User talk:Ram nareshji

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sorry sir i am new to wikipedia as userRam nareshji (talk) 16:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Ram nareshji, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which is re-usable for another mission: rockets, space-craft or space flight?

The answers in my opinion are that rockets do not go beyond low orbit but are sometimes designed to be re-used, although whether they are or not depends on how well they survive the launch and recovery.

Spacecraft can be designed to stay in space, or to burn up on re entry, or to survive re-entry. Those that stay in space may carry on working there or be abandoned. We have not scrapped a craft in space yet but will probably have to one day. Those that survive re-entry will be inspected for re-use and probably scrapped or sent to a museum as a display, depending on how well they have survived and whether anyone wants them.

Space flight is a concept, like a bus trip. Therefore the idea of re-use does not really apply. You do not re-use a space flight, you go on another one.

Solar panels can be detatched and folded so they may be left in space, or packed into the craft for re-entry. Again, whether they are re-used will depend on how well they have survived this process.

I hope this answers your question. Britmax (talk) 07:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

& also tell if space-craft has solar panels so how they reach earth safely & re-usable for next mission?

When the craft is launched in a rocket the panels are folded and small rams deploy them in space, so these rams could be designed to fold them up again for re-entry. If they are not designed to do this they may have explosive bolts so that they detatch themselves from the craft, or an astronaut may have to EVA and detatch them (or fold them up, or unlock them to allow them to do so). This is assuming that the craft is designed for re-entry at all: it may not be. Have you read our article Space craft and the articles for the individual missions such as Skylab? Britmax (talk) 07:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In answer to your further questions, if you read the article carefully you can infer that which crew was which: I don't think the backup crew were needed, so you will have one crew taking over from another. The fact that one example of the Soyuz capsule is in a museum does not stop the type of capsule from still being in service. As an aside, entries here are usually signed at the end, not the start as you are doing. Like this: Britmax (talk) 11:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soyuz-U rocket is destroyed in Siberia.

In the infobox of the rocket's article 745 launches are listed. There are 724 successful ones and 21 failures. Do you think they made more than one rocket? Britmax (talk) 11:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Helpdesk

Hi Ram nareshji, I have replied at WP:HD#how to know if somebody replied to my questions in help desk?. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 06:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you copy-pasting questions from other websites into our reference desks?

You have copy-pasted multiple questions from other websites onto our reference desks. Why are you doing this? AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:39, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Question

Removed "Why no one is answering my questions?", see [1].Phoenixia1177 (talk) 09:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tell it to someone else

/YAWN. --Onorem (talk) 02:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need confirmaton

Hi, you need to confirm that the questions I have left on the RD which were posted elsewhere under a different name were indeed written entirely by you. If they were not, you should delete them as copyright violations or reword them entirely in your own words. If you fail to do so, I will delete them and you should expect no tolerance in the future. Nil Einne (talk) 06:16, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for persistent disruptive editing. The problems with your editing have been explained and discussed at length. Either you understand what is wrong with your editing and pretend not to, which looks rather like trolling, or you don't don't understand, in which case it is doubtful that you have the ability to edit constructively. In either of those two cases, it is likely that you should really be blocked indefinitely, but for the present I am just giving a short block, to give you time to think over what you have been told about the problems with your editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:56, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

His disruptive editing was confined to the Reference Desks. A 48 hour block from the Reference Desks would have been enough warning. This user has been contributing to WP since 2012 and most of his editing has not been disruptive. Contact Basemetal here 22:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mechanism to selectively block a user from some pages only. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that. Sorry. Contact Basemetal here 22:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:AndyTheGrump User talk:Basemetal User:JamesBWatson please remove the ban on me, see i am using wiki account since 2012, but i never banned before, this is the first time i am facing the ban from editing, i didn't vandalize the wikipedia articles in any form, i always contribute wikipedia through talk feature(as i mention in my user page), but i don't edit wiki articles directly. if i do mistake then sorry, i will not repeat my mistakes in any form. but lift the ban please. Ram nareshji (talk) 03:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ram nareshji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will not repeat my mistakes Ram nareshji (talk) 03:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Copyright violation is completely unacceptable. No evidence you recognize your pattern of edits violates that or how you plan to change your behavior in the future. This unblock was requested even before you acknowleged any of your problems until they were specifically re-identified below, therefore you are seemingly not really interested in specifically solving your specific problems. DMacks (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Will you please explain why you were copying questions from other websites to the Wikipedia reference desks. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:AndyTheGrump User talk:Basemetal User:JamesBWatson first of all i am sorry for copying questions which i have done recently. i copied questions is for important reason, i want to make reference desk with new & research questions which were never asked on reference desk before in any form. so i found stackexchange questions are more innovative & useful, that's why i posting here on reference desk. but now on-wards i learned a lesson that we should not copy questions to reference desk. so i am sorry. please lift the ban. Ram nareshji (talk) 04:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you think this was 'useful'? Who did you think was going to be interested in the answers? AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:AndyTheGrump User talk:Basemetal User:JamesBWatson i learned a lesson, so i will not repeat the mistakes please lift the ban. Ram nareshji (talk) 04:09, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't answered my question. Why did you think that copying questions from elsewhere was 'important' and 'useful'? AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:AndyTheGrump User talk:Basemetal User:JamesBWatson i want to make wikipedia reference desk a reference to important questions & answers, see for example: you brought new question bank book from a shop, you will find all important questions all together in one book which is also called all in one, so like that i copied questions from stackexchange to reference desk, if you still have a doubt once visit stackexchange site you will find almost all questions are innovative. so i addicted to stackexchange, i didn't stop that addictions so i started posting here on reference desk, this is the reason, but i learned a lesson, so i will not repeat the mistakes, please lift the ban. Ram nareshji (talk) 04:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you clearly misunderstand the purpose of our reference desks, I can see no reason why you should be permitted to post further questions there. It isn't my decision though - an admin will have to decide. AndyTheGrump (talk)

