the Sox-Cubs rivalry. I will add something about that, and take away the context banner. :) Wahkeenah 13:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, the article already says that. Unless you have other questions, I will remove the context banner. Wahkeenah 14:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas, Nevada

I reverted your changes since most of what you added is already included in Las Vegas metropolitan area and Clark County School District. Text should only be in one place, otherwise you create an update nightmare. I believe that all of this is already linked in the article, but if clearer links need to be added, that could be done. Vegaswikian 06:27, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nevada State parks

Dear M, instead of adding {{stub}} to the park articles you create, I urge you to consider adding {{nevada-geo-stub}} and save the stub-sorting team some work. Thanks. User:Crzrussian 14:47, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contact

I have not decided to turn on e-mail for wiki yet. So that option is currently not available. Vegaswikian 06:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mt trumbull

thanks for adding the picture to the Mount Trumbull Wilderness page. improve it further if you can.--Tainter 04:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capitals and Capitols

Next time just move the page. This takes all the previous versions to a new page, and sets up a redirect from the old page (in this case the misspelled version). Cutting and Pasting to a new article leaves the old history behind. Not a big issue but it can be quite significant if you don't properly move more established articles, or those with a lot of discussion on the talk page. Keep up the good work! --Steve _(Slf67)^talk 08:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/MojaveNC

Hi. This case looks interesting. I'll take a look at the edits and photos and have a chat with User:Staplegunther. If you want to provide more background, or just want to have a chat, leave me a message on my talk page or send me an email. Regards SilkTork 22:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a message on Staplegunther's talk page. I agree that the images are misplaced. It looks to me just like a new user who is unsure how things are done. I have sent him a welcome message and given him some soft words of encouragement. I have suggested some reading, and that he should get in touch with me. If he continues to misplace inappropriate pictures in articles that you are watching, please let me know and I'll speak to him. Regards SilkTork 23:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Mormon Corridor==It is one thing to edit, it is another thing to remove citiations that don't meet your personal criteria. Please be more considerate of others who contribute to Wikipedia. Thanks. -Staplegunther

Hi. Staplegunther appears to be OK now. I am monitoring his edits, and there are no real problems - just another editor finding his feet. If you see any other of his edits that you feel could do with some advise then let him know - I think he would welcome your support and encouragement. Any problems let me know - I'm always willing to help out. And thanks for bringing this to our attention. Unless you have any objections I will now close this case. Regards SilkTork 16:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BDPine_Park_Wash.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BDPine_Park_Wash.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bbc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbc.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Belmontcourthouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Belmontcourthouse.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CL3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CL3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urban areas template

I noticed that the title Urban areas on the template links to Metropolitan areas. Is this correct? Also, Dallas really should include Ft.Worth since it is listed that way on the reference found on the Urban areas article. Postoak (talk) 01:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting the MSA ranking. The MSA definition is the only one applied unifomrly throughout the US. Please see Talk:Combined Statistical Area for details. MSA data conforms to the single urban core definition. CSAs are not approporiate for definining single metropolitan areas as they contain several central cities. --Polaron | Talk 05:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting the template. You have already reverted to your preferred version where you mix and match CSAs and MSAs four times. I have changed to the urban area definition instead of the MSA definition yet you still revert. If you persist, you may be temporarily blocked from editing per the three revert rule. --Polaron | Talk 22:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your 3RR report

The report you filed at the 3RR noticeboard actually ended up highlighting your own 3RR violation. While I'm not issuing a block for anyone at this time, I have protected the template temporarily and I encourage you to continue the discussion on the talk page. The main conflict seems to be over an understanding of semantics, so I hope 48 hours is enough time to resolve it one way or another. If need be, please get help through the proper conflict resolution process rather than continuing the edit war. Kafziel ^Talk 09:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Black Mountain / Henderson

Thanks for the clarification. It is interesting that just about every public entity, including the company that builds those radio and tv towers (http://www.americantower.com/OASISPublic/SitePublicPage/SiteListGeneratorResults.asp?SiteListType=2&cmbState=32)....

Similar in some ways to Kansas City, Mo., being across from Kansas City, Kan. Not to mention that there are Black Mountains Arizona, New Hanpshire and North Carolina.

Being as that we seem to be renaming and rebordering parts of the Vegas Valley constantly, perhaps some renaming is in order here.. Perhaps a Vegas-sounding name for our TV tower mountain. My vote: Mount Elvis. Spitwater (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Review-journal-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Review-journal-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP Oregon invite

You are invited to join WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon. You received this invitation because of your interest in Oregon and/or your edits to Oregon articles. If you would like to join, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants. New members can feel free to introduce themselves here.

—EncMstr (talk) 06:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Cthdrl2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cthdrl2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Wenatch.jpg

File:Wenatch.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Wenatchee.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Wenatchee.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LundNev.jpg is now available as Commons:File:LundNev.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Summerlin news.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Summerlin news.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Trumbull Rd.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Trumbull Rd.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dixie (Utah), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centuryfootball.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Centuryfootball.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. 130.88.141.34 (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Calfcreek.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Metro regional government logo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Metro regional government logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading the new Metro logo

Hi, would you or one of your communications cohorts want to upload a copy of the new Metro logo? PS, no more Pistachio Incidents! :) (I'm actually an extra custodian at MRC) Jason McHuff (talk) 06:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MojaveNC. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MojaveNC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Peterson (Oregon politician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lynn Peterson (Oregon politician), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lynn Peterson (American politician) (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thegooduser was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lynn Peterson (American politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lynn Peterson (American politician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MojaveNC! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]