User talk:Noahe123

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Schwede 66 20:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were first informed of copyright in April 2019 with this edit. User:Blythwood then then informed you about some finer details of this problem. Then in early June, you started the Pukerua Bay School until User:Gadfium warned you of a copyright violation later that month. I'm not sure why you requested your Pukerua Bay School article to be deleted in August but after that was done, you restarted that article in October. By doing so, you have reintroduced the copyviolation. Here's an example:

source: ... the school opening at Pukerua Bay local children had to catch the train or walk to the nearest school which was at Plimmerton.
your article: ... the school opened in Pukerua Bay, local children had to catch a train or walk to the nearest school in Plimmerton.

source: By 1940 there were nearly 50 pupils with two teachers and the original classroom was becoming somewhat crowded.
your article: In 1940, there were almost 50 pupils with two teachers, and the original classroom was getting a little crowded.

source: The following year another classroom was added and since then further classrooms have been added as the school roll has expanded.
your article: A further classroom was added the following year, and since then further classrooms have been added as the school roll has expanded.

So this is the third time that you introduce a copy violation. I'm sorry but I see no other way but to block you as per WP:WHYBLOCK. Schwede 66 20:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noahe123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have made some good improvements to wikipedia article Noahe123 (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not address the reasons for the block. I strongly suggest you read the guide to appealing blocks before making another unblock request. stwalkerster (talk) 21:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've restored the declined unblock message that you removed. While blocked, you are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests. stwalkerster (talk) 21:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bronwyn Labrum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bronwyn Labrum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronwyn Labrum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 19:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hairy Maclary and Friends.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hairy Maclary and Friends.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]