Stack Exchange is much better suited to that role than Wikipedia RD, because it is easier to search there for related questions. —Tamfang (talk) 02:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:AndyTheGrump User talk:Basemetal User:JamesBWatson from now on-wards, i will strictly follow the rules of wiki, please don't prolonged ban on me. i will take this ban as first warning to me.Ram nareshji (talk) 06:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the reference desk is so that you can ask questions that you want to know the answer to, not so that you can turn the reference desk archives into a "question bank". The people who put time and effort into answering questions that you asked did so in order to help you. How do you think they are likely to feel about having spent time and effort into producing an answer that nobody visiting the reference desk actually wants to know about? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given the lack of any reassurance from you that the questions appearing on Physicsforums (but no where else that I can find) under a different name were written by you, I have deleted them as well. The only questions that remain on the RD are the IP block one, the TV telecast one, the basketball ones except for the first one which I deleted as appearing elsewhere (but not the followups in that question), the old yify one and the question about reusable spacecraft. If any of these questions, or any other questions or stuff you have posted to wikipedia was not written by you, please either tell us now, or delete them when/if your block expires. Beyond your apparent lack of understanding of the purpose of the RD, you also don't appear to understand our copyright policy as you should not be copy and pasting random stuff written by others here, particularly when you have not made it clear you did so. This was communicated to you before, but it sounds like you still don't get it. Nil Einne (talk) 13:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:AndyTheGrump User talk:Basemetal User:JamesBWatson User:Nil Einne Questions which were not blocked, where actually written by me. IP Block one, TV Telecast one, Basketball one,yify & reusable spacecraft, even this questions got replies. if this 5 questions are also illegal in wiki, you can delete the questions right now, i am in ban of editing. if i delete them, still questions will appear in history page,if you delete them, then it will delete completely, but i take this 48 hrs ban as warning, i will strictly follow the rules as i mention in previous replies. Ram nareshji (talk) 01:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He is clearly at it again.

Blocked once before for disruption of the reference desks / help desk.

See User talk:Ram nareshji#Need confirmaton

Just look at the editing history:

Ram nareshji (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Example:

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing#How to IMPORT this blocked attachments from gmail to another gmail?

copied from

[ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62023626/how-to-import-this-blocked-attachments-from-gmail-to-another-gmail ]

Also see:

Transit by road through Kenya

copied from

[ https://travel.stackexchange.com/questions/38631/transit-by-road-through-kenya ]

Sometimes he paraphrases the question (identifiable by the poor grammar) but his answers to requests for clarification make it clear that he is not posting about any actual problem that he personally is trying to solve.

Perhaps a topic ban from all reference desks and help desks would be appropriate? --Guy Macon (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020: Not here to make an encyclopedia

User:Ram nareshji, you appear to be using Wikipedia as a means to amuse yourself. If you are bored or lonely, you should not be pestering volunteer editors on Wikipedia to alleviate your boredom or loneliness. We edit in good faith, and do not appreciate wasting our time answering questions arising from idle curiosity. Your recent editing behavior is disruptive to this encyclopedia project and not appreciated.

You can be blocked tor being absolutely clueless as to how to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. We are not required to enumerate every instance of unconstructive editing that you are not welcome to make. It's incumbent upon you to anticipate the consequences of your actions in advance, as ignorance is no excuse. Social media and various forums on line exist as outlets for idle curiosity such as yours. They also block unconstructive contributors far faster and more permanently than does Wikipedia. --Quisqualis (talk) 00:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ram nareshji, take this tutorial to learn how to actually edit. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

prevent duplication of effort

If you copy questions from Stack Exchange to the WP Reference Desk, you should at least provide a link to the original and say why any answers given there are unsatisfactory. —Tamfang (talk) 02:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ram nareshji. Guy Macon (talk) 06:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]